Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,955 results
0.95s
Joshua L. Carter v. George Little
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 23, 2007
The chancery court granted the Board’s motion to dismiss on November 8, 2006. … Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 924 S.W.2d 632, 639 (Tenn. 1996) (citing Landers v. Jones, 872 S.W.2d 674, 675 (Tenn. 1994); Wilson v. Tenn. Dep’t of Correction, No.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGary Haiser v. Michael McClung
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2018
See Harrison v. … See Hughes v. New Life Dev.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 1998
Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. 600, 610, 281 S.W.2d 492, 497 (1955); Riden v. Snider, 832 S.W.2d 341, 343 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). … Board of Claims, 165 Tenn. 201, 215-16, 54 S.W.2d 953, 958 (1932), and when consent is given, suits may be brought only in the manner specifically provided by the General Assembly. State ex rel. Allen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDan Johnson v. Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 31, 2002
State v. Johnson, No. 61, 1989 W L 8657 3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 2, 198 9), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Dec. 4, 198 9). As a result of the robbery conviction, the Tennessee Board of Paroles revoked Mr. … Bradley v. State ex rel. Haggard, 222 Tenn. 535, 540, 438 S.W.2d 738, 740 (1969); Lamb v. State, 207 Tenn. at 163, 338 S.W.2d at 586; Tusant v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarry Jacocks And Dorothy Jacocks v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 13, 2008
Brooks v. Brooks, 992 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Tenn. 1999); Devorak v. Patterson, 907 S.W.2d 815, 818 (Tenn. Ct. … Brown, Ronnie Parker, Harry Jacocks, and Dorothy Jacocks. Lieutenant Tommy Brown of the Memphis Police Department was the officer who investigated the accident.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican National Bank & Trust Co. v. Auman
746 S.W.2d 464 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 13, 1987
Henshaw et al. v. Flenniken et al., 188 Tenn. 232 , 191 S.W.2d 541 (1945). The theory of an implied bequest was recognized by this court in Bedford v. … Ross v. Stiff, 47 Tenn.App. 355, 372-3 , 338 S.W.2d 244 (1960).
Cited 2 timesPublishedCourtney Anne Thompson v. Robert Harrison Thompson, III
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 24, 2012
Brown also watches her two grandchildren, and Grace has grown very close to them. Ms. … All roads lead back to Haas v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ. Harold Shankle Co. v. Bedford Co. Bd.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 1997
P ursuan t to the “construction manager method,” the Board co ntinues to bear the risk of cost overruns although the Board has greater control because the Board is contracting directly with the subcontractors … Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Bd. Of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873, 874 (Tenn. 1986). Courts must “determine the legislative intent, whenever possible, from the plain language of the statute.” Wilson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTony Willis v. Dept of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2001
However, with regard to the allegations that the disciplinary board’s procedure denied the petitioners due process, such allegations are the equivalent of a claim that the board acted arbitrarily and illegally. Davis v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571-73, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2706-07, 33 L. Ed. 2d 548, 557-59 (1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNissan North America, Inc. v. Haislip
155 S.W.3d 104 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 14, 2004
Nissan appealed the assessments to the State Board of Equalization (“the Board” or “the State”). … See IBM Credit Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 1999
Blackburn v. Blackburn, 526 S.W.2d 463 (Tenn. 1975); Garey v. Garey, 482 S.W.2d 133 (Tenn. 1972); Jones v. Jones, 503 S.W.2d 924 (Tenn. App. 1973). … See Cagle v. Cagle, 1998 Tenn. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · May 30, 1997
Petitioner/Appellant, ) 01-A-01-9611-CH-00521 v. ) Margaret Culpepper, as Commissioner) of the Tennessee Department of ) Rule No. … Armstrong v. Neel, 725 S.W.2d 953, 955 n.1 (Tenn. App. 1986). This statute not only sets forth the standard of review, but it also establishes which decision the court is to review.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 28, 1998
State v. Sawyer, 1988 WL 13989, at *4. -2- he requested the Board reconsider his request for parole. The Board notified Mr. … This time limit applies to petitions seeking judicial review of decisions of the Board of Paroles. See Thandiwe v. Traughber, 909 S.W.2d at 803- 04.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 6, 1996
See Lewis v. Boyd, 838 S.W.2d at 220, 221; Spiegel v. Buntrock, 571 A.2d at 774. The burden is on the party challenging the board’s decision to establish facts rebutting the presumption. See Aronson v. … See Levine v. Smith, 591 A.2d at 212. ....
Cited 0 timesPublishedDanny A. Stewart v. Gayle Ray, Commissioner, TDOC
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 19, 2011
available to you on this matter through the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole.” … Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827, 842 (Tenn. 2008)(citing Watson v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 970 S.W.2d 494 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 5, 2018
See Withrow v. … The Board simply is not a judicial system; thus, a Board member is not an officer of a judicial system. Moncier v. Bd. of Prof.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Doe By His Next Friend Jane Doe v. Brentwood Academy Inc.
578 S.W.3d 50 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2018
Shane Grp., Inc., 825 F.3d at 305 (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 710 F.2d at 1180.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCharles Hyatt v. Adenus Group, LLC
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 12, 2022
Jones v. Jones, 150 Tenn. at 595, 266 S.W. at 121; Alexander v. … See Maggart v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNashville Railway & Light Co. v. Owen
11 Tenn. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 9, 1929
J., 1223; Gill v. Brown, 130 Tenn., 174 , 169 S. W., 752 ; North Memphis Savings Bank v. Union Bridge & Const. Co., supra; Sweeney v. Erving, supra. … Co. v. Field, 69 C. C. A. 536 , 137 Fed. 14, 15 ; Brown v. Swineford, 44 Wis. 282, 293 , 28 Am. *33 Rep. 582.
Cited 11 timesPublished9 Tenn. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 7, 1929
Sampson v. Marr, 7 Baxt., 492 ; Anderson v. Walker, Mart. & Yerg., 200, 2 Webb’s Meigs Digest, 1608. … See Sampson v. Marr, supra; Anderson v. Walker, supra; Fielder v. Pemberton, supra. This assignment must be overruled.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna