Case law

Kosnosky v. Richardson

328 F. Supp. 1365 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1971

v. … Bittel v. Richardson, 441 F.2d 1193 (3d Cir. 1971); Cf. Branham v.

Englert v. City of McKeesport

637 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1986

McKeesport thus alleges that its conduct falls within the “state action” exemption set forth in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … See Town of Hattie v.

Hall v. Central Medical Pavillion

654 F. Supp. 1156 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1987

See Veno v. Meredith, 357 Pa.Super. 85 , 515 A.2d 571, 577-80 (1986); Martin v. Capital Cities Media, 354 Pa.Super. 199 , 511 A.2d 830, 834-42 (1986); Darlington v. … General Electric, 350 Pa.Super. 183 , 504 A.2d 306 -316-17 (1986); Banas v. Matthews Int’l. Corp., 348 Pa.Super. 464 , 502 A.2d 637 (1985); Richardson v.

BRAMHALL v. DELSANDRO

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2024

Goodman v. Wagner, 553 F. Supp. 255, 258 (E.D. Pa. 1982). … Brown CHRISTOPHER B.

Kelley v. O'Malley

328 F. Supp. 3d 447 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2018

For example, in Dawson v. Brown , 803 F.3d 829 (7th Cir. 2015), the suspect had no weapon and was thus not actively refusing to drop a weapon when commanded by police officers. Plaintiffs also cite Tenorio v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 417-18, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) for its "cogent and concise summary of the three situations in which a policy or custom sufficient to impose liability may arise").

Carnevali v. Heckler

616 F. Supp. 1500 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 1985

Campbell v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (M. Glosser & Sons), 80 Pa.Cmwlth. 148 , 472 A.2d 272, 275 (1984). … Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 479 Pa. 618 , 389 A.2d 42 (1978). This Court also notes that in Grant v.

STANTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2023

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHAD STANTON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:22-cv-1001 v. … The issue here was addressed by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in Dougherty v. Dupes, No. 1:17-CV-01541-JFC, 2018 WL 1696651 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2018).

Mun. Auth. of Westmoreland Cnty. v. CNX Gas Co.

380 F. Supp. 3d 464 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2019

See Melat v. Melat , 411 Pa.Super. 647 , 602 A.2d 380 , 385 (1992) (citing Knight v. Gulf Ref. Co. , 311 Pa. 357 , 166 A. 880 , 882 (1933) ). … See Brown v. City of Pittsburgh , 409 Pa. 357 , 186 A.2d 399 , 401 (1962) ; Camp Ne'er Too Late, LP v. Swepi, LP , 185 F.Supp.3d 517 , 550 (M.D. Pa. 2016) (citing Brown , 186 A.2d at 401 ).

JMJ REALTY, LLC v. JLE INDUSTRIES, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 2020

Co., Inc., v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 2010 WL 2076089, *4 (E.D. Pa. … See Brown v. Grass, 544 Fed. Appx. 81, 85 (3d Cir. Oct. 31, 2013) (unless there are no genuine issues of material fact, “[w]hether a breach is material, of course, is a question of fact for the jury”).

OLEATH v. THE PLUM BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2021

See Angelico v. … See Bright v.

INGRAM v. SCHWAB

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2024

The filing of timely objections requires the district judge to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Sample v. … Ingram’s November 2022 Parole Board interview. The Parole Board denied parole to Mr. Ingram, in November 2022, noting that he had failed to complete the required programs. The Magistrate Judge concluded that Mr.

Roach-Reid Co. v. Hill

76 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1948

Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 332, 339 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 .

McDowell v. Wetterau, Inc.

910 F. Supp. 236 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1995

Cf Com. v. … See Foster v.

Neville v. American Barge Line Co.

182 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1959

Johnson v. United States, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 789 . … Brown v. Dravo Corporation, 3 Cir., 1958, 258 F.2d 704 . The failure to pay maintenance and cure when it is needed is an actionable tort recognized by the Court of Appeals for this Circuit. Sims v.

Precision Printing Co. v. Unisource Worldwide, Inc.

993 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1998

Zoslaw v. MCA Dist. … Unlike other federal antitrust statutes, which focus on harm to competition generally, Brown Shoe Co. v.

Reginella Construction Co. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America

949 F. Supp. 2d 599 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2013

Co. v. … Young v. Kaye, 443 Pa. 335 , 279 A.2d 759, 763 (1971). The party arguing for the fiduciary relationship bears the burden of proving it exists. Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA, 906 A.2d 571, 579 (Pa.Super.2006).

Penelope Bell v. City of Clairton, Duane Ringgold, and Eric Fusco

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2026

(quoting Martin v. Brown, 63 F.3d 1252, 1265 (3d Cir. 1995)). IV. … Such CLE credits shall be in addition to the twelve CLE hours annually required by the Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board. See Contreras Madrid v. Wal- Mart Stores, L.P., No.

Donald Smith v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2025

Brown, United States Magistrate Judge I. … See also Brown v. Pitt Ohio Exp., LLC, No. 12 C 2420, 2013 WL 5221483, at *4 (N.D. Ill.

Hoots v. Pennsylvania

272 F. Supp. 2d 539 · District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 2003

Board of Educ. v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237, 247-48 , 111 S.Ct. 630 , 112 L.Ed.2d 715 (1991); Coalition to Save Our Children v. State Bd. of Educ., 90 F.3d 752, 761 (3d Cir.1996.) … Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 489 , 112 S.Ct. 1430 , 118 L.Ed.2d 108 (1992) (citing Milliken v.

CHAPMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 2022

Ct. 1148, 1153-54 (2019); Jesurum v. Secretary of U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs, 48 F.3d 114, 117 (3d Cir. 1995) (citing Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988)). See also Berry v. Sullivan, 738 F. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). See also Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 553 (3d Cir. 2005) (holding that remand is not necessary where the error would not affect the outcome of the case).