Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,649 results
2.13s
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2021
Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2242). “The writ, or order to show cause shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. … Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Ky., 410 U.S. 484, 494–95 (1973). “The whole force of the writ is spent upon the respondent.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 2020
Brown SHALL OBTAIN new counsel within 30 days; 4. Mr. Brown SHALL COOPERATE with Defense Counsel with respect to re-scheduling his deposition. … See, e.g., Emerson v. Thiel College, supra; Tillio v. Mendelsohn, 256 F. App’x 509 (3d Cir. 2007); Reshard v. Lankenau Hospital, 256 F. App’x 506 (3d Cir. 2007); Azubuko v. Bell National Organization, 243 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMacMurray v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
428 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1977
In Heyn v. Board of Supervisors of La. … See Wilson v. Sharon Steel Corporation, 399 F.Supp. 403, 408 (W.D.Pa.1975); Lombard v. Board of Education of City of New York, 407 F.Supp. 1166, 1172 (E.D.N.Y.1976).
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 2021
See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. … See also Magic Toyota, Inc. v. Southeast Toyota Distribs., Inc., 784 F. Supp. 306, 321 (D.S.C.1992); Sadighi v. Daghighfekr, 36 F. Supp. 2d 267, 278 (D.S.C. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 2020
When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D.Pa. 2010) (citing Henderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDennis v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF FOOD EMP. LABOR
620 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1985
See, e.g., Hollinger v. Wagner Mining Equipment Co., 667 F.2d 402, 405 (3d Cir.1981). … See Edwards v. Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. Pension Trust, 757 F.2d 52 (3d Cir.1985); Struble v. New Jersey Brewery Employees’ Welfare Trust Fund, 732 F.2d 325 (3d Cir.1984).
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2019
Brown to file an amended complaint. Brown v. Camp Hill, No. 3:CV-10-2612, 2015 WL 5675575 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 25, 2015). On October 9, 2015, Mr. Brown filed an Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 66.) … Brown had plead a viable retaliation claim. Brown v. Camp Hill, No. 3:CV-10-2612, 2016 WL 5461986 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 29, 2016).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAdams v. School Board of Wyoming Valley West School District
53 F.R.D. 267 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1971
In Monroe v. … The right alleged is as plainly federal in origin and nature as those vindicated in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. *270 483 [ 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ].
Cited 17 timesPublishedKitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
400 F. Supp. 2d 707 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2005
In Edwards v. … Also, in ACLU v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedKinnison v. U. S. Board of Parole
407 F. Supp. 367 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1975
Washington v. Hagen, 287 F.2d 332 (3d Cir. 1960). In Hyser v. … Kinnison’s reliance on Pickus, v. U. S. Board of Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C.Cir. 1974) is misplaced.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2024
Defendants maintain that their identification of Plaintiffs as African American females does not show racial prejudice, citing Brown v. … See United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 250 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Nelson, 284 F.3d 472, 481 (3d Cir. 2002)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBarley v. Luzerne County Board of Elections
937 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1995
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62, 69 , 110 S.Ct. 2729, 2734 , 111 L.Ed.2d 52, 63 (1990); Kusper v. … Good v. Dauphin County Social Services, 891 F.2d 1087 (3d Cir.1989); Wade v. City of Pittsburgh, 765 F.2d 405 (3d Cir.1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarna v. Board of School Directors of the Panther Valley School District
143 F. Supp. 3d 205 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2015
Thus, in Brown v. … Brown, 2006 WL 385085 , at *3.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational Dental Council v. Pennsylvania, State Board of Dentistry
677 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1987
In Gavett v. … See Bergstrom v. Bergstrom, 623 F.2d 517 (8th Cir.1980). In Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedInsurance Board under the Social Insurance Plan v. Muir
628 F. Supp. 1537 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1986
In Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. … Plaintiffs have cited Children’s Hospital v. Whitcomb, 778 F.2d 239 (5th Cir.1985) and Kilmer v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2022
No. 1); see Reid v. Kepple, No. 1:22-cv- 00165 (M.D. Pa. filed Feb. 2, 2022), ECF No. 1. At the parties’ request, the Court consolidated Reid’s action into this one, following which the Browns (Doc. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2023
Nos. 71–72) move to dismiss the amended complaints filed, respectively, by Plaintiffs Quashae Brown and Quanyae Brown (the “Browns”) (Doc. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA QUASHAE BROWN, et al., : Plaintiffs … Nos. 30-31) are GRANTED IN PART insofar as Plaintiffs’ respective claims against the Township under Monell v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Soc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Robert Packer Hospital
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2022
Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. … Pennsylvania State University, 227 F.3d 133, 148 (3d Cir. 2000). 32 See McCann v. Miller, 502 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Social Security Administration
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 2022
At the outset, we note that it is not clear from Brown’s complaint in this case if he is seeking benefits for the same, or a different, period than that at issue in his prior case (Brown v. … The Commissioner also points out that Brown did not appeal the prior judgment in favor of the Commissioner in Brown v. Berryhill, 1:19-cv-00389 (M.D. Pa.). Instead, Brown filed this second action.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna