Case law

Klinger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

895 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 1995

Dercoli v. … See, e.g., Gordon v. Pennsylvania Blue Shield, 378 Pa.Super. 256, 263 , 548 A2d 600, 602 (1988); Horowitz v. Federal Kemper Life Assur. Co., 57 F.3d 300 , 307 (3d Cir.1995); MacFarland v. U.S.

Brizuela v. Saghrue

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2022

Brizuela v. Federation of State Medical Boards, 1:22-cv-1249-WIA; 2. Brizuela v. Sarah Wagner, 1:22-cv-1250-WIA; 3. Brizuela v. … In case 1:22-cv-1249-WIA, he alleges that The Federation of State Medical Boards, based in Texas, violated of his constitutional rights.

Morrison v. Stepanski

839 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1993

California v. … See, e.g., Webb v. Keohane, 804 F.2d 413, 414-15 (7th Cir.1986); Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902, 907 (9th Cir.1983); People v. McClendon, 224 Cal.App.3d 1208 , 274 Cal.Rptr. 502 , 506 (1990); and Drescher v.

Martinez

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2026

There is a final order of removal providing that Martinez, a citizen of El Salvador, be removed to that country, a decision which Martinez has appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … Gabriel Buele Morocho v. Warden, Philadelphia FDC, et al, Civ. No. 26-1150, --- F.4th ----, 2026 WL 2546223 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2026).

Cummings v. Weller

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2022

v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D. Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

County of Fulton, at. al. v. Dominion Voting Systems, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2023

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, (2007)). … See Davis v.

Gibson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2025

Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … See Wassel v. Pike Cnty., No. 3:22CV145, 2025 WL 1710245, at *4 (M.D. Pa.

Brennerman v. Thompson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2021

Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56 (1985) (“[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board”). … Hill, 472 U.S. at 457; Elkin v. Fauver, 969 F.2d 48 (3d Cir. 1992); Thompson v. Owens, 889 F.2d 500 (3d Cir. 1989); Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584, 588 (2d Cir. 1988); Freeman v.

Brennerman v. Thompson

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2021

Inst. v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 454-56 (1985) (“[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board”). … Hill, 472 U.S. at 457; Elkin v. Fauver, 969 F.2d 48 (3d Cir. 1992); Thompson v. Owens, 889 F.2d 500 (3d Cir. 1989); Franco v. Kelly, 854 F.2d 584, 588 (2d Cir. 1988); Freeman v.

Paneto v. CWork Solutions, LP

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2020

Bame and Brown met with Ms. Paneto and issued her a written discipline for the August 26, 2016 incidents. (Doc. 21, ¶ 22.) Ms. Brown and Ms. Bame testified that Ms. … Brown that it was because she was experiencing hemi-facial spasms. (Doc. 34, ¶ 23.) Four days earlier, Ms.

Oxenrider v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2021

v. White Consol. Indus., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993)). 9 Connelly v. Lane Const. … Jeffries, 808 F.2d 281, 284 n.4 (3d Cir. 1986) (noting that any Section 1983 action by prisoner against Pennsylvania Parole Board is barred by eleventh amendment); Laskaris v.

Atiyeh v. Borough of Gettysburg

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2024

Atiyeh then also appealed to the Borough’s Historic Architectural Review Board (the “HARB”), an advisory board to the Gettysburg Borough Council (“the Council”). (Doc. 58, at 8). Ms. … claim challenging the action of a multi-member decision-making board).

Burke v. TransAm Trucking, Inc.

617 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2009

v. … Smelser v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 105 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir.1997); Combs v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 256 Va. 490 at 497 , 507 S.E.2d 355, 359 (1998); Yarchak v.

Ismail v. McDermott International Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 2022

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … See Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 181-82 (3d Cir. 2009).

In re Bloss Glass Co.

39 B.R. 694 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1984

In order to resolve this matter, we are compelled to follow the holdings of the Supreme Court of the United States in the recent decision of National Labor Relations Board v.

Bell v. Lackawanna County

892 F. Supp. 2d 647 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2012

Kaucher v. … (citing Brown v. Trench, 787 F.2d 167, 169 (3d Cir.1986)). The court must review and consider the intended “functions of the office in question and not the actual past duties of the particular employee involved.”

Religious Rights Foundation of PA v. State College Area School District

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2023

.11 The Board has statutory authority to set various eligibility rules for its extracurricular programs.12   6 Connelly v. … Trefelner v.

Kilian v. Stackpole Sons, Inc.

98 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1951

Rosenzweig v. … Brown, 43 Pa. 9 at page 16. The Callan v. Gaylord case has never been cited as authority on the proposition. See cases cited in argument of counsel in- that case at p. 323.

Pieczynski v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2023

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Brown v … v. Murphree, 326 U.S. 438, 444–445 (1946)).

Bonham v. Boberesky

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2019

That motion was unanimously approved by the Board. (See id. at ¶ 42). … Kaucher v.