Case law

Leaphart v. Campbell

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2023

An across-the- board exhaustion requirement also promotes judicial efficiency. . . . … Davis, 49 F.App’x at 268; see also Brown v.

In re Mallow Hotel Corp.

17 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1937

Park v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co. (C.C.) 57 F. 799, 803 ; Clyde et al. v. Richmond & D. R. Co. et al. (C.C.) 63 F. 21, 24 ; Dayton Hydraulic Co. v. Felsenthall (C.C.A.) 116 F. 961 ; Menke v. … This statement was adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Wilkes-Barre Hotel Company. Since the petition before the court to strike the rent' claim from the record is signed.

Brabham v. Houser

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2022

V. … See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). An appropriate Order follows.

Wilkes Barre Lace Mfg. Co. v. Mundy

18 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1937

In the case of Cary v. … Cary v. Curtis, 'supra; Curtis’ Administratrix v. Fiedler, supra.

Jackson v. USP-Allenwood

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2020

See Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726 (M.D. Pa. 2001); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e); Litterio v. … New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), claim that is barred by the procedural limitations imposed by the AEDPA); Brown v. Mendez, 167 F. Supp. 2d 723, 726-27 (M.D. Pa. 2001).

Gettysburg Battlefield Preservation Ass'n v. Gettysburg College

799 F. Supp. 1571 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1992

Inc. v. Brown, 948 F.2d 1436 (5th Cir.1991), the Fifth Circuit reversed the trial court’s order dismissing the action, and remanded for fact-finding. … See Riehl v.

Cooper v. Nicholas

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 2024

— Claims Against the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole The Eleventh Amendment bars suits against a state and its agencies in federal court. See Pennhurst State Sch. And Hosp. v. … And the Eleventh Amendment affords the Pennsylvania Board, a state agency, protection from suit in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Harper v.

Winton v. Adams

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2022

BROWN, C.O. DUNLAP, : _ FEB C.O. RISSLE, . . … P. 15(a)(2), and since, as a matter of law, an amended complaint takes the place of any prior complaint, effectively invalidating the prior complaint, see Palakovic v.

Muldoon

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 2026

The Board has the authority to appoint a person or committee to administer the Plans. (Doc. 1, ¶¶ 36-39). The Board tasked the Committee with administering the Plans. (Doc. 1, ¶¶ 39-42). … See Mator v.

Lapp v. Cohen

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 2023

v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F. Supp. 2d 496, 499 (M.D. Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Snyder v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2022

When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F.Supp.2d 496, 499 (M.D.Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

Codorun Farms, Inc. v. West Manchester Township

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … See Chainey v.

United States Ex Rel. Senk v. Brierley

381 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1974

Gockley v. … This, then is not a case where the suspect was: subjected to physical brutality and mental terror, Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.

Ryan v. Berwick Industries, Inc.

30 F. Supp. 2d 834 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1998

Accordingly, based on the court’s opinion in Wertz v. … We find Long v. Board of Educ. Of the City of Philadelphia, 812 F.Supp. 525, 534 (E.D.Pa., 1993) (citing Raleigh v.

Houston v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2025

See Moscato v. Fed. … Brown v. Warden Canaan USP, 763 F. App’x 296, 297 (3d Cir. 2019) (unpublished) (quoting Lyons v. U.S. Marshals, 840 F.2d 202, 205 (3d Cir. 1988)).

Goff v. Cummins, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2023

Co. v. Evans, 166 F.3d 139, 148 (3d Cir. 1999); Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1485 (3d Cir. 1990))); see, e.g., Brown-Baumbach v. B&B Auto., Inc., 437 F. … See Brown-Baumbach, 437 F. App’x at 134 (citing Durham, 166 F.3d at 148). IV.

United States v. Collins

395 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1975

Id.; United States v. … United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1973); United States v. Brown, 501 F.2d 146 (9th Cir. 1974). Therefore, considering all the circumstances of this case, I conclude that the probative value of Dr.

United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

220 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 1963

Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556 , 3 S.Ct. 396 , 27 L.Ed. 1030 (1883); Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bilder, 3 Cir., 289 F.2d 291, 303 (1961); Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … In Rodgers v.

Ward, Jr. v. Warden of SCI-Houtzdale

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2021

Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 773 (3d Cir. 2003) (quoting Valverde v. Stinson, 224 F.3d 129, 134 (2d Cir. 2000)). … Ross v. Varano, 712 F.3d 784, 799-800 (3d Cir. 2013) (citing Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 774 (3d Cir. 2003)).

Deonna v. Centre Hills Country Club

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2022

(citing Ryan v. Carter, 93 U.S. 78 (1876); United States v. … (citing Hoy v.