Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,649 results
2.22s
McGann v. U. S. Board of Parole
356 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1973
See Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 816 (1907); United States v. Rauseher, 119 U.S. 407 , 7 S.Ct. 234 , 30 L.Ed. 425 (1886). … Board of Parole.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHeilig Bros. v. National Labor Relations Board
42 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1941
That Act provides that petitions to review orders of the board shall be filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. … Petitioner can now go to the Circuit Court of Appeals and file an answer to the Board’s petition for enforcement, in which case the merits of the Board’s decision will be reviewed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMyers v. Penn Township Board of Commissioners
50 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1999
See also Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, 968 F.2d 393, 401 (3d Cir.1992) (“In Unger ... we noted that only two types of contracts have been found to be property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. … See Rocky Mountain Materials & As phalt, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 972 F.2d 309 (10th Cir.1992) (failure to pursue inverse condemnation action bars takings claim as unripe).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2025
, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-01067 v. … (8) Keri Moore, chief grievance officer for the state department of corrections; (9) Schealey Layton, a state parole agent; (10) Parole Supervisor Bittner; (11) Deborah Carpenter, secretary of the state parole board
Cited 0 timesUnknownSweeney v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Assistance Board
33 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1940
Pa. § 160, provides who shall be members of the State Board of Public Assistance, and the Attorney General is not and cannot be a member.' … district court has original jurisdiction under section 24 (14) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (14), without any allegation of diversity of citizenship and without proof that more than $3,000.00 is involved: Hague v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDavis v. Central Dauphin School District School Board
466 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1979
action was taken by the Board. … In Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344, n. 7 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), the Supreme Court, citing Board of Regents v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSkehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
436 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1977
Brown v. Greer, 296 F.Supp. 595 (S.D.Miss.1969). The clean hands doctrine bars Skehan from full reinstatement as a faculty member. … Horton v. Orange County Board of Education, 464 F.2d 536 (4th Cir. 1972). The Court would have reached this conclusion even if Skehan had acted with clean hands.
Cited 34 timesPublishedSkehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
353 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1973
Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc., 178 F.Supp. 618, 622 (S.D.N.Y.1959) (involving 4 year delay). See also Gianni Cereda Fabrics, Inc. v. … Bazaar Fabrics, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 278 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (71/2 month delay); Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Lady Marlene Brassiere Corp., 285 F.Supp. 806 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (1 year delay). Plaintiff relies on Newcomer v.
Cited 42 timesPublishedSkehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
358 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1973
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). … Ferguson v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1970). See Stevenson v. Board of Education of Wheeler County, 426 F.2d 1154 (5th Cir. 1970).
Vacated by Dr. Joseph T. Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31 (1974)Cited 17 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
503 F. Supp. 1051 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1980
Marshall, supra; Remmick v. Barnes County, 435 F.Supp. 914 (D.N.D.1977); Aaron v. Davis, 424 F.Supp. 1238 , 1241 n. 2 (E.D.Ark.1976); Usery v. Board of Education of Salt Lake, 421 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Utah 1976). … See Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 , [ 58 S.Ct. 952 , 82 L.Ed. 1424 ] (1938); State Board v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59, 64 [ 57 S.Ct. 77, 79 , 81 L.Ed. 38 ] (1936).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSkehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
431 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1977
Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 538 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1976). … Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 538 F.2d 53, 62 (3d Cir. 1976). In Wood v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2023
, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-01067 v. … On July 20, 2020, he was granted parole by the state parole board with an anticipated release date of November 26, 2020.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2024
Nov. 30, 2023) (finding that the BOP Response Plan “confirm[s] the discretion inherent in testing and quarantine procedures”); Brown v. United States, No. 22-cv-00124, 2023 WL 4744597, at *7 (N.D. W. Va. … See id.; Whitley v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023
See Schrob v. Catterson, 967 F.2d 929, 936 (3d Cir. 1992) (emphasis added)); Brown v. Mercadante, 687 F. … Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2023
Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 5, 112 S.Ct. 995, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992). Fuentes v. Wagner, 206 F.3d 335, 344–45 (3d Cir. 2000). … See e.g., Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir. 1990) (‘[A]s long as a physician exercises professional judgment his behavior will not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights’).” Gindraw v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNational Labor Relations Board v. Mesko Glass Co.
702 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1988
This matter is before us on the application of the National Labor Relations Board *523 [NLRB] for an order requiring obedience to subpoenas issued under the powers provided for in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended … Prior to the scheduled hearing the board authorized a subpoena duces tecum to be issued requiring the production of voluminous records of the respondent Mesko Glass Company for the hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2022
Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41–42, 105 S. … See Rosenfeld v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2022
Brown timely filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Docs. 64, 65.) … Boomer v. Lewis, No. 3:06-CV-00850, 2009 WL 2900778, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 9, 2009).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 2022
See Rosenfeld v. … See e.g., Branch v. Brennan, No. 2:17-CV-00777, 2019 WL 3892850, at *2 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2019); Devine v. Pittsburgh Bd. of Pub. Educ., No. 2:13-CV-220, 2015 WL 7301149, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2015); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLowe v. Board of Com'rs, County of Dauphin
750 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1990
However, as further stated by the Third Circuit in Bielevicz v. … Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1480 (3d Cir.1990) (quoting Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 481 , 106 S.Ct. 1292, 1299 , 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986)).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna