Case law

State ex rel. Nealis v. Nolan

76 Tenn. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1881

The cases and items due for board, as aforesaid, are as follows — setting out each case, wiph the amount due. … The cases of Akers and Union Publishing Co. v. Burch, comptroller, 12 Heis., 613, and State, etc., ex rel. Marchbanks v.

Roberts v. Roane County

160 Tenn. 109 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1929

State v. Kerby, 136 Tenn., 386 . In Peters v. … In Saylor v.

State v. McCandless

208 Tenn. 103 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

Further, that in such a situation the statement of Judge Cook is applicable which appears in Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. … Co. v. Smith, 147 Tenn. 453 , 249 S.W. 377 ; and Board of Equalization v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., 148 Tenn. 676 , 257 S.W. 91 .

State v. Hudson

562 S.W.2d 416 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1978

The recent case of Brown v. … I advert to the quotation from Brown v.

Hicks v. Rhea County

189 Tenn. 383 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1949

For example, the Chancellor found, and we agree with that finding, that under the present Act, the Finance and Purchasing Commission thereby created, has for its function with regard to the Board of Education or School Board … of education, purchasing boards or committees.”

Jaco v. State

120 S.W.3d 828 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2003

State v. Wilson, 31 S.W.3d 189, 194 (Tenn. 2001). The cases of Boykin v. Alabama and State v. Mackey are the landmark constitutional cases for analyses of guilty pleas. Boykin v. … Actual release is a decision left to the parole board. Mr. Jaco was correctly informed of his release eligibility date.

Craig v. Mayor and Aldermen

168 Tenn. 413 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1935

Undoubtedly the mayor and board of aldermen had the power to regulate the hours of opening and closing pool rooms, but this board cannot, under the guise of regulation, prohibit to a material degree the exercise of the privilege … In Grills v.

State v. Hensley

159 Tenn. 689 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1929

Railroad v. Johnson, 114 Tenn., 632 ; Board of Equalization v. N., C. & St. L. Ry., 148 Tenn., 676 ; Mullins v. Tennessee Stave & Lumber Co., 155 Tenn., 132 . … Railroad v. Johnson, supra. Reviewing and following the earlier cases, in Board of Equalization v.

State Ex Rel. Morris v. City of Nashville

207 Tenn. 672 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

In the Georgia case (Kimsey v. … State ex rel v. Board of Education of Blount County, 122 Tenn. 161 , 121 S.W. 499 .

Murray v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

46 S.W.3d 171 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 16, 2001

Brown v. Canterbury Corp., 844 S.W.2d 134, 136 (Tenn. 1992). … See Brown, 844 S.W.2d at 137.

Saylors v. Saylors

50 Tenn. 525 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1871

Brown for $230, and pay the same for me, or stay it, if sued upon same. … In Williams v.

Dayton v. Coal & Iron Co.

99 Tenn. 578 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1897

Harris v. State, 96 Tenn., 496 . … Franklin Co. v. Railroad, supra. Fragmentary assessments, made by local Assessors, of such property could not be otherwise than unequal and unsatisfactory.

Bowling v. Carnahan

171 Tenn. 26 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1937

One Yaughan re *28 ceived 1,009 votes, Brown received 674' votes, Carnahan and Smotherman each received 642 votes, and petitioner Bowling received 637' votes. Vaughan and Brown accordingly were elected without question. … Johnston v. State, supra. In addition to the two authorities just cited, we are referred to State ex rel. Brown v. Boden, 51 N. J.

Midgett v. Smith

591 S.W.2d 765 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1979

Review in the Circuit Court is de novo; the trial judge is required “to make an independent judgment on the merits” and, in effect, “substitut[es] his judgment for that of the beer board.” Cantrell v. … DeKalb County Beer Board, 213 Tenn. 568, 572 , 376 S.W.2d 480, 482 (1964). See also, Lones v. Blount County Beer Board, 538 S.W.2d 386 (Tenn.1976).

Cutler-Hammer v. Crabtree

54 S.W.3d 748 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 7, 2001

Co. v. Dowdy, 560 S.W.2d 619, 621 (Tenn. 1978) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 350 S.W.2d 65, 69 (1961)). … Jose v.

Reinhart v. State

193 Tenn. 15 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1951

Cronan v. State, 113 Tenn. 539 , 82 S. W. 477 ; Patmore v. State, 152 Tenn. 281 , 277 S. W. 892 . The final insistence is that Mr. … In McCanless v. Evans, 177 Tenn. 86 , 146 S.

Tidwell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

520 S.W.2d 721 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1975

To this end it entered into an agreement with the Industrial Development Board of Union City. … The entire physical establishment is owned by the Board, with the bond issue being amortized by rental proceeds.

Robert Bean, Franklin Shaffer, David Autrey v. Ned Ray McWherter in his capacity as Governor of the State of Tennessee, - Concurring

953 S.W.2d 197 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1997

Tasco v. Long, 368 S.W.2d 65, 68-69 (1963). … In Tasco v.

Mitchell v. Chattanooga Savings Bank

126 Tenn. 669 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1912

In Brown v. … Tn Hays v.

Hays v. Bright

58 Tenn. 325 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

.death, and provides only for her dominion over it during coverture, the right of her husband as survivor is • a fixed and stable right, over which the court has no control, and of which he cannot be divested : Stewart v. … Stewart, Y. & C., 246; Brown v. Brown, 6 Hum., 129 .