Case law

Commonwealth v. Raybuck

2006 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2006

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Cornish, 403 Pa.Super. 492 , 589 A.2d 718, 721 (1991); Commonwealth v. Brown, 402 Pa.Super. 369 , 587 A.2d 6, 7 (1991).

Evans v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.

116 Pa. Super. 284 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1934

Payments made thereunder were by virtue of the award and not under the agreement: Putt v. Laher Ice Cream Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, 539 , 161 A. 622 . … There was ample evidence to support the finding made by the board. The precise question raised on this appeal was decided by this court in Roeschen v. Dietrich, 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 163 A. 63 , and Foster v.

Fox v. American News Co.

190 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

The board, on appeal, affirmed the referee, and the court below affirmed the board. … Rodgers v. Methodist Episcopal Hospital, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 , 145 A. 2d 893 ; Zilek v. C. C. Coal Company, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 628 , 142 A. 2d 507 ; Irvin v. Plymouth Meeting Rubber Division Linear, 182 Pa.

Shuda v. Shuda

283 Pa. Super. 253 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1980

Brown v. Brown, 254 Pa.Super. 410 , 386 A.2d 15 (1978). Some cases suggest that this means the parties are still married. E. g., Ponthus v. Ponthus, 70 Pa.Super. 39 (1918). … Brown v.

Sevast v. Kakouras

2003 Pa. Super. 508 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 26, 2003

See Brown v. Candelora, 708 A.2d 104 (Pa.Super.1998), appeal granted, 555 Pa. 478 , 725 A.2d 176 (1999) (conditional, unliquidated claim for breach of contract is not subject to attachment). … See Clardy v.

Com. v. Hill, S.

239 A.3d 175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2020

Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 985 A.2d 697, 706-07 (Pa. 2009); see generally Markham v. Wolf, 190 A.3d 1175, 1183 (Pa. 2018). … See Commonwealth v.

Gasior v. Pittsburgh

188 Pa. Super. 371 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1958

The ■ credibility of expert witnesses and the weight to be attached to their testimony are matters exclusively for the board and in a conflict of medical opinion, it is for the board to decide which conclusion it will adopt … Visnic v. Westmoreland Coal Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 199 , 38 A. 2d 539 (1944) ; McCleary v. Pa. Electric Co., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 185 , 132 A. 2d 389 (1957) ; Cunningham v. Guerrina, 188 Pa.

Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co.

152 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1943

The credibility of these medical witnesses and the weight to be attached to the testimony of each were for the consideration of the board, not the court below: Swalm v. J. E. Brokhoff, Inc., 145 Pa. … The findings of fact by the board were conclusive and the court below was without authority to change them: Hamer v. West Virginia Pulp and Paper Co., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 144, 150 , 18 A. 2d 452 ; Thomas v.

Mancuso v. Mancuso

150 Pa. Super. 22 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1942

Superior Ct. 581, 584, 585 , 176 A. 60 ; Corrento v. Ventresca et al., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 358, 363 , 19 A. 2d 746 . Although the board was not bound to accept the testimony of claimant and his physician (Bakaisa v. … Such testimony also supports the eleventh finding of fact of the board. See Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 22, 28, 29 , 15 A. 2d 559 . The conclusion of Judge Cunningham in Eckenroad v.

Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.

212 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1968

. *24 The Board found as a fact that the claimant failed to sustain his burden as to the hazard and it is true that this finding of the Board is a pure question of fact. Witters v. Harrisburg Steel Corp., 183 Pa. … Brasacchio v. Pa. Highway Dept., supra, at page 218. The question then in this appeal is whether the Board capriciously disregarded competent evidence.

Commonwealth v. Ruckinger

239 Pa. Super. 520 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1976

Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3148-3149 . … Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3151 .

Weeks v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.

116 Pa. Super. 514 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1934

The material finding of the board read: “2. … findings of fact: Driscoll v.

J.J. Pocock, Inc., to Use v. Levy

130 Pa. Super. 94 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1937

Co. v. Ansell et al., 125 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 , 189 A. 738 . … His findings are entitled to be given the same weight as those of a jury, and must stand if supported by evidence : Armstrong County v. Rearic, 315 Pa. 133, 135 , 172 A. 130 ; McKeague Mach. Co. v. O. & S. Mach.

Caviston v. Lang

152 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1943

returning the record to the board to enter the only judgment possible under its ruling: Apker v. … We said in Hornbake v. Hornbake, 72 Pa.

Bednar v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

194 Pa. Super. 10 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

Washko v. Ruckno., Inc., 180 Pa. Superior Ct. 606, 609 , 121 A. 2d 456 . … Boyle v. Boyle, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 188, 190 , 100 A. 2d 385 . See, also, Cairgle v.

Wiles v. American Oil Co.

105 Pa. Super. 282 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1932

Superior Ct. 235 ; Morucci v. Susquehanna Col. Co., 297 Pa. 508, 513 . We said in Short v. Hughes Coal Co., 96 Pa. … The underlying facts found by the referee and the board do not permit that conclusion to be sustained. Whether the evidence brings the claim within the statutory definition of “premises” is a question of law: Johnson v.

Hurlburt v. Fidelity Window Cleaning Co.

192 Pa. Super. 152 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1960

We must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party having the board’s decision: Curran v. Knipe & Sons, Inc., 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 540 , 138 A. 2d 251 . … Turek v. Damalak, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 84 , 53 A. 2d 748 ; Rupchak v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co., 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 228 , 54 A. 2d 309 ; Schaefer v. Central News Co., 179 Pa.

Coder v. Pittsburgh Desmoines Steel Co.

142 Pa. Super. 407 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1940

See Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co., 296 Pa. 503 , 146 A. 146 . The standards by which the competency of medical opinion evidence are to be measured have been fully discussed in Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co., 134 Pa. … In the light of what was said in Elonis v.

Mount Lebanon Township v. Hobbes

201 Pa. Super. 30 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

Hinaman v. … Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Water & Resources Board v. Green Spring Co., 394 Pa. 1 , 145 A. 2d 178 (1958); Tate Liquor License Case, 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 193 , 173 A. 2d 657 (1961).

Dalton v. Gray Line Motor Tours

95 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1928

The referee disallowed compensation and dismissed the petition; the board affirmed the referee; the court below reversed the board and directed it to allow the claimant such compensation as he may be entitled to receive under … See also Kunkel v. Kunkel, 267 Pa. 163 ; Lindsay v. Dutton, 227 Pa. 208 .