Case law

Robinson v. Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass'n

299 F. Supp. 2d 425 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2004

Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977), and Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292 , 106 S.Ct. 1066 , 89 L.Ed.2d 232 (1986). … The union in Otto v.

Moeller v. Bradford County

444 F. Supp. 2d 316 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2006

The Department of Labor awarded the funds to the Team Pennsylvania Workforce Initiative Board, which manages the funds in Pennsylvania. … It applies to state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.” citing Board of Educ. v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687, 690 , 114 S.Ct. 2481 , 129 L.Ed.2d 546 (1994).

Greenway Logistics v. White

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2020

See Sherman v. John Brown Ins. Agency Inc., 38 F. Supp. 3d 658, 662–63 (W.D. Pa. 2014). … Network, 748 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2014) (citing Ashcroft v.

Tufano

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2026

Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … See Wassel v. Pike Cnty., No. 3:22CV145, 2025 WL 1710245, at *4 (M.D. Pa.

Carbonite Filter Corp. v. C. Overaa & Co.

353 F. Supp. 3d 332 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2018

. ; Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011), and Daimler AG v.

Hoffman v. Stevens

177 F. Supp. 898 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1959

And see Martin v. … Boom Co. v. Patterson, 1878, 98 U.S. 403, 406 , 25 L.Ed. 206 . The particular manner or source of payment is not plaintiffs' concern. Spann v. Joint Boards of School Directors, 1955, 381 Pa. 338, 350 , 113 A.2d 281 .

Lopez v. Berryhill

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2020

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Junlous v. Ferguson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 2020

The deceased Adreanne Evans, her new romantic interest Sterling Brown, Adreanne’s mother Sage Evans, as well as [Petitioner] and Adreanne’s infant child sleeping in there. … See Dunn v. Colleran, 247 F.3d 450, 468 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting Calderon v. Coleman, 525 U.S. 414, 146 (1998)).

Sweeney

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 2026

See Kach v. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)).

Disen v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2024

Local Rule 72.3; Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). The de novo standard applies only to objections which are both timely and specific. Goney v. Clark, 749 F.2d 5, 6-7 (3d Cir. 1984). … See Bailey v. Harleysville Nat'l Bank & Tr., 188 F.

Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. Bartlett

315 F. Supp. 238 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1970

Urbano v. Board of Managers, 415 F.2d 247 (3d Cir.1969); Harris v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 410 F.2d 1332 (3d Cir.1969); S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 268 F.Supp. 568 (D.N.J.1967). … V.

Cummings v. Weller

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 2023

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D. Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Velardo v. Lewko

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 2019

Local Rule 72.3; Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011). … Mariotti v. Mariotti Bldg. Prod., Inc., 714 F.3d 761, 764-65 (3d Cir. 2013) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 558 (2007).

Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2022

file a written request with the General Counsel of the Board. … See, e.g., Wultz v. Bank of China LTD., 61 F.

Smith v. Anchor Motor Freight Co.

428 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 7, 1976

At the outset, it should be noted that both parties agree that leave to amend may be denied on the ground of legal insufficiency, see Philadelphia Housing Authority v. … The most compelling reason for such a conclusion is that the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held, in Richardson v.

Sinkler v. Clark

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2021

“If the Chairman affirms the denial of a grievance, the inmate may appeal to the full Prison Board (Third Level).” (Id. ¶ 7.) … See Nyhuis v. Reno, 204 F.3d 65, 75-76 (3d Cir. 2000). Courts have typically required across-the-board exhaustion by inmates seeking to pursue claims in federal court. See id.

Rosenkrans v. Wetzel

131 F. Supp. 2d 609 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2001

See also, Lupo v. … (See Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 4 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2843 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983)).

Pomicter v. Luzerne Cnty. Convention Ctr. Auth.

322 F. Supp. 3d 558 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2018

See, e.g., Brown v. … In Hill v.

Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2025

United States v. Georgia, 546 U.S. 151, 159 (2006); see also Durham v. … See Marten v. Hunt, 479 Fed.Appx. 436 (3d Cir. 2012); Lewis v. Wetzel, 153 F.Supp.3d 678 (M.D. Pa. 2015); see also Harris v. Ferguson, 3:16-cv-1965, 2017 WL 3611752, at *4-5 (M.D. Pa.

United States v. Serafini

7 F. Supp. 2d 529 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1998

United States v. … Brown worked this scheme with numerous individuals, none of which had any knowledge of the others. Id. at 754 .