use of timecard to rebut claim that the defendant had been dropping witness off at work at time of robbery simply refuted credibility; it did not place the defendant at scene of crime and thus disclosure was not required
How later courts described this case
- use of timecard to rebut claim that the defendant had been dropping witness off at work at time of robbery simply refuted credibility; it did not place the defendant at scene of crime and thus disclosure was not required
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
This record has no opinion text. It is a disposition such as a denial of certiorari, kept so the case can be found by name and citation.