Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersscotus

10,000+ results

3.66s

  • Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.

    134 U.S. 530 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 1890

    S. 361 ; Mellen v. Moline Iron Works, 131 U. S. 352 ; Barbour v. Exchange Bank, 45 Ohio State, 133 ; Rouse, Trustee, v. Bank, 46 Ohio State, 493 . … It. was held in Lewis v.

    Cited 102 timesPublished
  • East Lake Land Co. v. Brown

    155 U.S. 488 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 10, 1894

    The Chief Justice : The judgment is reversed with costs, and the case remanded with a direction to remand it to the City Court of Birmingham, county of Jefferson, Alabama, on the authority of Chappell v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Farrar and Brown v. United States

    30 U.S. 373 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1831

    The next questions to be considered are those presented by the bill of exceptions, and of these, that which goes to the sufficiency of the certificate, has already been disposed of in the case of John Smith T. v.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Brown Shoe Co. v. United States

    370 U.S. 294 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 25, 1962

    (Kinney), and the Brown Shoe Company, Inc. (Brown), through an exchange of Kinney for Brown stock, would violate § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U. S. C. § 18 . … See, e. g., Cobble-dick v. United States, 309 U. S. 323, 326 ; Market Street R. Co. v. Railroad Comm’n, 324 U. S. 548, 552 ; Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma, 334 U. S. 62, 69 ; Cohen v.

    Cited 1,765 timesPublished
  • Brown, Adm'x, Etc. v. United States

    113 U.S. 568 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 1, 1884

    In Edwards v. … But if there had been any irregularity or defect in the report of the board it was the duty of Brown to object to it without unreasonable delay.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown

    196 U.S. 502 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 20, 1905

    The record, we think, sufficiently presented á claim, of Federal right, Home for Incurables v. New York, 187 U. S. 155 , and the objection to the jurisdiction is therefore overruled. … Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473, 486 .

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.

    513 U.S. 989 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 7, 1994

    Cited 22 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Minneapolis Electric Steel Castings Co.

    460 U.S. 1045 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 21, 1983

    Cited 32 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • William & James Brown & Co. v. McGran

    39 U.S. 479 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1840

    spring of 1833, M‘Gran, a merchant in Georgia, shipped two hundred bales of cotton, consigned to the plaintiffs in error, a house of trade in Liverpool, England, there doing business under the firm of William and James Brown … That Brown, Brothers, and Company’s draft was not due, does not alter the case. We had become responsible some months before by Brown, Brothers, and Company’s acceptance of the draft of the shippers.”

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown

    187 U.S. 308 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 1, 1902

    Chanute v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210 ; Richardson v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co., 169 U. S. 128 ; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. … Trader, Richardson v. Louisville and *315 Nashville R. R. Co., and Blythe v. Hinckley, supra.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Thurston v. Dekle

    438 U.S. 901 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 26, 1978

    Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York, 436 U. S. 658 (1978).

    Cited 95 timesPublished
  • Brown v. North Carolina

    525 U.S. 888 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1998

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Union Bank of Florida

    45 U.S. 465 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 12, 1846

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Board v. United States

    536 U.S. 971 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 28, 2002

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Palmer Clay Products Co. v. Brown

    297 U.S. 227 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 10, 1936

    In the Municipal Court of Boston, Matthew Brown, trustee in bankruptcy of Metropolitan Builders’ Supply Company, brought this action against Palmer Clay Prod-. ucts Company, to recover as preferences amounts received on account … Affirmed. 1 See Mansfield Lumber Co. v. Sternberg, 38 F. (2d) 614; Haas v. Sachs, 68 F. (2d) 623. Also, Eyges v. Boylston Nat. Bank, 294 Fed. 286 (D. Mass.); Jentzer v. Viscose Co. (S. D. N. Y.), 13 F.

    Cited 156 timesPublished
  • Lateef v. Virginia Parole Board

    523 U.S. 1142 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 1998

    Cited 28 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Illinois State Board of Education v. Board of Education

    484 U.S. 829 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Martin Correctional Institution

    532 U.S. 1024 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 14, 2001

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Thornton v. Brown

    137 S. Ct. 579 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 5, 2016

    See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 , 113 S.Ct. 397 , 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Camden County Counsel

    562 U.S. 900 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.