Case law

South Harpeth Farms v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 5, 2001

See Hoover, Inc. v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996); Hoover Motor Express Co. v. R.R. & Pub. Utils. … See Hoover v. Metro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

DAVID HEARING v. DAN E. ARMSTRONG

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 12, 2025

State v. Silva, 680 S.W.2d 485 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1984); accord, Barker v. Parker, 2[0]12 WL 113690 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). Accordingly, Mr. … (citing Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of Memphis, 363 S.W.3d 436, 445 (Tenn. 2012); Brown v. Brown, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (Tenn. 1955)).

Kenneth Fulmer v. Jeffrey Follis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 20, 2018

Having said that, they don’t want to take out the board and then have to deal with the drywall and replacing the board. … After removing the 1x8 boards from the wall, Mr.

In Re Estate of Joe Richard Estes

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 4, 2024

SNPCO, Inc. v. City of Jefferson City, 363 S.W.3d 467, 472 (Tenn. 2012). “Whether a claim is barred by an applicable statute of limitations is a question of law.” Brown v. … [Estate of] Brown, 402 S.W.3d [193,] 200 [(Tenn. 2013)] (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 32-4-108).

Crass v. Walls

36 Tenn. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 11, 1953

However, following Hope v. Hamilton County, 101 Tenn. 325 , 47 S. W. 487 ; Madison County v. Alexander, 116 Tenn. 685 , 94 S. W. 604 ; Savage v. Mynatt, 156 Tenn. 119, 123 , 299 S. W. 1043 ; Hammon v. Miller, 13 Tenn. … In Madison County v.

Jamie Hamilton v. Gary Cook

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 1998

Defendant Tennessee Wildlife Resources Commission (hereafter Commission) is an independent and separate, state administrative board of conservation for game, fish and wildlife … Co. v.

Omni Aviation v. Perry

807 S.W.2d 276 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 19, 1990

See also Pennsylvania Dental Ass ’n. v. Medical Serv. Ass’n., 745 F.2d 248 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2021 , 85 L.Ed.2d 303 (1985). Here Mr. … Moman v. Walden, 719 S.W.2d 531 (Tenn.App.1986). *282 There are genuine issues of fact in this case. However, they are not material.

Friendship Telephone Company v. Russom

43 Tenn. App. 441 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 13, 1957

That case has been approved in later cases, including these: International Harvester Co. v. Sartain, 32 Tenn. App. 425, 460 , 222 S. W. (2d) 854 ; Kingsport Utilities, Inc., v. Brown, 201 Tenn. 393 , 299 S. … Wallace v. Electric Power Board, 36 Tenn. App. 527 , 259 S. W. (2d) 558 , relied on by defendant, is likewise not in point. The accident happened at the intersection of a street.

State ex rel. Walter J. Davis v. ABC Brentwood Locksmith Service

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 20, 2005

The Defendant did not appeal his assessment to the Board of Assessment Appeals or the Board of Equalization and has not utilized the available administrative appeal process and remedies. 4. … Bank of Commerce and Trust Co. v. Senter, 149 Tenn. 569, 260 S.W. 144 (1924) In Tidwell v.

Bryant v. Bryant

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 18, 1998

Dunlap v. Dunlap, 996 S.W.2d 803, 814- 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998) citing Cutsinger v. Cutsinger, 917 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tenn. Ct. App.1995); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 166 (Tenn. Ct. App.1994). … King v. King, 986 S.W.2d 216, 219 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998) citing Cohen v. Cohen, 937 S.W.2d 823, 832 (Tenn.1996); Ellis v. Ellis, 748 S.W.2d 424, 427 (Tenn.1988); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163.

Mary S. Fendley v. Mart G. Fendley

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 1997

Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 775 S.W.2d at 622; Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d at 154. … Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168. In the final analysis, the justness of a particular division of marital property depends on its final results considered in light of the pertinent factors in Tenn.

Penney Mosley v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 21, 2019

service board was located). … and represent the Board in other matters.”

Faithful v. Gardner

799 S.W.2d 232 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 8, 1990

Starnes v. First American Nat. Bank of Jackson, 723 S.W.2d 113 (Tenn.App.1986); Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn.App. 78 , 320 S.W.2d 721 (1958). … In Smith v.

Rush v. Rush

33 Tenn. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 19, 1949

Boggers v. Boggers, 65 Tenn. 299 . See also Chenault v. Chenault, 37 Tenn. 248 . … Brown v. Brown, 156 Tenn. 619 , 4 S. W. (2d) 345 ; Buchholtz v. Buchholtz, 175 Tenn. 87 , 132 S. W. (2d) 208 .

Thompson v. Chafetz

164 S.W.3d 571 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 4, 2004

See Underwood v. Zurich Ins. Co., 854 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tenn.1993); Banks v. Dement Constr. Co., 817 S.W.2d 16, 18 (Tenn.1991); Toney v. Mueller Co., 810 S.W.2d 145, 147 (Tenn.1991); Travis v. … City of Murfreesboro, 686 S.W.2d 68, 70 (Tenn.1985); Spruce v. Spruce, 2 S.W.3d 192, 194 (Tenn. Ct. App.1998); Day v. Day, 931 S.W.2d 936, 939 (Tenn. Ct. App.1996); Ellison v. Alley, 902 S.W.2d 415, 418 (Tenn. Ct.

James P. Hurt v. State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 8, 2012

HURT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hickman County No. IICV4353 Timothy L. Easter , Chancellor No. … M2011-01158-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 8, 2012 Inmate filed petition seeking review of decision of prison disciplinary board convicting him of various disciplinary offenses.

Yolanda Burse v. Lakeside Behavioral Health

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 19, 2021

Therein, she alleged liability for the wrongful death of her son, Cortez Brown, by stabbing on February 9, 2019. … Sneed v.

Naomi Schutte, as Adminstrator of the Estate of William Anthony Lucy v. Cheyenne Johnson, Shelby County Assessor

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 2010

See Fentress County Bank v. Holt, 535 S.W.2d 854, 857 (Tenn. 1976); Rosewood, Inc. v. Garner, 476 S.W.2d 273, 276 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1972). … These issues are not purely legal issues; they are factual issues best left to the expertise of the county board. See Rosewood, Inc. v. Garner, 476 S.W.2d 273, 276 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1972).

Coffman v. Poole Truck Line, Inc.

811 S.W.2d 908 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 14, 1991

In the absence of a showing of prejudice, we think that a discipline imposed by the Board is sufficiently corrective. … See, King v. King, Ct. of Appeals, Nashville, App. No. 89-46-11 (1989).

City of Memphis, a Municipal Corporation v. The Civil Service Commission of the City of Memphis and Tommy Moore

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 29, 2004

Prior to 1989, section 27-9-114 of the Tennessee Code provided that the common law writ of certiorari was the proper vehicle for appealing the decisions of a civil service board.7 Huddleston v. … See CF Indus. v. Tenn. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 599 S.W.2d 536, 540 (Tenn. 1980); Jackson Mobilphone Co., Inc. v. Tenn. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 876 S.W.2d 106, 110-11 (Tenn. Ct.