Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspawd

4,323 results

1.01s

  • FITZGERALD v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2024

    Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). … Burkey v. Marberry, 556 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2009) (emphasis added) (quoting Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990), which cited Allen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Burns v. County of Cambria, Pa.

    764 F. Supp. 1031 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1991

    Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Brown v. Reardon, 770 F.2d 896, 905 (10th Cir.1985); Nekolny v. Painter, 653 F.2d 1164 (7th Cir.1981). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1970); Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Story v. Morgan

    786 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1992

    Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat, 452 U.S. 458, 467 , 101 S.Ct. 2460, 2465 , 69 L.Ed.2d 158 (1981). … Benjamin v. Potter, 635 F.Supp. 243 (D. Virgin Islands 1986), aff'd. (per curiam) 838 F.2d 1205 (3d Cir.1988) (citations and footnote omitted); see also Brown v. Smith, 580 F.Supp. 1576 (M.D.Pa.1984).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • GIBSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 2024

    Lanzillo PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF ) PAROLE AND PROBATION and ) SUPERINTENDENT LEE J. … Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LAFFERTY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2024

    Kelly PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF Re. ECF No. 20 PROBATION AND PAROLE; ) TED JOHNSON Chairman; SHAWN ) ADAMCZYK Parole Agent; and ) STEVEN A. … Bell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • IQBAL v. BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 2024

    § 1983, Plaintiff challenged the November 2, 2020 order of the Pennsylvania Board of Professional and Occupational Affairs (“BPOA”) and the State Board of Medicine (“the Board”) that revoked his license to practice … Stridiron v. Stridiron, 698 F.2d 204, 206-07 (3d Cir. 1983). Furthermore, “the evidence must be clear and convincing.” Floorgraphics Inc. v. News Am. Mktg. In-Store Servs., Inc., 434 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • IQBAL v. BPOA, PA STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2023

    See Kelly v. … See West v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ECKMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2022

    Cercone v. ) Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan ) PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF ) … See Tice v. Wilson, 425 F. Supp. 2d 676, 680 (W.D. Pa. 2006); see also Fed. R. Civ.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Monborne v. United Mine Workers of America

    342 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1972

    Brown, 343 F.2d 872 (10th Cir. 1965) held that a plaintiff need not exhaust intraunion remedies before bringing suit under § 304 of LMRDA. The Brown decision was cited with approval by the Third Circuit in Purcell v. … See Antal v. Dist. 5 UMW, 451 F.2d 1187 (3d Cir. 1971) aff’g, 334 F.Supp. 903 (W.D.Pa.1971) ; Lavender v. UMW, 285 F.Supp. 809 , 874 (S.D.W.Va.1968) ; United States v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • FIGUEROA v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE AND PROBATION

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2022

    action on March 9, 2022, by submitting a Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”), in which he seeks relief from a decision of Respondent Pennsylvania Board … See McLaughlin v. Zavada, No. 19-422, 2019 WL 5697347, at *1-3 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2019) (discussing prior DC-ADM 803).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hatch v. The Steam-Boat Boston

    3 F. 807 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1880

    United States v. The Queen, *810 supra. … The Avon, 1 Brown’s Adm. Rep. 170, 178. It travels with the thing wherever it goes, and into whosesoever hands it may pass. The Rock Island Bridge, 6 Wall. 213, 215 ; Cutler v. Rae, 7 How. 729 . 4.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh

    375 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1974

    But in Green v. Dumke, 480 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1973); Anthony v. Cleveland, 355 F.Supp. 789 (D.Hawaii 1973); Lee v. Board of Regents, 441 F.2d 1257 (7th Cir. 1971); Brown v. … Also, in at least two recent Supreme Court decisions, Papish v. Board of Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667 , 93 S.Ct. 1197 , 35 L.Ed.2d 618 (1973) and Board of Regents v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh, 538 F.2d 991 (1976)Cited 40 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lena

    497 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1980

    United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364 (8th Cir. 1976). See United States v. Harding, 563 F.2d 299 (6th Cir. 1977). The reasonableness of a victim’s belief that a threat of harm is real is of course a jury question. … The defendant’s statement that Oleszewski could not testify on the question of school board control because he had attended only school board meetings occurring before Lena was on the board is untrue.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Natco Corp. v. Great Lakes Industries, Inc.

    214 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1962

    v. … Brown v. Bullock, D.C.N.Y., 194 F.Supp. 207 . See also Investment Company Act, Section 80a-1(b) (2).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • SCHUTZEUS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 2020

    May 28, 1999) (“The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is an arm of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania entitled to assert the Eleventh Amendment.”); Wood v. Pa. … See Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 221 (3d Cir. 2001) (“In determining whether a legal principle is ‘clearly established,’ if we cannot look to state law, as we cannot, see Doe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BEGANDY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 2021

    His conclusory allegation that the Board retaliated against him is not sufficient to establish it did so. See, e.g., Gibson v. Overmyer, 1:17-cv-188, 2018 WL 889026, *3 (W.D. Pa. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MCCULLOUGH v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2020

    The Board is a part of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and therefore is immune from suit by virtue of the Eleventh Amendment. Spuck v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole, 563 F. … App’x 156, (3d Cir. 2014) (“[T]he Eleventh Amendment affords the Board protection from suit in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”); see also Wyatt v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ZICCARELLI v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 2021

    See Riley v. … See Walker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Malone v. ECONOMY BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY

    669 F. Supp. 2d 582 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2009

    Bd. of County Commissioners of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 (emphasis in original).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • BROWN

    District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2018

    Mindek v. Rigatti, 964 F.2d at 1373. … See Brightwell v. Lehman, 637 F.3d 187, 193 n.7 (3d Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.