Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstennctapp

8,955 results

0.99s

  • Jerry Nelms as next of kin and of the Estate of Inez Nelms v. Walgreen Company

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 7, 1999

    Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co., 833 S.W.2d at 901; Wasielewski v. K Mart Corp., 891 S.W.2d 916, 919 (Tenn. App. 1994). … Lettner v. Plummer, 559 S.W.2d 785, 787 (Tenn. 1977); Goldsmith v. Roberts, 622 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tenn. App. 1981); Brandon v. Wright, 838 S.W.2d at 536. Bingham v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stacy Harris v. Gaylord Entertainment Company

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 19, 2013

    Brown, 393 S.W.3d at 708. “To make this determination, courts ‘must look to the words themselves and are not bound by the plaintiff’s interpretation of them.’” Id. (citing Stones River Motors, Inc., v. Mid-South Pub. … Brown v. Mapco Express, Inc., 393 S.W.3d 696, 707 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012); see Brown v. Christian Bros. University, 2013 WL 3982137, at *10 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Johnson City

    41 Tenn. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 11, 1956

    Notes to Gilson v. Delaware, etc. Canal Co., 36 Am. St. Rep. 811 ; Barr v. Railroad, supra; Rosenbaum v. Shoffner, 98 Tenn. [624] 630, 40 S. W. 1086 , and cases cited; 13 Am. & Eng. … In Gray v. Brown, 188 Tenn. 152 , 217 S. W. (2d) 769, 772 , it was held that the act of the plaintiff, Mrs.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • City of Cookeville v. Mary Jackson

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 19, 2012

    M2008–01036–COA–R3–CV, 2009 WL 3172134, at *3 (citing Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50–51 (Tenn. 1977)). … Among other things, the Board must determine what property may be acquired for the park. Tenn. Code Ann. §13-16- 207(b)(1)(B).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Byron Avenue 3501, LLC v. Metropolitan Historic Zoning Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, TN

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 24, 2011

    Thomas V. White, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Byron Avenue 3501, LLC. J. … Watts v. Civil Serv. Bd., 606 S.W.2d 274, 276 (Tenn. 1980); Leonard Plating Co. v. Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County, 213 S.W.3d 898, 903 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McMahon v. Baroness Erlanger Hospital

    43 Tenn. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 26, 1957

    In 1922 there was the case of Wallwork v. City of Nashville, 147 Tenn. 681 , 251 S. … See City of Kingsport v. Lane, 35 Tenn. App. 183 , 243 S. W. (2d) 289 and McCloud v. City of La Follette, 38 Tenn. App. 553 , 276 S. W. (2d) 763 , and cases cited.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Witcher v. Bilbrey

    878 S.W.2d 567 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 1994

    Following a discussion of the problem at the board’s June 2, 1992 meeting, the county executive requested that the board amend the county’s budget to provide sufficient funds to pay Judge Witch-er’s salary in addition to … The issue of Judge Witcher’s salary split the board when it met on June 15,1992.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Carrol Preston Flannary v. Joyce Ann Flannary

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 13, 2002

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 13, 2002 CARROL PRESTON FLANNARY v. … Fisher v. Fisher, 648 S.W.2d 244, 246 (Tenn. 1983); Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell Lloyd MaGill v. Mary R. MaGill

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2004

    Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Such a division is to be effected upon consideration of the statutory factors found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-121(c) (Supp. 2003). … Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168. The record in this case is devoid of any evidence as to the value of MaGill Electric and C & M Lounge.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South Harpeth Farms v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 5, 2001

    See Hoover, Inc. v. Metro. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996); Hoover Motor Express Co. v. R.R. & Pub. Utils. … See Hoover v. Metro Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 924 S.W.2d 900 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Interstate Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Houston

    50 Tenn. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 29, 1962

    Brown v. Tennessee Auto. Ins. Co., 192 Tenn. 60 , 237 S. W. (2d) 553 ; Wallace v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 187 Tenn. 692 , 216 S. W. (2d) 697 ; Gilmore v. Continental Cas. Co., 188 Tenn. 588 , 221 S. … Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 187 Tenn. 692, 701 , 216 S. W. (2d) 697 .” Brown v. Tennessee Auto. Ins. Co., 192 Tenn. 60, 63 , 237 S. W. (2d) 553 . *181 In Bowlin v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barry Teague v. Barbara Teague

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 11, 2002

    Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163, 168 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Such a division is to be effected upon consideration of the statutory factors found in T.C.A. § 36-4-121(c) (2001). … Smith v. Smith, 912 S.W.2d 155, 161 (Tenn. Ct. App.1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carole J. Boyd v. Town of Morrison

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 29, 2022

    At a regularly scheduled public meeting of the Town’s Board of Aldermen on April 24, 2001, the Board passed on first reading Ordinance 01-01 and Ordinance 01-02 with the intent to annex approximately 396 acres, which included … Then, on October 1, 2001, the Board held a public hearing to discuss Ordinance 01-03, during which the Board also voted to pass the ordinance.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seibers v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 21, 2000

    Starks v. Browning, 20 S.W.3d 645, 650 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999); Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers §§ 16, 17 (2000). … Crawford v. Logan, 656 S.W.2d at 364; Starks v. Browning, 20 S.W.3d at 650.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ronnie Gordon v. Tractor Supply Company

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 8, 2016

    Id.; Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997). In so doing, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party‟s favor. Godfrey v. … According to the plaintiff, the drug manufacturer “falsely and maliciously” filed a complaint against her with the Tennessee Board of Pharmacy. Id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Demetra Lyree Parker v. Warren County Utility District

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 9, 1998

    Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., 970 F.2d 178, 184 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1041 (1992); cf. Campbell v. … Bank v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Juanita M.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 16, 2026

    Keisling v. Keisling, 92 S.W.3d 374, 378 (Tenn. 2002). … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laura Coffey v. Cherokee Aviation, Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 13, 1995

    Otis v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 850 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tenn.1992); Hunter v. Burke, 958 S.W.2d 751, 755 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). … The Board’s accident report contains the Board’s determination of the probable cause of an accident, but the factual accident report contains the results of the investigation by the Board’s investigator.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hager v. Hager

    17 Tenn. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 11, 1933

    In Bell v. … Much less is he presumed to be ready to meet all that report and rumor may have thrown out against him. ’ ’ The same rule was applied in Birchfield v. Bussell, 3 Cold., 230 , and Hackett v. Brown, 2 Heisk., 265 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Crowe v. John W. Harton Memorial Hospital

    579 S.W.2d 888 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 1979

    Scates v. Board of Commissioners, 196 Tenn. 274 , 265 S.W.2d 563 (1954). … See Scates v. Board of Commissioners, 265 S.W.2d at 567 (eradication of sovereign immunity is in the sphere of the Legislature, not the courts).

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.