Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
1.45s
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2023
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 43 (3d Cir. 2001); Plummer v. Apfel, 186 F.3d 422, 429 (3d Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCARRINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2021
Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. … Morales v. Apfel, 225 F.3d 310, 317 (3d Cir. 2000). See also Dula v. Barnhart, 129 Fed. Appx. 715, 718-19 (3d Cir. 2005).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAssicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Clover
18 F. Supp. 2d 550 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1998
Ciarlante v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 143 F.3d 139 , 145-46 (3d Cir.1998). III. … . *556 In Griffith v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Precast Crypt Co. v. Dy-Core of Pennsylvania, Inc.
785 F. Supp. 1186 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1992
See also NLRB v. Browning Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir.1982). … See Clemens v. Gerber Scientific, Inc., 1989 WESTLAW 3480 (E.D.Pa.); Savin Corp. v. Hervage Copy Products, 661 F.Supp. 463 (M.D.Pa.1987); Parker v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedOwens v. Allegheny Valley School & Northwestern Human Services
869 F. Supp. 2d 653 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2012
Schafer v. Board of Public Education Of the School District Of Pittsburgh, Pa., 903 F.2d 243, 251-52 (3d Cir.1990) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1)). … See Aman v.
Cited 5 timesPublished777 F. Supp. 2d 920 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2011
See also Latella v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 74 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 14, 459 A.2d 464 (1983). … SINGER, SUTHERLAND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION § 51:8 (7th ed. 2008) (citing McKinney v. Foster, 391 Pa. 221 , 137 A.2d 502, 506 (1958)). 15 . See Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2024
Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. … .”); Titterington v. Barnhart, 174 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGriffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation
384 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1974
Blair v. United States Steel Corp., supra. … And, as is stated in Addison v.
Reversed by Thomas W. Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and American Commercial Lines, Inc., 521 F.2d 31 (1975)Cited 7 timesPublishedMORROW v. SOUTH SIDE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2023
See Waiters v. … Bd of Educ. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEMRIT v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2025
July 9, 2025) (exercising courts’ discretion to review merits of complaint before deciding IFP application and noting that court has the authority to dismiss a case at any time) (citing Brown v. … Cf. also Sinwell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2025
Instead, the relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. at 455. … See EEOC v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2022
See also Brooks v. … Pearson, 850 F.3d at 535 (citing Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEAVES v. BENSON LINCOLN MERCURY, INC.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2024
Co., Inc. v. Wood, 592 F.3d 412 (3d Cir. 2010). … .”); Horsch v. Cantymagli, No. 24-CV-1183, 2024 WL 1444020, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2024) (citing Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 2024
Pennsylvania therefore subscribes to a ‘hard rule [of limitations] as a matter of legislative policy.’”, quoting in part, Riddick v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 499 A.2d 694, 696-97. (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1985). … See Walker v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2026
Ghanem v. Warden Essex Cnty. Corr. Facility, No. 21-1908, 2022 WL 574624, at *2 (3d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022); see also Quinteros v. Warden Pike Cnty. Corr. Facility, 784 F. … See Makeshov v. Oddo, No. 3:26-CV-00808-JFC, 2026 WL 1579023, at *1 (W.D. Pa. June 3, 2026) (citing Borbot v. Warden Hudson Cty. Corr. Fac., 906 F.3d 274, 278-79 (3d Cir. 2018)); Modebadze v. Soto, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMILEHAM v. BOROUGH OF BRIDGEWATER
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2024
Linkstrom v. Golden T. Farms, 883 F.2d 269, 269 (3d Cir. 1989). … See United States v. Brown, 658 F. App’x 100, 104 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown657 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1987
The gun is silver-colored; its grip, a brown wood. The clip is silver, about three inches long and a half inch wide. … See also Commonwealth v. Anderson, 481 Pa. 292 , 392 A.2d 1298 (1978); People v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2022
authority,’” Board of Trustees of the University of Ala. v. … Natale v. Camden Cty. Corr. Facility, 318 F.3d 575, 584 (3d Cir. 2003) (quoting Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown246 F. Supp. 173 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1965
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 164-167 , 83 S.Ct. 554 , 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963); cf. United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 456-457 , 85 S.Ct. 1707 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). … See Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 183 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed. 2d 492 (1961). In Monroe v. Pape, as in Basista v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCyclops Corp. v. United States
408 F. Supp. 1287 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1976
v. … Taylor was not a tax refund case, but was an appeal from an order of the Board of Tax Appeals sustaining a deficiency in the taxpayer’s income tax.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna