Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
0.54s
CLARKE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2024
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153- 54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2024
Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 178 (Pa. … Lawrence v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 2026
Brown v. Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009). … Brown v. Stars Interactive Holdings (IOM) Ltd., 617 S.W.3d 792, 810 (Ky. 2020). V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTATEL v. MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2023
Board of Educ., Island Trees Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 26 v. … In West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), the Supreme Court held a board of education could not compel a student to salute the flag or recite the pledge of allegiance.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOLIVERI v. RIVERSIDE CARE CENTER
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2023
On July 10, 2020, Mark Fox, liaison between Riverside and its Board of Directors, sent an email to Mr. Kovski expressing his concerns that Riverside’s usage of a staffing agency at 30% was too high. … Moore v. City of Phila., 461 F.3d 331, 342 (3d Cir. 2006). Under this framework, the plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case of retaliation. Young v. City of Phila. Police Dep’t, 651 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 2026
Polk County v. … .”); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2026
Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 216 (2007). As such, the defendant has the burden of pleading and proving that the prisoner failed to exhaust available administrative remedies. Brown v. … See, e.g., Mitchell v. Horn, 318 F.3d 523, 530 (3d Cir. 2003); Rauser v. Horn, 241 F.3d 330, 333 (3d Cir. 2001).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2025
Moore v. Tartler, 986 F.2d 682, 685 (3d Cir. 1993); Clement v. Consol. Rail Corp., 963 F.2d 599, 600 (3d Cir. 1992); White v. Westinghouse Elec. Co., 862 F.2d 56, 59 (3d Cir. 1988). … .”); Arellano-Garcia v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 2024
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See Salles v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 229 Fed. Appx. 140, 145 n.2 (3d Cir. 2007); Lee v. Astrue, Civ. No. 06-5167, 2007 WL 1101281, at *3 n.5 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2007); Lyons v. Barnhart, Civ.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2024
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Matthews v. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). See also Rutherford, 399 F.3d at 553 (holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case).
Cited 0 timesUnknown68 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1946
Macy & Co., Inc. v. … Wolf Bros. v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 8 Cir., 206 F. 611 ; Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. Marcus et al., D.C., 36 F.Supp. 90 ; Isador Straus et al., t/a R. H. Macy & Co., v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedYHELKA v. YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2021
Jodi Lumley, and Ashley Shirley (collectively “Plaintiffs”) allege that they were “the subject of discrimination for reporting unwarranted and abusive conduct by their direct supervisor, Defendant Curt Peffer, to the Board … Connolly v. Lane Constr. Corp., 809 F.3d 780, 789 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 510 (2002) and Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside, 578 F.3d 203, 213 (3d Cir. 2009)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2024
According to the Court of Appeals, unauthorized motions used by litigants in place of procedures recognized under state law, like the notice of appeal nunc pro tunc held ineffective in Brown v. … Satterfield v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2022
Geis v. Board of Educ. of ParsippanyTroy Hills, Morris Cnty., 774 F.2d 575, 580 (3d Cir.1985); accord Hafer v. Melo, 502 USS. 21, 25 (1991). … Erb v. Judge, 1994 WL 523203, at *2 (E.D.Pa. Sept.23, 1994); cf. Callahan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWILEY v. UNION POLICE OFFICER "PETRO"
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2024
finding that officer’s placement of knee on back of arrestee for no more than eight seconds to disarm arrestee of knife and effectuate lawful arrest did not violate a clearly established right); see also Brown … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownL. H. v. RICE ENTERPRISES, LLC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2023
In Pacor, Inc. v. … Nuveen High Yield Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown PC, 692 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 2012). “Certainty, or even likelihood of effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy, is not a requirement.” Copelin v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
425 F. Supp. 461 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1976
See: Mourning v. … See: Ives v. W. T. Grant Company, 522 F.2d 749, 761 (2d Cir. 1975); Kenney v. Landis Financial Group, Inc., supra, at page 950.
Reversed by Richard Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Company, 566 F.2d 437 (1977)Cited 5 timesPublishedNIFTY HOME PRODUCTS, INC. v. LADYNANA US
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2023
See, e.g., Pike Brands LLC v. Teegem, 22-cv-171 (December 5, 2022)(Colville, J); Broadway Pine Brands LLC v. Cococity, No. 22-cv-510 (November 30, 2022)(Ranjan, J); Broadway Pine Brands LLC v. … (citing Brown v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 282 F.2d 522, 527 (3d Cir. 1960) (citations omitted)); see also 11 Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller Mary K.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2026
Matthews v. Apfel, 239 F.3d 589, 594 (3d Cir. 2001). … Szubak, 745 F.2d at 833 (quoting Brown v. Schweiker, 557 F. Supp. 190, 192 (MLD. Fla. 1983)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2022
Shortly thereafter, Syght initiated an action in the District of Colorado against the Partees for allegedly false and misleading representations they made to Syght’s executive team, board and investors located in Colorado … Villari Brandes & Kline, P.C. v. Plainfield Specialty Holdings II, Inc., No. CIV.A 09-2552, 2009 WL 1845236 at *5 (E.D. Pa. June 26, 2009) (citingPrudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Rodano, 493 F. Supp. 954, 95 (E.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna