Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

2.22s

  • McGann v. U. S. Board of Parole

    356 F. Supp. 1060 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1973

    See Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 816 (1907); United States v. Rauseher, 119 U.S. 407 , 7 S.Ct. 234 , 30 L.Ed. 425 (1886). … Board of Parole.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Heilig Bros. v. National Labor Relations Board

    42 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1941

    That Act provides that petitions to review orders of the board shall be filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. … Petitioner can now go to the Circuit Court of Appeals and file an answer to the Board’s petition for enforcement, in which case the merits of the Board’s decision will be reviewed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Penn Township Board of Commissioners

    50 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1999

    See also Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, 968 F.2d 393, 401 (3d Cir.1992) (“In Unger ... we noted that only two types of contracts have been found to be property protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. … See Rocky Mountain Materials & As phalt, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 972 F.2d 309 (10th Cir.1992) (failure to pursue inverse condemnation action bars takings claim as unripe).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. G. Clemens

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2025

    , CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-01067 v. … (8) Keri Moore, chief grievance officer for the state department of corrections; (9) Schealey Layton, a state parole agent; (10) Parole Supervisor Bittner; (11) Deborah Carpenter, secretary of the state parole board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sweeney v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Assistance Board

    33 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1940

    Pa. § 160, provides who shall be members of the State Board of Public Assistance, and the Attorney General is not and cannot be a member.' … district court has original jurisdiction under section 24 (14) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (14), without any allegation of diversity of citizenship and without proof that more than $3,000.00 is involved: Hague v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Central Dauphin School District School Board

    466 F. Supp. 1259 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1979

    action was taken by the Board. … In Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344, n. 7 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), the Supreme Court, citing Board of Regents v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College

    436 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1977

    Brown v. Greer, 296 F.Supp. 595 (S.D.Miss.1969). The clean hands doctrine bars Skehan from full reinstatement as a faculty member. … Horton v. Orange County Board of Education, 464 F.2d 536 (4th Cir. 1972). The Court would have reached this conclusion even if Skehan had acted with clean hands.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College

    353 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1973

    Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc., 178 F.Supp. 618, 622 (S.D.N.Y.1959) (involving 4 year delay). See also Gianni Cereda Fabrics, Inc. v. … Bazaar Fabrics, Inc., 335 F.Supp. 278 (S.D.N.Y.1971) (71/2 month delay); Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Lady Marlene Brassiere Corp., 285 F.Supp. 806 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (1 year delay). Plaintiff relies on Newcomer v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College

    358 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1973

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). … Ferguson v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1970). See Stevenson v. Board of Education of Wheeler County, 426 F.2d 1154 (5th Cir. 1970).

    Vacated by Dr. Joseph T. Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31 (1974)Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    503 F. Supp. 1051 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1980

    Marshall, supra; Remmick v. Barnes County, 435 F.Supp. 914 (D.N.D.1977); Aaron v. Davis, 424 F.Supp. 1238 , 1241 n. 2 (E.D.Ark.1976); Usery v. Board of Education of Salt Lake, 421 F.Supp. 718, 721 (D.Utah 1976). … See Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401 , [ 58 S.Ct. 952 , 82 L.Ed. 1424 ] (1938); State Board v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59, 64 [ 57 S.Ct. 77, 79 , 81 L.Ed. 38 ] (1936).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College

    431 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1977

    Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 538 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1976). … Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 538 F.2d 53, 62 (3d Cir. 1976). In Wood v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. G. Clemens

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2023

    , CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:22-cv-01067 v. … On July 20, 2020, he was granted parole by the state parole board with an anticipated release date of November 26, 2020.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2024

    Nov. 30, 2023) (finding that the BOP Response Plan “confirm[s] the discretion inherent in testing and quarantine procedures”); Brown v. United States, No. 22-cv-00124, 2023 WL 4744597, at *7 (N.D. W. Va. … See id.; Whitley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2023

    See Schrob v. Catterson, 967 F.2d 929, 936 (3d Cir. 1992) (emphasis added)); Brown v. Mercadante, 687 F. … Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. LT. MAXWELL

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 2023

    Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 5, 112 S.Ct. 995, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992). Fuentes v. Wagner, 206 F.3d 335, 344–45 (3d Cir. 2000). … See e.g., Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir. 1990) (‘[A]s long as a physician exercises professional judgment his behavior will not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights’).” Gindraw v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Mesko Glass Co.

    702 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1988

    This matter is before us on the application of the National Labor Relations Board *523 [NLRB] for an order requiring obedience to subpoenas issued under the powers provided for in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended … Prior to the scheduled hearing the board authorized a subpoena duces tecum to be issued requiring the production of voluminous records of the respondent Mesko Glass Company for the hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. LT. MAXWELL

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2022

    Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41–42, 105 S. … See Rosenfeld v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Warden Mackenburd

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 2022

    Brown timely filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Docs. 64, 65.) … Boomer v. Lewis, No. 3:06-CV-00850, 2009 WL 2900778, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Sept. 9, 2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. LT. MAXWELL

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 2022

    See Rosenfeld v. … See e.g., Branch v. Brennan, No. 2:17-CV-00777, 2019 WL 3892850, at *2 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2019); Devine v. Pittsburgh Bd. of Pub. Educ., No. 2:13-CV-220, 2015 WL 7301149, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2015); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lowe v. Board of Com'rs, County of Dauphin

    750 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1990

    However, as further stated by the Third Circuit in Bielevicz v. … Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1480 (3d Cir.1990) (quoting Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 481 , 106 S.Ct. 1292, 1299 , 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.