Case law

Stone v. Schl. Dist. of Carbondale

102 Pa. Super. 60 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1931

In Black v. Duquesne Borough School District, 239 Pa. 96 , it was held that the power of filling such vacancies by the School Board is limited strictly under the School Code. … collect school taxes: Black v.

Nether Providence Township School District v. Mercur

46 Pa. Super. 470 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1911

But the school board had in its possession the contract and bond of Galbraith, he was bound by his undertaking and could not withdraw without the consent of the board: School Directors v. McBride, 22 Pa. 215 . … Snyder Township School District, 12 Pa. 204 : School District of McKeesport v. Miller, 1 Pennypacker, 510.

Garrahan v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

149 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1942

Superior Ct. 96 , 160 A. 157 ; James v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 173 A. 485 ; Robertson v. Frank Rieder & Sons et al., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 , 174 A. 604 ; Yannick v. … Superior Ct. 431 , 191 A. 213 ; Kuzmick v. Hudson Coal Co., 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 281 , 5 A. 2d 453 ; Rolling v. *8 Jeddo-Highland Coal Co., 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 153 , 1 A. 2d 135 ; Soroka et ux. v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Wright v. Banmiller

195 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1961

Howard v. Claudy, 172 Pa. … Likewise, the action of the Board of Parole in recommitting a person for violation of parole cannot be reviewed by habeas corpus. Commonwealth ex rel. Biglow v.

Crissman v. Crissman

220 Pa. Super. 387 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 1971

Scarpato v. Scarpato, 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 45 , 151 A. 2d 783 (1959); Commonwealth v. Cooper, 183 Pa. Superior Ct. 36 , 128 A. 2d 181 ( 1956); Commonwealth ex rel. Myerson v. Myerson, 160 Pa. … Miller v. Miller, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 196, 197 , 223 A. 2d 917, 918 (1966); Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown, 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 324, 326-327 , 171 A. 2d 833, 834 (1961); see, Commonwealth ex rel. Lewis v.

Bostic v. DREHER

206 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

See Knight v. Millard, 350 Pa. 17 , 38 A. 2d 264 ; Lackman v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 129 , 208 A. 2d 33 . … The credibility and weight of the testimony was for the Board, and the record discloses no capricious disregard of competent evidence. Cf. Verna v. Stabler, 204 Pa.

Schuch v. Harbison's Dairies, Inc.

150 Pa. Super. 582 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1942

It was also considered by the board as if it were competent. The burden was on claimant , to prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence. Stauffer v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 116 Pa. … As we have so often said, the credibility of the witnesses was solely for the referee and the board. Martz v. Butler County Mushroom Farm, Inc., et al., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 276 , *587 27 A. 2d 765, 767 ; Kennedy v.

Commonwealth v. Mahoningtown Railway Men's Club

140 Pa. Super. 413 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 6, 1940

See Com. v. McMenamin et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 91 , 184 A. 679 . … The opening of a judgment is within the discretion of the lower court and will not be ordered unless it appears that there is a meritorious defense: Com. v. Moeschlin, 314 Pa. 34 , 170 A. 119 ; Com. v.

Commonwealth v. Pander

2014 Pa. Super. 201 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2014

Brown, supra at 582-583 (Pa.Super. 2001) (emphasis added). … Further, as highlighted by the Brown decision, himself is spurious. Its citation to Commonwealth v. Lopez, 739 A.2d 485 (Pa. 1999), is also misplaced as Lopez was not a PCRA case.

American Road Machine Co. v. Township of Washington

9 Pa. Super. 105 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1898

action of the board. … The action needed is not that of the individuals who compose the board, but of the official body: Penna. R. R. Co. v. Mont. Co. Pass. Ry., 167 Pa. 62 ; Pike Co. v. Rowland, 94 Pa. 238 ; Jefferson Co. v.

Leedom v. Spano

436 Pa. Super. 18 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1994

The township zoning board subsequently denied the request for a change in zoning. This decision was appealed and ultimately reversed by our Supreme Court. See Surrick v. … See Brown v. Henry, 106 Pa. 262 (1884) (our Supreme Court rejected a claim that a subsequent purchaser could recover based on a forged satisfaction of a mortgage); Lancaster v.

Commonwealth v. Borek

161 Pa. Super. 200 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1947

In Commonwealth v. Terry, 15 Pa. … board.

Cole v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

197 Pa. Super. 648 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962

The case of Flowers v. … The decree of the lower court affirming the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board is reversed and the record is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Kish v. T. F. Steele Coal Co.

185 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Tbe only question is whether the board’s finding is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Carl v. American Window Glass Co., 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 475 , 33 A. 2d 93 . Dr. … The credibility of medical witnesses and the weight to be attached to the testimony of each are matters finally and exclusively for the board: Kennedy v. Holmes Construction Co., 147 Pa.

Hein v. Ludwig

118 Pa. Super. 152 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1935

Bucher v. American Fruit Growers Co.” ( 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 399 , 163 A. 33 ). The board affirmed the referee. … Where the court’s reversal of the board is on a question of law, there is no need to remit the record for further findings: Berlin v. Crawford, supra; Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199 , 133 A. 256 .

Tallman v. Florey

179 Pa. Super. 354 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Gill v. Fives, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 564 , 88 A. 2d 109 . … Boyle v. Boyle, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 188 , 100 A. 2d 385 .

Harrison v. Alden Park Manor Apartments

160 Pa. Super. 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1946

Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co., 296 Pa. 503 , 146 A. 146 ; Eberst v. Sears Roebuck & Co., supra. … Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 165 , 164 A. 731 . Roeschen v. Dietrich, 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 163 A. 63 , Wilson v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 107 Pa.

Wilson v. United News Transportation Co.

215 Pa. Super. 317 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1969

Mackanitz v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 359 , 43 A. 2d 586 (1945). The findings of the Board were supported by competent evidence. … Even if, for the sake of this argument, the “payment of compensation” is debatable it was for the Board to weigh the evidence and determine the question of fact. Somerton v.

Com. v. Hill, S.

239 A.3d 175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2020

Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 985 A.2d 697, 706-07 (Pa. 2009); see generally Markham v. Wolf, 190 A.3d 1175, 1183 (Pa. 2018). … See Commonwealth v.

Phillips Unemployment Compensation Case

163 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1948

Bodinson Manufacturing Company v. California Employment Commission, 17 Cal. (2d) 321, 109 P. 2d 935 . *378 Appellant was not what President Judge Keller in Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. … Unemployment Compensation Law, .§ 5Í0, 43 PS § 830; Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 65 , 49 A. 2d 872 ; D’Yantone Unemployment Compensation Case, 159 Pa.