Case law

MERIDIAN EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC v. REJUVENATION TREATMENT CENTER, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2025

See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Nor does specific jurisdiction exist here. … International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945).

BILLY BOY REAL ESTATE LLC v. UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 2025

Judge Tolliver appointed a new board of viewers later the same month upon recusal of the first board. Id. ¶ 134; see also November 26, 2024 Order (Defs.’ … A., Inc. v.

Parker v. Google, Inc.

422 F. Supp. 2d 492 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2006

Google also maintains the USENET, “a global system of online bulletin boards” (Doc. … Leather-man v.

BLACKWELL v. LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2023

Brown v. Children’s Hosp. of Phila., 794 Fed. Appx. 226, 227 (3d Cir. 2020) (quoting Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Med. Ctr. Of Se. Pa., 877 F.3d 487, 490 (3d Cir. 2017)). … Brown, 794 Fed. Appx. at 227-28. Particularly relevant to this Court’s analysis is the Middle District of Pennsylvania’s ruling in Finkbeiner v.

Greenbaum v. United States

360 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1973

In Somma v. … United States, supra, the Third Circuit vacated a judgment and ordered the case held in abeyance until an FECA proceeding was completed because there was a substantial question of coverage on which the Board of Employees

Butler v. Walsh

846 F. Supp. 2d 324 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2012

See Kapral v. … Brown v. Shannon, 322 F.3d 768, 773 (3d Cir.2003) (alterations in original) (citation omitted) (quoting Miller v. N.J. State Dep’t of Corr., 145 F.3d 616, 618 (3d Cir.1998)).

Paul v. United States

101 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1951

During his period of service on board said vessel, his gross earnings were $1,278.20 in wages, including a bonus of $70. 4. … In the second category of cases are Monteiro v. Paco Tankers, Inc., D.C., 93 F.Supp. 93 , and Kyriakos v. Goulandris, 2 Cir., 151 F.2d 132 .

TALLEY v. CLARK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2019

Co. v. Ahrens, 432 F. App’x 143, 148 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Bryson v. … See Harper v.

In re Reading Co.

72 B.R. 258 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1987

Abbate v. Browning Ferris Industries, 767 F.2d 52 (3d Cir. 1985). … See Kolentus v. Arco Corp., 798 F.2d 949 (7th Cir.1986) (New York law); Boase v. Lee Rubber & Tire Corp., 437 F.2d 527 (3d Cir.1970) (same); Clayton v.

Lyon v. TEMPLE UNIV. OF COM. SYSTEM OF HIGHER ED.

507 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1981

Plaintiffs, relying on Judge Higginbotham's opinion in Isaacs v. Board of Trustees of Temple University, 385 F.Supp. 473 (E.D. … Benner v. Oswald, supra ; Braden v.

WOODWARD v. BASHORE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2025

On July 19, 2023, Bashore informed the Township’s Board of Supervisors of the squirrel time practice throughout the Public Works Department.25 The Board had not been aware of squirrel time.26 It sought advice from outside … Peroza- Benitez v. Smith, 994 F.3d 157, 164 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Santini v. Fuentes, 795 F.3d 410, 416 (3d Cir. 2015)).

Ellerbe v. CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC D/B/A HARRAH'S PHILADELPHIA CASINO & RACETRACK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

Druding v. City of Philadelphia, 97 A.2d 365, 366 (Pa. 1953) (quotation marks omitted); see also Rogers v. … And with the exception of the single red line, the carpet is brown and blue, so the orange tape stands out against it. (Id.)

Stewart v. Associates Consumer Discount Co.

1 F. Supp. 2d 469 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1998

See: Jaguar Cars, 46 F.3d at 268 ; Brannon v. Boatmen’s Bancshares, Inc., 952 F.Supp. 1478, 1485 (W.D.Okla.1997); Schuylkill Skyport Inn, Inc. v. Rich, 1996 WL 502280 *31 (E.D.Pa.1996); Bieber v. … Martin v. Brown, 758 F.Supp. 313, 319 (W.D.Pa.1990).

CINTRON v. BOSTON MARKET CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 2019

v. … Miller v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 769 F.3d 204, 208 (3d Cir. 2014) (citation omitted); Brown v. JEVIC, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009).

DUFF v. PRECIOUS GEMS CHILD CARE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2020

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 83-84 (2014); Kaufman v. Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co., 561 F.3d 144, 151 (3d Cir. 2009) (citing Frederico v. … Miller v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 769 F.3d 204, 208 (3d Cir. 2014) (citation omitted); Brown v. JEVIC, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009).

Nelson v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare

244 F. Supp. 2d 382 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 2002

On November 5, 1999, Martin Nelson filed suit against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare/County Board of Assistance (“DPW”) *385 and Feather Houston, Secretary of the DPW. … The ADA Plaintiff has filed suit under both Title I and Title II of the ADA. 2 The Supreme Court in Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v.

WAZEE STREET OPPORTUNITIES FUND IV LP v. THE FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 2025

On June 17, 2024, Plaintiffs Douglas Whitley and Lisa Brown voluntarily dismissed their claims with prejudice. (ECF 53). … v.

KORNAFEL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2020

However, in Brown v. … Corp. v.

Schwarz v. TOWNSHIP OF HONEY BROOK

174 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2001

Colburn v. Upper Darby Twp., 838 F.2d 663 , 664-65 (3d Cir.1988). The “Younger abstention doctrine,” Younger v. … See Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v.

In re General Carpet Corp.

38 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1941

Section 7, sub. b, provides that “where the bankrupt is a corporation, its officers, the members of its board of directors or trustees or of other similar controlling bodies * * * shall perform the duties imposed upon the … Crutcher v. Logan, 5 Cir., 102 F.2d 612, 613 , is dispositive of the instant issue.