Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

1.52s

  • Peter D. Goines Jr. v. Warden Adam Ogle, et al.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2026

    Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 532 (2002). It has been made clear that the exhaustion requirement is mandatory. See Williams v. Beard, 482 F.3d 637, 639 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Booth v. … See Rinaldi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Orr v. Collin

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2020

    See, e.g., Jutrowski v. … Co., Ltd. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mitchell v. Marsh

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2021

    See Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155 (3d Cir. 1982); Zicarelli v. Gray, 543 F.2d 466 (3d Cir. 1976). Both the legal theory and the facts on which a federal claim rests must have been presented to the state courts. … See Picard, 404 U.S. at 277; Brown, 669 F.2d at 158-61.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DOE v. McCarthy

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2021

    Brown v. Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009) (citing Batoff v. State Farm Ins. Co., 977 F.2d 848, 851 (3d Cir. 1992)). See also, Sikirica v. Nationwide Ins. … Morgan v. Gay, 471 F.3d 469, 474 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing St. Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 294 (1938)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Murphy, Jr. v. Smith

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2021

    See Holland, 560 U.S. at 649 (quoting Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005)); see also Jenkins v. … See Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 773 (3d Cir. 2003) (quoting Valverde v. Stinson, 224 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir. 2000)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fought v. City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024

    v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997)). Here, Fought does not allege a pattern of constitutional violations by City Defendants. (Doc. 36, ¶¶ 178-95). … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2001); see also Dotter 2016 WL 336870, at *9; Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Starks v. Northern York County Regional Police Department

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2025

    United States v. Brown, 631 F.3d 638, 648 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting United States v. Dale, 991 F.2d 819, 844 (D.C. Cir. 1993)). … Dobson v. Milton Hershey Sch., 356 F. Supp. 3d 428, 439 (M.D. Pa. 2018) (citing Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 217–18 (3rd Cir. 2001)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jacobs v. Zaken

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2024

    v. … See Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Folk v. Bureau of Prisons

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2021

    .”); Ryle v. Fuh, 820 F. … See, e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gorbey v. Carney

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 2021

    Butz v. … See Brown v. City of Philadelphia, 331 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ernst v. Union County Conservation District

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2024

    Diaz v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McRae v. Ebbert

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 2019

    Torres v. Fauver, 292 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2002). … Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445-46 (1985): see also Griffin v. Spratt, 969 F.2d 16, 19 (3d Cir. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Durko v. Oi-Neg TV Products, Inc.

    870 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1994

    Plaintiff was thereafter assigned to a temporary position as Assistant Furnace Operator on the rotating “B Shift.” 3 In July of 1992, plaintiff filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), naming as respondents … In Goodman v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tucker Industrial Liquid Coatings, Inc. v. Borough of East Berlin

    85 F. Supp. 3d 803 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 2015

    Enforcement Notice.” 6 The *807 mailing regarding the 407 North Avenue property advised that industrial uses are not permitted in the mixed use zoning district without special exception approval by the East Berlin Zoning Hearing Board … See Reedy v. Evanson, 615 F.3d 197, 210 (3d Cir.2010) (citing Peterson v. Lehigh Valley List. Council, 676 F.2d 81 , 84 (3d Cir.1982)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ortiz v. Keystone Premier Settlement Services LLC

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2025

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009). … Seplow, 2024 WL 649260, at *4 (citing Villanueva v. Brown, 103 F.3d 1128, 1137 (3d Cir. 1997)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hernandez

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2025

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 529 (2004); see also Zadvydas v. … grant Hernandez bond, the Government could seek an emergency stay of the bond order pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(i)(1) if it can “demonstrate that it was likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal to the [Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ojo v. Brew Vino LLC

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2021

    DISCUSSION “A court may set aside entry of default for good cause,” World Entm't Inc. v. Brown, 487 Fed.Appx. 758, 761 (3d Cir. 2012) (citing Fed. R. Civ. … Co. v. Papa, Civ. No. 11-CV-2798, 2012 WL 868944, *2 (D.N.J. Mar. 14, 2012) (citing Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Co., Ltd., 691 F.2d 653, 656 (3d Cir. 1982)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BGN Development Corporation v. Moosic Borough

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2024

    filed this lawsuit on September 7, 2023, against Defendants Moosic Borough (“the Borough”), Moosic Borough Council (“the Council”), Moosic Borough Planning Commission (“the Commission”), Moosic Borough Zoning Board … of Adjustments (“the Board”) (collectively, “Moosic Defendants”), Vesper Northeast LP (“Vesper Northeast”), Vesper Management, Vesper Management, LLC, Vesper Property Group, Ltd., (collectively, “Vesper Defendants

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shook of West Virginia, Inc. v. York City Sewer Authority

    756 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1991

    Compare Board of Educ. v. … See Glover v. St.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Millbrook v. United States

    8 F. Supp. 3d 601 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2014

    In Cuoco v. … Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81 , 126 S.Ct. 2378 , 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006). “There is no futility exception to the exhaustion requirement.” Brown v. Croak, 312 F.3d 109, 112 (3d Cir.2002) (citing Nyhuis, 204 F.3d at 75 ).

    Cited 57 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.