Case law

Flank v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.

203 Pa. Super. 474 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1964

As President Judge Rhodes said in MacDonald v. Phila. R. T. Co., 147 Pa. … In Carroll v.

Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co.

152 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1943

The credibility of these medical witnesses and the weight to be attached to the testimony of each were for the consideration of the board, not the court below: Swalm v. J. E. Brokhoff, Inc., 145 Pa. … The findings of fact by the board were conclusive and the court below was without authority to change them: Hamer v. West Virginia Pulp and Paper Co., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 144, 150 , 18 A. 2d 452 ; Thomas v.

Mancuso v. Mancuso

150 Pa. Super. 22 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1942

Superior Ct. 581, 584, 585 , 176 A. 60 ; Corrento v. Ventresca et al., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 358, 363 , 19 A. 2d 746 . Although the board was not bound to accept the testimony of claimant and his physician (Bakaisa v. … Such testimony also supports the eleventh finding of fact of the board. See Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 22, 28, 29 , 15 A. 2d 559 . The conclusion of Judge Cunningham in Eckenroad v.

Carnachione v. HOTEL WILLIAM PENN.

184 Pa. Super. 26 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Barton v. Pgh. Coal Co., 173 A. 678 , 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 454 . … The board may accept or reject in whole or in part the testimony of any witness and the credibility and weight of testimony of one Avho qualifies as an expert are not revieAvable by us. Palady v.

Fitzgerald v. Atlas Asbestos Co.

158 Pa. Super. 151 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1945

Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 333 , 24 A. 2d 51 ; Jaloneck v. Jarecki Mfg. Co. et al., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 609, 615 , 43 A. 2d 430 . … If claimant had any complaint to the board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order, and alleged errors of fact or law arising therefrom, specific objections should have been made thereto. Weyant v.

Caviston v. Lang

152 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1943

returning the record to the board to enter the only judgment possible under its ruling: Apker v. … We said in Hornbake v. Hornbake, 72 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Ruckinger

239 Pa. Super. 520 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1976

Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3148-3149 . … Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3151 .

Holt v. NAVAPRO

2007 Pa. Super. 243 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2007

Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 760 A.2d 863, 868 (Pa.Super.2000), appeal denied, 566 Pa. 632 , 781 A.2d 137 (2001). … Brown, supra at 868 (quoting Bell v. Irace, 422 Pa.Super. 298 , 619 A.2d 365 (1993) (emphasis in original)). Thus, proximate cause “must be established before the question of actual cause may be put to the jury.”

Commonwealth v. Raybuck

2006 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2006

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Cornish, 403 Pa.Super. 492 , 589 A.2d 718, 721 (1991); Commonwealth v. Brown, 402 Pa.Super. 369 , 587 A.2d 6, 7 (1991).

Standish Unemployment Compensation Case

189 Pa. Super. 471 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

Superior Ct. 66, 67 , 60 A. 2d 352 (1948); Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 333 , 24 A. 2d 51 (1942). … Under the evidence, the board was justified in making its findings, conclusions and order. Decision affirmed.

Bednar v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

194 Pa. Super. 10 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

Washko v. Ruckno., Inc., 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 606, 609 , 121 A. 2d 456 . … Boyle v. Boyle, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 188, 190 , 100 A. 2d 385 . See, also, Cairgle v.

Smith v. Kravitz

173 Pa. Super. 11 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1953

floor” and “he was taking up old boards and putting down new boards.” … Hayden v. Second national Bank of Allentown, 331 Pa. 29 , 199 A. 218 ; Bouy v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., 338 Pa. 5 , 12 A. 2d 7 .

Shuda v. Shuda

283 Pa. Super. 253 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1980

Brown v. Brown, 254 Pa.Super. 410 , 386 A.2d 15 (1978). Some cases suggest that this means the parties are still married. E. g., Ponthus v. Ponthus, 70 Pa.Super. 39 (1918). … Brown v.

Com. v. Hill, S.

239 A.3d 175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2020

Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 985 A.2d 697, 706-07 (Pa. 2009); see generally Markham v. Wolf, 190 A.3d 1175, 1183 (Pa. 2018). … See Commonwealth v.

Gasior v. Pittsburgh

188 Pa. Super. 371 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1958

The ■ credibility of expert witnesses and the weight to be attached to their testimony are matters exclusively for the board and in a conflict of medical opinion, it is for the board to decide which conclusion it will adopt … Visnic v. Westmoreland Coal Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 199 , 38 A. 2d 539 (1944) ; McCleary v. Pa. Electric Co., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 185 , 132 A. 2d 389 (1957) ; Cunningham v. Guerrina, 188 Pa.

Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.

212 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1968

. *24 The Board found as a fact that the claimant failed to sustain his burden as to the hazard and it is true that this finding of the Board is a pure question of fact. Witters v. Harrisburg Steel Corp., 183 Pa. … Brasacchio v. Pa. Highway Dept., supra, at page 218. The question then in this appeal is whether the Board capriciously disregarded competent evidence.

Weeks v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.

116 Pa. Super. 514 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1934

The material finding of the board read: “2. … findings of fact: Driscoll v.

Biehl v. General Accident Assurance Corp.

38 Pa. Super. 110 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1909

The question is not whether the assured was negligent, but whether he exposed himself to a risk not covered by the policy: Burkhard v. Travelers’ Insurance Company, 102 Pa. 262 ; DeLoy v. … Insurance Company, 171 Pa. 1 ; Rebman v. General Accident Insurance Company, 217 Pa. 518 ; Cornish v. Accident Insurance Company, L. R. 23 Q. B. Div. 453.

Commonwealth v. Murphy

92 Pa. Super. 139 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1927

Proof of that fact was relevant: Com. v. Brown, 264 Pa. 85, 91, 92 . See also Wigmore on Evidence Ed. of 1904, Vol. 2, Sec. 1071. It is undisputed that he understood what his accomplices charged against him. … Brown, 264 Pa. 85 ; Little Schuylkill Navigation Co. v. Richard’s Administrator, 57 Pa. 142 ; Com. v. R. R. Co., 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 235 ; 16 C. J., p. 1083; Thompson and Merriam on Juries, Section 383.

Wiles v. American Oil Co.

105 Pa. Super. 282 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1932

Superior Ct. 235 ; Morucci v. Susquehanna Col. Co., 297 Pa. 508, 513 . We said in Short v. Hughes Coal Co., 96 Pa. … The underlying facts found by the referee and the board do not permit that conclusion to be sustained. Whether the evidence brings the claim within the statutory definition of “premises” is a question of law: Johnson v.