Case law

McCanless, Com'r v. Evans

177 Tenn. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1941

Massa v. State, 159 Tenn., 428, 429 , 19 S. … State, supra; United States v. Borkowski, D. C., *92 268 F., 408, 412 ; Brown v. Commonwealth, 208 Ky., 345 , 270 S. W., 833 ; State ex rel. v. District Court, 72 Mont., 77 , 231 P., 1107 ; McBride v.

Morris v. Swaney

54 Tenn. 591 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1872

The jurisdiction of courts of chancery in this State to set up lost wills when the facts clearly appear, has been considered as well settled since the cases of Brown v. Brown, 10 Yerg., 84 ; Buchanan v. … In the case of Lowe v.

Warren v. Cleveland

111 Tenn. 174 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1903

After stating that the consideration of this claim was the boarding of Mrs. … Rep., 97 ; Rogers v. Southern, 4 Baxt., 67 -69; McFerrin v. Woods, 3 Baxt., 242 -247; Allison v. Bradford, 1 Shannon’s Cas., 619-621; Broddie v. Johnson, 1 Sneed, 465 ; Butler v. Winters, 2 Swan., 92; Ott v.

Johnson v. Graham

183 Tenn. 367 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1946

The situation here is wholly different from that dealt with by the Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, in Pirtle v. Brown, March, 1941, 118 F. (2d) 218, 139 A. L. R. 557, certiorari denied by U. S. Sup. Ct., 314 U. … The opinion in Pirtle v.

Pennel v. State

122 Tenn. 622 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1909

.: *624 “State of Tennessee v. Jim Pennel. … The case of Turner v. State, 111 Tenn., 593 , 69 S.

Easley v. East Tennessee National Bank

138 Tenn. 369 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Ford v. Brown, 114 Tenn., 467 , 88 S. W., 1036 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 188. This certificate of deposit is undoubtedly payable on domand. … Scott, 14 Vt., 387 ; ten weeks, Losee v. Dunkin, 7 Johns., 70 , 5 Am. Dec., 245 ; three months, Herrick v. Woolverton, 41 N. Y., 581 , 1 Am. Rep., 461 ; four months, La Due v.

Black v. Black

166 S.W.3d 699 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2005

Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 229-30 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000) (citing Jerkins v. McKinney, 533 S.W.2d 275, 281 (Tenn. 1976)). … Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66-67 (Tenn. 2001). In addition, the elements of fraud must be “stated with particularity.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 9.02.

Sledge v. Hunt

157 Tenn. 606 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

This procedure was approved in a memorandum opinion filed at Knoxville on October 6,1928, in the case of Bowser v. Brown & White, Green Law. … Buchi, 78 Tenn., 346 ; Settle v. Marlow, 80 Tenn., 472 ; Jones v. Telegraph Co., 101 Tenn., 442 .

Fox v. Fox

102 Tenn. 77 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1899

The case of Brown v. … Here there is no intention to substitute, and the case of Brown v. Carman, 3 Head, 355 , is not in conflict with the rules laid down in this case.

Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp. v. Reeves

220 Tenn. 148 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1967

In the case of Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. … In Brown Shoe Company v.

Clarence Trosper v. Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.

273 S.W.3d 598 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2008

The boards ranged in size from sixteen to twenty feet in length and six to fourteen inches wide. … For example, in Sweat v.

Bohanan v. City of Knoxville

136 S.W.3d 621 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2004

Dill, a board certified cardiologist, testified that he evaluated the employee on August 26, 2002, at the request of the employee’s counsel. Dr. … Kellerman v. Food Lion, Inc., 929 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Tenn. 1996).

State v. White

362 S.W.3d 559 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2012

Rev. 1, 6 (1980) (discussing the Court of Criminal Appeals’ holding in Brown v. … Model Penal Code § 212.3 (Proposed Official Draft 1962) [hereinafter MPC]. 7 This Court “implicitly approved of the holding in Brown[ v. State]” in State v.

State v. Howard

645 S.W.2d 751 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1982

Officer Hand testified, “I tore a hold in — a small hole in one of the sides of the bags to observe what the contents were,” and found several rectangular shaped packages wrapped in cellophane over a layer of brown paper. … However as noted in the recent case of State v.

Day v. Sharp

128 Tenn. 340 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1913

It was held in Lewis v. … State v. Rose, supra; United States v. Hartwell, 6 Wall., 385, 393 , 18 L. Ed, 830, 832; People v. Duane, 121 N. Y., 367, 375 , 24 N. E., 845 .

Powell v. Riley

83 Tenn. 153 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1885

See also Brown v. Berry, 6 Cold., 98 . And the doctrine has been applied expressly to ditches dug and used for the benefit of a large body of land subsequently sold off in parcels: Elliott v. … Rhett, 5 Rich., 405 ; Curtis v. Ayroult, 47 N. Y., 73 ; Shaw v. Etheridge, 3 Jones, 300 .

Cleage v. Hyden

53 Tenn. 73 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1871

These provisions make the members of the religious denomination or society who may hold the land, beneficiaries, and expressly provide that the same shall be vested in a board of trustees, or other person designated by the … In the case of Gass v.

Goad v. Johnson

53 Tenn. 340 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1871

J., in Brown v. Edginton, 2 M. & G., 279, to be the result of all the authorities. See Benjamin on Sales, 488, where all the authorities are col *345 lected. … Lee, 2 East, 314; Chanter v. Hopkins, 4 M. & W., 64, etc. Mr.

Dykes v. Compton

978 S.W.2d 528 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1998

Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993)(quoting State v. Galloway, 45 Tenn. (5 Cold.) 326, 336-37 (1868)); see also State ex rel. Underwood v. … See Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 251- 52, 72 S. Ct. 240, 244, 96 L. Ed. 288, 294 (1952); Walden v.

Ford v. State

184 Tenn. 443 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1945

Proof of a particular threat is made to his' wife that he would kill her if she “turned him up” to the Draft Board, and it is shown that she nevertheless did report to the Board that he was not supporting her or the children … Hays v. State, 159 Tenn. 388 , 19 S. W. (2d) 313 ; Williams v. State, 164 Tenn. 562 , at page 570, 51 S. W. (2d) 482 ; Rowe v. State, 164 Tenn. 571 , at page 579, 51 S. W. (2d) 505 ; Hutchins v.