Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,323 results
0.47s
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2023
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. Supp. 942, 944 (W.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknown242 F. Supp. 746 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1965
In Hamilton v. … In Stack et al. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2026
See Calzado Diaz v. Noem, No. 3:25- cv-458, 2025 WL 3628480 (W.D. Pa. … Calzado Diaz's case); A.D. v. Leonard Oddo et. al., No. CV 25-460J, 2026 WL 101476, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 14, 2026). Respondents also argue under Jennings v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2022
. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See Simmonds v. Heckler, 807 F.2d 54, 58 (3d Cir. 1986); Malloy v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 306 Fed. Appx. 761, 764 (3d Cir. 2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2026
Petitioner filed an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals and her appeal remains pending. (Docket Nos. 1; 10; 16). She has been detained without a bond hearing throughout her removal proceedings. … May 6, 2026); Cunha v. Freden, 2026 WL 1146044 (2d Cir. Apr. 28, 2026); Lopez-Campos, et al. v. Kevin Raycraft, Immigr.
Cited 0 timesUnknown326 F. Supp. 627 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 1971
Under Henry v. … No one has brought forth a resolution of the Board of Directors of Ford Motor Company authorizing anyone to sign documents with Mr.
Cited 5 timesPublishedChakrabarti v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2021
Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & Latimer, 315 F. Supp. 2d 765 (D. Md. 2004) (citing Brown v. Stallworth, 235 F. Supp. 2d 453, 456 (D.Md. 2002) (internal citations omitted)). … In the context of the imminent expiration of the rolled over visas in the present case, see the recent opinion by the Editorial Board of the Washington Post: Green cards are about to go to waste: Will anyone save them?
Cited 0 timesUnknownAetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
771 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1991
Compare Miles v. Tennessee River Pulp and Paper Co., 862 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir.1989) (federal); Foster v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 1304 (5th Cir.1980) (federal); Oldenburg v. … In Peiffer , a school board refused to grant a school district employee a postponement of a disciplinary hearing pending the disposition of criminal charges against the employee arising out of the same incident.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 2026
United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 (1989). … Kossler v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWinner International Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.
889 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1994
Co. v. Advanced Interventional Systems, Inc., 824 F.Supp. 583, 586 (E.D.Va.1993); National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Siliconix, Inc., 729 F.Supp. 77, 79-80 (N.D.Ca.1989); Bank of the West v. … Co. v. Brown, 834 F.Supp. 854, 857 (E.D.Pa.1993). As noted above, the jury in the Ohio action returned a verdict of liability only as to Mr. Johnson’s claim for unjust enrichment.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2022
Control over parole for all state sentences rests with the Pennsylvania Parole Board, formerly the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. … If an aggregate sentence is a state sentence the Parole Board and not the Common Pleas Court makes the decision to parole. Commonwealth v. Tilghman, 673 A.2d 898 (Pa.1996).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 2024
Prot. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc., No. 2:05-cv-885, 2007 WL 2253554, at *1 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2007) (quoting Anderson v. City of Bessemer, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985)). … Brown v. Spyker, 2020 WL 13890719, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2020) (citing Muhammad v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 385 Fed. App’x 70, 73 (3d Cir. 2010) (nonprecedential)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCimador v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
645 F. Supp. 1273 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1986
v. … In Mitchell v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC. v. BABICH
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2024
Ameriserv asserts that confidential information was given to Driver in connection with Driver’s efforts to nominate potential board members for election to Ameriserv’s Board and to support litigation lodged against Ameriserv … See also McTernan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPODLUCKY v. THE LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 2023
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii); Brown v. Sage, 941 F.3d 655, 659 (3d Cir. 2019). … (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)); Spell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 2020
Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 928 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Brown ». Barrow, 512 F.3d 1304, 1307 (11th Cir. 2008)). “[L]ack of legal knowledge or legal training does not alone justify equitable tolling.” Jd. … (citing Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 774 3d Cir. 2003)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2022
Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. … Brown v. Kijakazi, No. CV 21-89-E, 2022 WL 4338279, at *1 n.2 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 19, 2022). Not only that, but Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknown724 F. Supp. 1538 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1989
NLRB v. Browning Ferris Industries, 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3rd Cir.1982). The "single employer" doctrine is a theory unique to labor law. Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 v. … Pratt-Farnsworth, 690 F.2d 489 , 504 (5th Cir.1982), NLRB v. Browning-Ferris, supra.
Cited 17 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2025
The Disciplinary Board charges counsel with violating the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and requests the appointment of a Hearing Committee to recommend appropriate disciplinary action. … Seymour’s counsel told the Court that the 1 See Off. of Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGRIFFIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2024
See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. … See Wilkinson v. Commissioner Social Sec., 558 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna