Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.66s
Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.
134 U.S. 530 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1890
S. 361 ; Mellen v. Moline Iron Works, 131 U. S. 352 ; Barbour v. Exchange Bank, 45 Ohio State, 133 ; Rouse, Trustee, v. Bank, 46 Ohio State, 493 . … It. was held in Lewis v.
Cited 102 timesPublished155 U.S. 488 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 10, 1894
The Chief Justice : The judgment is reversed with costs, and the case remanded with a direction to remand it to the City Court of Birmingham, county of Jefferson, Alabama, on the authority of Chappell v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedFarrar and Brown v. United States
30 U.S. 373 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1831
The next questions to be considered are those presented by the bill of exceptions, and of these, that which goes to the sufficiency of the certificate, has already been disposed of in the case of John Smith T. v.
Cited 67 timesPublishedBrown Shoe Co. v. United States
370 U.S. 294 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 25, 1962
(Kinney), and the Brown Shoe Company, Inc. (Brown), through an exchange of Kinney for Brown stock, would violate § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. S. C. § 18 . … See, e. g., Cobble-dick v. United States, 309 U. S. 323, 326 ; Market Street R. Co. v. Railroad Comm’n, 324 U. S. 548, 552 ; Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 334 U. S. 62, 69 ; Cohen v.
Cited 1,765 timesPublishedBrown, Adm'x, Etc. v. United States
113 U.S. 568 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 1, 1884
In Edwards v. … But if there had been any irregularity or defect in the report of the board it was the duty of Brown to object to it without unreasonable delay.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWestern Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown
196 U.S. 502 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 20, 1905
The record, we think, sufficiently presented á claim, of Federal right, Home for Incurables v. New York, 187 U. S. 155 , and the objection to the jurisdiction is therefore overruled. … Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473, 486 .
Cited 96 timesPublishedJacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.
513 U.S. 989 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 7, 1994
Cited 22 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown v. Minneapolis Electric Steel Castings Co.
460 U.S. 1045 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 21, 1983
Cited 32 timesPublishedNo opinion textWilliam & James Brown & Co. v. McGran
39 U.S. 479 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1840
spring of 1833, M‘Gran, a merchant in Georgia, shipped two hundred bales of cotton, consigned to the plaintiffs in error, a house of trade in Liverpool, England, there doing business under the firm of William and James Brown … That Brown, Brothers, and Company’s draft was not due, does not alter the case. We had become responsible some months before by Brown, Brothers, and Company’s acceptance of the draft of the shippers.”
Cited 76 timesPublishedEquitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
187 U.S. 308 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 1, 1902
Chanute v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210 ; Richardson v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 169 U. S. 128 ; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. … Trader, Richardson v. Louisville and *315 Nashville R. R. Co., and Blythe v. Hinckley, supra.
Cited 75 timesPublished438 U.S. 901 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 26, 1978
Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York, 436 U. S. 658 (1978).
Cited 95 timesPublished525 U.S. 888 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1998
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Union Bank of Florida
45 U.S. 465 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 12, 1846
Cited 8 timesPublished536 U.S. 971 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 28, 2002
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textPalmer Clay Products Co. v. Brown
297 U.S. 227 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 10, 1936
In the Municipal Court of Boston, Matthew Brown, trustee in bankruptcy of Metropolitan Builders’ Supply Company, brought this action against Palmer Clay Prod-. ucts Company, to recover as preferences amounts received on account … Affirmed. 1 See Mansfield Lumber Co. v. Sternberg, 38 F. (2d) 614; Haas v. Sachs, 68 F. (2d) 623. Also, Eyges v. Boylston Nat. Bank, 294 Fed. 286 (D. Mass.); Jentzer v. Viscose Co. (S. D. N. Y.), 13 F.
Cited 156 timesPublishedLateef v. Virginia Parole Board
523 U.S. 1142 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 1998
Cited 28 timesPublishedNo opinion textIllinois State Board of Education v. Board of Education
484 U.S. 829 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1987
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown v. Martin Correctional Institution
532 U.S. 1024 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 14, 2001
Cited 6 timesPublished137 S. Ct. 579 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 5, 2016
See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 , 113 S.Ct. 397 , 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Camden County Counsel
562 U.S. 900 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna