Case law

Napier v. County of Snyder

833 F. Supp. 2d 421 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2011

Plaintiff recommended to the Board of Assessment Appeals that the farmhouse be put back on the tax rolls. (Id. ¶ 101.) In Snyder County, the County Commissioners also serve as the Board of Assessment Appeals. … Snyder v. Baxter Healthcare, Inc., 393 Fed-Appx. 905, 909 (3d Cir.2010) (quoting Brenner v.

Shannon v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines

640 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1985

Barbachym v. Costa Line, Inc., 713 F.2d 216, 218 (6th Cir.1983); Strauss v. Norwegian Caribbean Lines, 613 F.Supp. 5, 7 (E.D.Pa. 1984). … They also admit that an agent on board the ship took documents from them, presumably the ticket. Id. at ft 6.

KEYSTONE CHAPTER, ASSOC. BUILDERS v. Foley

837 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1993

FMC Corp. v. Holliday, 498 U.S. 52 , 111 S.Ct. 403, 407 [ 112 L.Ed.2d 356 ] (1990). It is "virtually unique" among federal preemption statutes. Franchise Tax Bd. v. … Evans v. Safeco Life Ins. Co., 916 F.2d 1437, 1439 (9th Cir.1990). The term "relate to" must be given a "broad common-sense meaning." Pilot Life Ins. Co. v.

Olivetti v. Jewish Federation of Northeastern Pennsylvania

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2024

Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001). But, as other courts have noted,3 that case involved African-American plaintiffs. Id. at 793. … Brown, 250 F.3d at 797. She must “initially plead and ultimately prove that, but for race, [she] would not have suffered the loss of a legally protected right.” Comcast Corp. v. Nat’l Assoc.

Williams v. Clark

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 2021

of Inspectors; (3) an appeal of the Chairman's decision to the full Dauphin County Prison Board of Inspectors; and (4) an appeal from the Prison Board’s decision to the Dauphin County … Sawyers v. Brown, 2014 WL 407337, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 3, 2014). The burden of demonstrating exhaustion rests with plaintiffs. See Nyhuis v. Reno, 204 F.3d 65, 67 (3d Cir. 2000).

Cole v. Finsel

691 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1988

Super. 117, 120 , 442 A.2d 324 (1982); Coggins v. Carpenter, 468 F.Supp. 270 (E.D.Pa.1979). The Court in Brown v. … Brown v. Cooney, supra, 296 Pa.Super. pp. 120-121, 442 A.2d 324 (emphasis in original). Similarly, in Reiff v.

ESTATE OF STEPHEN PUZA v. Carbon County

586 F. Supp. 2d 271 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2007

See also, Bruzga v. … ; Tom Gerhard, a former Carbon County Commissioner and a former member of the Prison Board; Charles Getz, a Carbon County Commissioner and a member of the Prison Board; William F.

Columbia County Farmers National Bank of Orangeville v. Gregorowicz (In re Gregorowicz)

27 B.R. 193 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1982

The debtors also informed Reichert that they would like to explain to the board of directors of the Bank the circumstances surrounding the sale of the motorcycles. 7. … Truax & Hovey, Ltd. v. Grosso, (In Re Grosso), 9 B.R. 815, 821 (Bkrtcy.N.D.N.Y.1981).

United States v. Raff

161 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1958

See e. g.: Brown v. … Brown v.

Rogers v. Pennick

675 F. Supp. 982 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1987

See Wilmac Corp. v. Bowen, 811 F.2d 809 (3d Cir.1987); A.O. Smith Corp. v. FTC, 530 F.2d 515 (3d Cir.1976). … The sale and use of wine for sacramental or religious purposes shall be subject to and in accordance with the regulations of the board.

Little v. Dauphin County

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2025

Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … Judge Latella recommended the Court deny dismissal of this claim because Plaintiffs sufficiently allege that the Dauphin County Jail Oversite Board (the “Oversite Board”) had knowledge of and acquiescence to the relevant

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 764 v. Greenawalt

880 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1995

There was no mention of the cash transaction in the Executive Board minutes, nor was it ever approved by the Executive Board or the membership at large. … Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v.

Hohe v. Casey

727 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1989

They cite Hudson; Robinson v. New Jersey, 806 F.2d 442 (3d Cir.1986); Lowary v. Lexington Local Board of Education, 854 F.2d 131 (6th Cir.1988) and Gibney v. … Lowary v. Lexington Local Board of Education, 704 F.Supp. 1476, 1480-81 (N.D.Ohio 1988).

Mazur v. Department of Revenue, Com. of Pa.

516 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1981

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Swietlowich v. County of Bucks, 610 F.2d 1157 (3d Cir. 1979). In West v.

Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Resources v. United States Postal Service

810 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1992

Burr; Loeffler, supra, 486 U.S. at 554-55 , 108 S.Ct. at 1969 and Franchise Tax Board v. USPS, 467 U.S. 512, 517-18 , 104 S.Ct. 2549, 2552-53 , 81 L.Ed.2d 446 (1984). … Accord: Franchise Tax Board, supra, 467 U.S. at 519-20 , 104 S.Ct. at 2553-54 .

Universal Computer Systems, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

479 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1979

An air carrier is required by 49 U.S.C. § 1373 (a) to file its tariff with the Civil Aeronautics Board. … See, Stevenson v. Economy Bank of Ambridge, 413 Pa. 442 , 197 A.2d 721 (1964); Welded Tube Co. of America v. Phoenix Steel Corp., 512 F.2d 342 (3d Cir. 1975); Cenna v.

Dorrance v. Phillips

9 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1934

Brown, it was denied that there was any sort of an agreement between the Temple Coal Company and its subsidiaries. … Wourdack v. Backer, Collector of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 840 ; Clift & Goodrich, Inc., v. United States (C. O. A.) 56 F.(2d) 751 .

Borough of Olyphant v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

269 F. Supp. 2d 601 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2003

Such regulatory powers, as Sun Buick noted with regard to the Pennsylvania Board of Vehicles, are those of an administrative agency, not a court. Sun Buick, 26 F.3d at 1264-65 . … Sun Buick, 26 F.3d at 1265 (citing Proffitt v. Comm’rs, Township of Bristol, 754 F.2d 504 , 506-07 (3d Cir.1985) abrogated on other grounds by Hallstrom v.

In re Poore

139 F. 862 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1905

Brown, 193 Pa. 351 , 44 Atl. 459 , in each of which the writing was held to constitute, not a bailment, but a conditional sale. … The latter provision, however, is of no effect (Thompson v. Paret, 94 Pa. 275 ; Brunswick v. Hoover, 95 Pa. 508 , 40 Am. Rep. 674 ; Peek v. Heim, 127 Pa. 500 , 17 Atl. 984 , 14 Am. St.

Morgan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2024

Louis v. Prapotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 117 (1978). 116 City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 388, 392 (1989). 117 Estate of Roman v. City of Newark, 914 F.3d 789, 798 (2019) (quoting Brown v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997). 119 Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011). pleading that no such pattern is alleged, and Morgan does not argue otherwise.