Case law

Brenner v. State

217 Tenn. 427 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1965

Plaintiff in error told the secretaries in his office to put these warrants in a brown envelope and put them in a filing cabinet. … Barnes v. Stilhwell, 165 Tenn. 174 , 54 S.W.2d 978 .

State v. Nelson

23 S.W.3d 270 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 2, 2000

Brown, Judge No. … See Fletcher v. State, 9 S.W.3d 103, 105 (Tenn. 1999).

City of Johnson City v. State ex rel. Maden

202 Tenn. 318 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1957

This Court in 1850 speaking through Judge Green in the case of Funa v. … Boardman v.

Hackerman v. State

189 Tenn. 130 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1949

Defendant relies upon four unreported cases of this Court: Wyndham v. State, 1 Hamilton criminal; Conley v. State 1 Hamilton criminal; White v. … Cards, dice, roulette wheels, slot machines, punch boards, certain kinds of boards or tables, lottery tickets, policy slips, ‘numbers’ books and slips are among the common forms of gambling devices and apparatus.”

State Ex Rel. First Trust & Savings Bank v. Easley

176 Tenn. 185 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1940

Counsel for the defendants rely on New England Bond and Mortgage Co. v. Brock, 270 Mass., 107 , 169 N. E., 803 , 68 A. L. R., 371, and Ware v. Brown, Fed. Cas., No. 17170, 2 Bond, 267 . … Tbe statute means just wbat it says, as tbis court bas recognized in Fort v. Dixie Oil Co., 170 Tenn., 464 , 95 S. W. (2d), 931; Carr v. City of Knoxville, 144 Tenn., 483 , 234 S. W., 328 , 19 A. L.

Young ex rel. estate of Young v. Kennedy

429 S.W.3d 536 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2013

Oct. 2, 2009) (citing Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn.1997)). … Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn.1997); Mason v. Seaton, 942 S.W.2d 470, 472 (Tenn.1997).

Brewington v. Brewington

215 Tenn. 475 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1965

Article I, Sec. 17, Constitution of Tennessee; Code Section 8634; Scates v. Board of Commissioners of Union City, 196 Tenn. 274 , 265 S.W.2d 563 ; Phillips v. Marion County, 166 Tenn. 83 , 59 S.W.2d 507 ; Quinton v. … Board of Claims, 165 Tenn. 201 , 54 S.W.2d 953 ; Insurance Co. v. Craig, 106 Tenn. 621 , 62 S.W. 155 ; Moore v. Tate, 87 Tenn. 725 , 11 S.W. 935 , 10 Am.St.Rep. 712 .” 199 Tenn. at 328 , 286 S.W.2d at 869 .

Wright v. Dufield

61 Tenn. 218 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1872

Anderson v. J. W. … In Smith v.

Saylor v. Trotter

148 Tenn. 359 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1923

In Duplin County Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 566 , 17 S. E., 485 , the sheriff collected certain school money and was sued for the same by the school board. … He defended on the ground that the act under which the school board claimed was unconstitutional, but inasmuch as he had proceeded under this act he could not assert its invalidity. In Spokane County v.

Mayor of Morristown v. Hamblen County

136 Tenn. 242 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1916

As said *246 in Keith v. Funding Board, 127 Tenn., 441, 464 , 155 S. W., 142 , 148 (Ann. … Clinton v. Henry County, 115 Mo., 557 , 22 S. W., 494 , 37 Am. St. Rep., 415 ; Board of Improvement v. Little Rock School District, 56 Ark., 354, 19 S. W., 969 , 16 L. R. A., 418, 35 Am. St. Rep., 108 .

Siegel v. Holland

171 Tenn. 327 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1937

Ed., 195 , and Grundy County v. … hearing before the board of the issues involved.

Bayless v. Estes

48 Tenn. 78 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870

In the case of Jones v. … there could be no just exception, but the plaintiff below was permitted to introduce as rebutting testimony against objection that previous to the arrest in question, in February, 1863, he was brought before an examining board

Brentwood Liquors Corp. of Williamson Cty. v. Fox

496 S.W.2d 454 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1973

Milam, 191 Tenn. 54 , 231 S.W.2d 381 (1950); Wilson v. Beeler, 193 Tenn. 213 , 245 S.W.2d 620 (1951); Board of Education of Memphis v. Shelby County, 207 Tenn. 330 , 339 S.W.2d 569 (1960). Southern v. … The opinion in the Marshall County case does not cite State v. Nashville C. & St. L. Railroad opinion. The other two cases we have cited, Wilson v. Beeler, supra, and Board of Education of Memphis v.

Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Jackson

713 S.W.2d 899 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1986

Moore v. State

943 S.W.2d 878 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1997

V O S S M I C H A E L E . … See Brown v. State, 574 S.W.2d 57 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1978) and State v. Rollins, 605 S.W.2d 828 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1980).

State ex rel. Johnson v. Llewelyn

199 Tenn. 292 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1955

Lea v. Brown, 166 Tenn. 669, 680, 681 , 64 S. W. (2d) 841, 844 , 91 A. L. … Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police, 245 U. S. 128 , 38 S. Ct. 41, 43 , 62 L. Ed. 193 .” The contention of relator that this case has no application is without merit.

State ex rel. Jordan v. Bomar

217 Tenn. 494 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1965

Adams v. Russell, 179 Tenn. 428, 430 , 167 S.W.2d 5, 6 . See also State ex rel Grandstaff v. Gore, 182 Tenn. 94, 98 , 184S.W.2d 366; State ex rel. Holbrook v. Bomar, 211 Tenn. 243, 246 , 364 S.W.2d 887 . … Baldwin v.

Rogers v. Battle

163 Tenn. 537 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1931

. *541 In Litterer v. Wright, 151 Tenn., 210 , First National Bank of Ripley v. Barbee, 150 Tenn., 356, McGannon v. … Brown v. Taylor, 115 Tenn., 1 . In this connection, petitioner relies on Rich v. Scales, 116 Tenn., 57 , and Schwartz v. Black, 131 Tenn., 360 .

Galbreath v. State

187 Tenn. 669 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1948

The question was again made in Page v. … As illustrative of this'policy is the holding of this Court in Brown v. State, 121 Tenn. 186, 193 , 114 S.

Cagle Ex Rel. Cagle v. Benton County

181 Tenn. 235 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 6, 1944

Wismer et al. v. J. C. … “In Hope v. Hamilton County, 101 Tenn. [325], 331, 47 S.