Case law

United States v. Kenstler

250 F. Supp. 833 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1966

Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 296 , 50 S.Ct. 253 , 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930); Singer v. United States, 380 U.S. 24, 33, 36 , 85 S.Ct. 783 , 13 L.Ed.2d 630 (1965). … Defendant concedes that in fact he did not report but contends that the Draft Board’s order was void. Such disregard of an outstanding (even though invalid) order is often risky. Poulos v. State of N.

Wisniewski v. Pittsburgh, Chartiers & Youghiogheny Railway Co.

379 F. Supp. 297 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1974

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia, 415 F.2d 403 (5th Cir. 1969). … No. 542, the award entered by said Board should be affirmed.

Neel v. Blythe

42 F. 457 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1890

Wilson Layman, a witness for the libelant, who was on board the steamer Stella, which was tied to the outside of the libelants’ fleet, the head of which fleet was 200 feet below the foot of defendants’ fleet, states that … Brown v. French, 104 Pa. St. 604. Their own property was at stake, and they were moved by the powerful stimulus of self-interest to do whatever was possible to save their fleet.

Engel v. United States

400 F. Supp. 5 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1975

The government cites in support of its position the recent case of Perry et al. v. United States, 520 F.2d 235 [4th Cir. 1975], and Van Zandt v. … The court finds that this case is controlled by the decision of Brown v. Commissioner, 180 F.2d 926 [3rd Cir. 1950] which held against the government on similar facts of this argument.

United States v. Hamilton

322 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1971

United States v. Franco, 413 F.2d 282 (5th Cir. 1969). The jury was so instructed. … Peel v. United States, 316 F.2d 907, 911 (5th Cir. 1963), cert, denied, Crane v. United States, 375 U.S. 896 , 84 S.Ct. 174 , 11 L.Ed.2d 125 (1963) and Zane v.

Braden v. University of Pittsburgh

392 F. Supp. 118 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1975

Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, supra. •Jf -Jr “X* ■$£ ■3f “We also find absent in the instant case the symbiotic relationship presented in Burton v. … It is further ordered, for the reasons set forth in Braden v.

Lees v. West Greene School District

632 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1986

Johnson v. Lincoln Univ., 776 F.2d 443 , 450 (3d Cir.1985) (quoting Trotman v. … Slander Plaintiff alleges that the school board President made a defamatory statement about her during the January, 1984 board meeting at which the board voted not to approve Plaintiff for the substitute teachers’ list.

United States v. Arnal

218 F. Supp. 814 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1963

As stated by Judge Lord in United States v. … We agreed that we would split today’s play of $2 across the board ($6 total) on Gray Topper in the sixth at Wheeling.

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Blue Cross of Western Penn.

298 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1969

(United States v. Rock Royal Co-op., 307 U.S. 533 , 59 S.Ct. 993 , 83 L.Ed. 1446 ; Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ). … Wiggins Airways, Inc. v.

REED

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2026

Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … Brown Christopher B.

Clark v. United States

370 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1974

United States v. Brown, 413 F.2d 878 (9th Cir. 1969). Section 2255, by its terms, applies to all prisoners serving federal sentences who claim their sentences are “subject to collateral attack.” See: Kyle v. … See: Smith v. United States, 309 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1962) ; Hilderbrand v. United States, *95 304 F.2d 716 (10th Cir. 1962) ; United States v.

Luzadder v. Despatch Oven Co.

651 F. Supp. 239 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1986

Thompson-Yeager, Inc., 260 N.W.2d 548, 554 (Minn.1977) (furnace); Brown v. … Luzerne Apparel Manufacturing Corp., 356 Pa.Super. 148 , 514 A.2d 188 (1986) the court concluded that a testing laboratory’s approval of the design of an electrical panel board was equivalent to designing the panel board

United States v. Liberato

109 F. Supp. 588 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1953

United *590 States v. Zieber, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 90 ; United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 455 . … United States v. Nugent, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 46 .

Mills v. Larson

56 F.R.D. 63 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1972

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 183 , 81 S.Ct. 473, 482 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492, 503 (1961); McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Damico v. … The warden is subject to removal by the board as are his subordinates. 61 Purdons P.S. 411, Comm. ex rel. Bunch v. Beattie, 364 Pa. 752 , 73 A.2d 664 (1950).

EAST OHIO CAPITAL, LLC v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 2024

) 2:23-CV-681 Plaintiff, ) ) v. … The Zoning Board of Adjustment scheduled a hearing on May 17, 2018 to review the requests. at ¶ 31. In May of 2018, LaShawn M. Burton-Faulk sat on the ZBA and NSLC’s board. , ¶¶ 33-34.

Sadler v. Union R. Co.

123 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1954

See also Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 7 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 294 . In Allain v. National Railroad Adjustment Board, D.C.I11.1953, 120 F.Supp. 453 , affirmed Allain v. … Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , at pages 734 and 738, 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 ; Allain v. National Railroad Adjustment Board, supra.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Sebastian

368 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1972

See Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 , 91 S.Ct. 849 , 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971); Louisiana v. United States, 380 U.S. 145 , 85 S.Ct. 817 , 13 L.Ed.2d 709 (1964); Cas *856 tro v. … Beecher, 459 F.2d 725 (1st Cir. 1972); Carter v. Gallagher, 452 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1971), reheard, 452 F.2d 327 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 950 , 92 S.Ct. 2045 , 32 L.Ed.2d 338 (1972).

Zurchin v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist.

300 F. Supp. 3d 681 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2018

After word circulated that Defendant Padgett was going to shoot Plaintiff at a future board meeting, police were present at subsequent board proceedings. ( Id. at ¶¶ 52-53). … Mar. 16, 2017) (denying motion to dismiss because "[i]t remain[ed] an open question whether [a school board trustee] was operating within the scope of his authority"); Hall v. Easton Area Sch.

CHRISTOPHER PETERMAN v. RANDY IRWIN, Superintendent at SCI-Forest, and PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2026

See Roman v. … (emphasis added); Shoop v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, 2025 WL 2178422, at *6 (M.D. Pa. July 31, 2025) (“The Parole Board has vast discretion to refuse or deny parole.”) (citing 61 Pa.C.S. § 6137(a)(1)).

Estate of Baird Ex Rel. Baird v. Teamsters Affiliates Pension Plan

317 F. Supp. 2d 588 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2004

In Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. … Stoetzner v. U.S.