Case law

In Re: The Estate of William Reynolds, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 11, 2007

Brown v. Weik, 725 S.W.2d 938, 945 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). However, only undue influence is prohibited. Id. An abuse of confidence and an exercise of domination and influence must be shown. Id. … Walter v. Hartm an, 67 S.W . 476, 477 (Tenn. 1902) (citing Boxly v. McKay, 36 (4 Sneed) Tenn. 286 (Tenn. 1856)). -15- Brown v.

Cumberland Advisory Group, LLC v. Martha Arnita Lee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 31, 2021

Therefore, CAG applied for a variance with the Metropolitan Nashville Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”). On October 12, 2015, the BZA met to discuss CAG’s request. Mr. … Mix v. Miller, 27 S.W.3d 508, 513 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). This Court explained in Hong v. Foust: 3 The Lees are “entitled to fair and equal treatment by the courts” as pro se litigants. Hessmer v.

C & W ASSET ACQUISITION, LLC, as Assignee of Chrysler First Financial Services Corporation v. Donald H. OGGS

230 S.W.3d 671 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 30, 2007

Irvin v. City of Clarksville, 767 S.W.2d 649, 651-21 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). … See Williams-Guice v. Board of Educ., 45 F.3d 161, 164 (7th Cir. 1995); Kelley v.

F. W. White & Associates, LLC v. John R. Chilton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 2024

Gregory Brown and G. Alan Rawls, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellants, John R. Chilton, Centennial Village Apartments, LLC, and Centennial Village Development, LLC. Matthew A. Grossman and Rebekah P. … Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev.

Trevor Howell v. Kennedy Smithwick

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 1, 2017

Long v. McAllister-Long, 221 S.W.3d 1, 12 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006); see also Thigpen v. Thigpen, 874 S.W.2d 51, 53 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993) (citing Gunn v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 296 S.W.2d 843, 844 (Tenn. 1956)). … Feb. 12, 2009) (quoting Brown v. Baird, No. 01A01-9704-JV-00148, 1997 WL 638278, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 1997)). “Minor inconvenience or embarrassment” is not sufficient. Brown, 1997 WL 638278, at *1.

Underwood v. Waterslides of Mid-America, Inc.

823 S.W.2d 171 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 1991

However, in medical malpractice cases this requirement is made mandatory by the Medical Malpractice Review Board and Claims Act of 1975. … In Gideon v.

Wood v. Prosser

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 11, 1997

Kemmerer v. ICI Americas, Inc., 70 F.3d 281, 287 (3d Cir. 1995); Conley v. Pitney Bowes, 34 F.3d 714, 717 (8th Cir. 1994); Williams v. Cordis Corp., 30 F.3d 1429, 1432 (11th Cir. 1994); Land v. … Fla. 1993); Singleton v. Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 613, 830 F. Supp. 630, ___ (N.D. Ga. 1993).

Catherine M. Love v. Doris Lakins Woods

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 4, 2010

Harbour v. Brown, 732 S.W.2d 598, 599 (Tenn. 1987). “The purpose of compromise is to avoid trial of sharply disputed issues and to dispense with wasteful litigation.” 15A C.J.S. Compromise & Settlement § 1 (2002). … Abatement, Inc. v. Astrum R.E. Corp., 27 S.W.3d 530, 539 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000); see also Bennecker v. Fickeissen, No. E2004-02129-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 3017609 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 2005); O'Mary v.

Friendship Water Co. v. City of Friendship, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 21, 2020

See Fox v. … See Potter’s Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. Szekely, 461 S.W.3d 68, 72 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014) (“The judgment at issue involves questions of law that require analysis and explanation.”); State v.

Whaley v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

900 S.W.2d 296 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 27, 1995

Tatum v. Cordis Corp., 758 F.Supp. 457, 460 (M.D.Tenn.1991); Curtis v. Universal Match Corp., 778 F.Supp. 1421, 1425 (E.D.Tenn. 1991); Browder v. Pettigrew, 541 S.W.2d 402, 404 (Tenn.1976). … Atkins v. Kirkpatrick, 823 S.W.2d 547, 551 (Tenn.App.1991); Cook v. Spinnaker’s of Rivergate, Inc., 846 S.W.2d 810, 812 (Tenn.1993).

Lequita Nix Hilliard v. Dolgencorp, LLC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 2019

Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev. … Anderson v.

In Re Trey S.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 20, 2019

Foster Care Review Board, January 9th of 2018, the Board was asking Dad what are his intentions, and he said that he wanted to reunite with Mom. … V.

American Excavators, LLC. v. RCR Building Corporation

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 2003

P. 13(d); Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721, 727 (Tenn. 2001). A trial court's conclusions of law are subject to a de novo review with no presumption of correctness. S. Constructors, Inc. v. … Seals v. England/Corsair Upholstery Mfg. Co., 984 S.W.2d 912, 915 (Tenn. 1999) (quoting Collins v. Howmet Corp., 970 S.W.2d 941, 943 (Tenn.1998)).

Jose Sifuentes, D/B/A Jose's Electric v. D.E.C., LLC

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 17, 2020

Farmer v. … The relevant statutory language provides: (b) Any contractor required to be licensed under this part who is in violation of this part or the rules and regulations promulgated by the board shall not be

Wright v. Quillen

909 S.W.2d 804 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 1995

Pritchett v. Thomas Plater & Co, 144 Tenn. 406 , 232 S.W. 961 (1921). The controlling intention is that ascertainable from the acts of the parties. Wyatt v. Brown, 39 Tenn. App. 28 , 281 S.W.2d 64 (1955). … In Best v.

Melinda Keeling v. Coffee County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 18, 2018

See Lee Med., Inc. v. … She further cites Trainor v.

The Estate of Eldora Burkes, by and through its Administrator, C.T.A., Calvin Burkes v. St. Peter Villa, Inc., d/b/a St. Peter Villa Nursing Home

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 12, 2007

Lacy v. Cox, 152 S.W.3d 480, 483 (Tenn. 2004); Green v. Moore, 101 S.W.3d 415, 418 (Tenn. 2003). … For example, in Russell v. Brown, No. E2004-01855-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 1991609 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Johnson

989 S.W.2d 710 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 21, 1998

In American Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. … Franchise Tax Board], 463 U.S. [159] at 164, 103 S.Ct. [2933] at 2939, 77 L.Ed.2d [545] at 552. AT & T v. Huddleston, 880 S.W.2d 682, 689 (Tenn.Ct.App.1994).

Dennis Allen v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 22, 2004

Code Ann. § 8-44-102; Neese v. Paris Special Sch. Dist., 813 S.W.2d 432, 436 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990) (citing Alaska Comm. Coll. Fed. of Teachers v. … The Tennessee Supreme Court has construed such language to include: any board, commission, committee, agency, authority or any other body, by whatever name, whose origin and authority may be traced to State

Bradley v. Lewis

99 S.W.3d 82 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 1995

Beadles v. Alexander, 68 Tenn. 604, 607 (1877); see also Davis v. Davis, 74 Tenn. 543, 544 (1880); Orr v. Cox, 71 Tenn. 617, 619 (1879); Patterson v. Mitchell, 9 Tenn.App. 662, 665 (1929). … Brown, 209 Tenn. 141, 148-49 , 351 S.W.2d 385, 388 (1961). Even though we give the trial courts leeway with regard to the substance of their instructions, Mitchell v.