Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

0.81s

  • Allen v. Lackawanna County Board of Commissioners

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2019

    (JUDGE MARIANI) LACKAWANNA COUNTY BOARD OF : (Magistrate Judge Mehalchick) COMMISSIONERS, et al., : Defendants. … Local Rule 72.3; Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 201 1).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kress v. Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2025

    On April 20, 2023, Plaintiff requested a hearing before the Zoning Board to object to the Ordinance but the Zoning Board, Mundie, Maue, and Hillard denied this request. … Mar. 30, 2018) (finding school board members were personally involved where plaintiff alleged they voted unanimously at a school board meeting).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Harshman v. Superintendent

    368 F. Supp. 3d 776 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2019

    Brown v. Wenerowicz , 663 F.3d 619 , 629 (3d Cir. 2011). … See Giglio v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Global Tower, LLC v. Hamilton Township

    897 F. Supp. 2d 237 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 2012

    As such, I agree with Magistrate Judge Methvin’s reasoning that the Board misapplied this section. v. … Under Pennsylvania law, a court will reverse the decision of a zoning board when the board has committed an abuse of discretion or an error of law. Hertzberg v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Halchak v. Dorrance Township Board of Supervisors

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2019

    Local Rule 72.3; Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … Board of Regents, 790 F.2d 707, 711- 12 (8th Cir. 1986). Alvin v. Suzuki, 227 F.3d 107, 116 (3d Cir. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bell v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2019

    Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. 766, 773 (2010). … See O’Sullivan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Simpson v. PA Board of Probation & Parole

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2019

    Dipietro v. Jefferson Bank, 144 F.R.D. 279, 281 (E.D. Pa. 1992). … See Hammie v. Castor, No. CIV. A. 93-5304, 1995 WL 61126, at *3 (E.D. Pa.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Futch v. Stone

    782 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1992

    See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c); Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Mainelli v. Haberstroh

    237 F. Supp. 190 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1964

    Mitchell v. Evelyn C. Brown, Inc., 310 F.2d 420 (1st Cir. 1962); Hanson v. Reiss Steamship Company, 184 F.Supp. 545 (D.C.Del.1960); Petition of Gulf Oil Corporation, 172 F.Supp. 911 (S.D.N.Y.1959). … In Caldwell v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Young v. Kisenwether

    902 F. Supp. 2d 548 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2012

    Brown v. Hartlage, 456 U.S. 45, 53 , 102 S.Ct. 1523 , 71 L.Ed.2d 732 (1982). … Brown v. Montgomery Cnty., 470 Fed.Appx. 87 (3d Cir.2012) (citing Hill v. Borough of Kutztown, 455 F.3d 225, 236 (3d Cir.2006)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. Hirsch

    460 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 1978

    Brown v. Collective Bargaining in Higher Education, 67 Mich.L.Rev. 1067, 1175 (1969), quoted also in Catholic Bishop of Chicago at 1123. 90 . Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 559 F.2d at 1123. 91 . Caulfield at 29. 92 . … In both 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3), the determination of whether a violation has occurred depends upon the employer’s motive, NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); NLRB v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International Union, Local 6 v. National Labor Relations Board, 799 F. Supp. 507 (1992)Cited 25 timesPublished
  • June v. Secretary of the Navy

    557 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1982

    Although some courts have stated that “the cause of action does not accrue until the appropriate discharge review board” renders a decision on the serviceman’s claim, see, e.g., Walters v. … Brown, 449 F.Supp. 207, 210 (N.D.Cal.1978), it has long been the law within this Circuit that servicemen are not required to look to the DRB or the BCNR before filing suit to overturn a discharge from the military.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gere Ex Rel. Gere v. Stanley

    320 F. Supp. 852 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1970

    However, as Judge Wyzanski noted in Richards v. … Brown, 299 F.Supp. 1360 (N.D.Ala. 1967), but represented a consensus of the thinking of Administrators, Faculty, Student Council, and the School Board, which certainly merits consideration on the question of reasonableness

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Damiano v. Scranton School District

    135 F. Supp. 3d 255 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2015

    See Bd. of the County Comm’rs. of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. *267 Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citing Monell v. New York City Dep’t of Soc. … Bd. of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Yeager v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2024

    Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979); see also Burkett v. … Block v. Potter, 631 F.2d 233, 236 (3d Cir. 1980). Stated simply, the court must evaluate whether the Board abused its discretion.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Horsey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Parole Board

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2024

    V. 15 Roman v. DiGuglielmo, 675 F.3d 204, 210 (3d Cir. 2012) (citing Minnesota v. … United States v. Manuel, 732 F.3d 283, 291 (3d Cir. 2013) (“A parole revocation hearing is not a criminal prosecution.”); see Richardson v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 236 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Horsey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Parole Board

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2024

    FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONNELLE HORSEY, No. 4:24-CV-00825 Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann) v. … substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this Court’s procedural rulings are correct, Slack v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vasquez v. Dauphin County Board of Prison Inspectors

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2024

    : : DAUPHIN COUNTY BOARD OF : PRISON INSPECTORS … See, e.g., Tillio v. Mendelsohn, 256 F. App'x 509 (3d Cir. 2007) (failure to timely serve pleadings compels dismissal); Azubuko v. Bell National Organization, 243 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United Office & Professional Workers of America v. Smiley

    77 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1948

    Workers v. International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers et al., 2 Cir., 1940, 115 F.2d 488 , at page 490; Parker v. Brown, 1943, 317 U.S. 341, 349 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 . … Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co. v. Sherman, D.C. S.D.N.Y., 1924, 2 F.2d 165 / 18 Sweeney et al. v. State Board of Public Assistance, D.C.M.D.Pa., 36 F.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital

    272 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 2003

    See United States v. Brown Univ., 5 F.3d 658 , 668-69 (3d Cir.1993). … See Brown Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.