Case law

Ashmen v. Big Boulder Corp.

322 F. Supp. 3d 593 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 8, 2018

Chamberlain v. Giampapa , 210 F.3d 154 , 158 (3d Cir. 2000) (citing Erie R.R. v. Tompkins , 304 U.S. 64 , 78, 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938) ). … (holding that a skier was barred from recovery where the injury occurred when he attempted to board the ski lift when the bottom of the chair was not folded down for seating); Crews v.

Ambrogi v. Gould, Inc.

750 F. Supp. 1233 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1991

Texas) (Brown, Magistrate), 1986 WL *1240 13130 (S.D.Texas), 25 E.R.C. 2009; Coburn v. Sun Chemical Corp., Civ. No. 88-0120, slip op. (E.D.Pa. … The Defendants dispute that such costs are recoverable under CERCLA and have relied on the case of Chaplin v. Exxon Corp., 25 E.R.C. (BNA) 2009 (S.D.Texas 1986) (Brown, Magistrate) and its progeny, Coburn v.

Martin v. North Penn Savings & Loan (In Re Martin)

253 B.R. 346 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2000

Waldorf v. Shuta, 142 F.3d 601, 616 (3d Cir.1998)(quoting Kohn v. American Metal Climax Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 307 (3d Cir.1972), partially overruled on other grounds en banc by Kershner v. … See In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 569-570 (3d Cir.1991) (state court summary judgment decision in mortgage foreclosure action “final” for pur *352 poses of applying issue preclusion in Bankruptcy Court proceeding); Shaffer v

City of Williamsport v. United States

273 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1967

State of New Jersey v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 324 (D.C.1958), affirmed Bergen County v. United States, 359 U.S. 27 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 625 (1959); Sludden v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 150 (M.D.Pa. 1962). … See Florida East Coast Railway Company v.

Donahue v. Brittain

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2025

Several months later, Donahue filed a second Section 2254 petition in this Court.3 In his second petition, Donahue attempts to challenge the Pennsylvania Parole Board’s June 24, 2024 decision to deny him parole.4 Because … Id. at 820 (quoting and agreeing with Crone v. Cockrell, 324 F.3d 833, 837 (5th Cir. 2003)). 15 See Donahue v. Brittain, No. 4:24-cv-01119, Doc. 5 (M.D. Pa.

Yearsley v. Scranton Housing Authority

487 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1979

Thorpe v. … Cal.1973); Comprehensive Group Health Services Board of Directors v. Temple University, 363 F.Supp. 1069, 1092-93 (E.D.Pa. 1973). See also Norwalk Core v.

Fiddemon v. Maholik

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2023

Williams v. City of York, Pennsylvania, 967 F.3d 252, 259 (3d Cir. 2020) (citing Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 277 (3d Cir. 1990)). … Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Rahman v. Gartley

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2024

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Bird v. Borough of Moosic

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2021

pension board for further proceedings); Isajewicz v. Bucks Cty. Dept of Commcins, 851 F. Supp. 161, 166 (E.D. … at 142, and dismissing due process claims as unripe where underlying claims remained under review by municipal pension board).?

Wallace v. United States of America

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2023

Rambo) v. … v.

Jones v. Hufford

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2019

See Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Litterio v. … New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) claim that is barred by the procedural limitations imposed by the AEDPA); Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726-27 (M.D. Pa. 2001).

Johnson v. Bradley

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2019

See Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Litterio v. … New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) claim that is barred by the procedural limitations imposed by the AEDPA); Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726-27 (M.D. Pa. 2001).

David H. v. Palmyra Area School District

769 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 1990

Because it appeared that the Supreme Court’s decision in Dellmuth v. … Co. v. Zenith Radio, 475 U.S. 574 , [586-88] 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). Hankins v. Temple University, 829 F.2d 437, 440 (3d Cir.1987).

Seyler v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2022

Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D. Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)). … Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (2010) (citing Henderson v.

Cooper v. SCI-Muncy

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 2024

Claims Against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole The Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state and its agencies in federal court. See Pennhurst State Sch. And Hosp. v. … And the Eleventh Amendment affords the Pennsylvania Board, a state agency, protection from suit in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Harper v.

Wenkosky v. Protective Insurance

698 F. Supp. 1227 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1988

See Ayres v. … Brown, Inc., 56 Misc.2d 577 , 289 N.Y.S.2d 722 (1968) (no ambiguity in Truckmen’s endorsement virtually identical to the exclusionary language here at issue).

Hess v. Township of Saint Thomas

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2024

The above-named individual defendants are alleged to be members of the Authority board of directors.* (Id. J] 4-17). … Hills v. Borough of Colwyn, 978 F. Supp. 2d 469, 479 (E.D. Pa. | 2013)(citing Schafer v. Board of Public Educ., 903 F.2d 243, 251 (3d Cir.1990)(referring to this as the “named respondent rule”).

Boone v. Pennsylvania Office of Vocational Rehabilitation

373 F. Supp. 2d 484 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2005

Board of Regents of University System of Georgia, 535 U.S. 613 , 122 S.Ct. 1640 , 152 L.Ed.2d 806 (2002). … Essentially, Plaintiffs § 1983 claims are based on the “stigma-plus” or “reputation-plus” cases that originated in the Supreme Court’s decision in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Clouser v. Harrisburg National Bank & Trust Co.

219 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1963

Each branch had its own Advisory Board by whom the loans were approved. Each branch also had its own manager. Some loans were secured, some unsecured. Prior to August 1960, Horner conferred with Samuel M. … Herget v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 324 U.S. 4 , 65 S.Ct. 505 , 89 L.Ed. 656 (1945).

Bethea v. Wetzel

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2020

Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); see also Learner v. … See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2005). It also applies to parole board decisions. See Williams v. Consovoy, 453 F.3d 173, 177 (3d Cir. 2006).