Case law

FOUNDATION FOR ELDERCARE V. ROCCO J. CRESCENZO

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2021

Crescenzo had no reasonable basis for believing his removal was somehow unwarranted, given his testimony that he had no interest in being on the Board in the first place and had not participated in a Board meeting in 10 … Crescenzo was not competent or interested in being on the Board arguably call into question the legitimacy of Mr. Crescenzo’s state court lawsuit to remove Mr. Berg and to regain his position on the Board.

Williams v. Collier

32 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1940

In Buffum v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 48 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 .

Trotsky v. Richardson

323 F. Supp. 1119 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1971

National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). … Dillon v. Celebrezze, 345 F.2d 753, 755 , (4th Cir. 1965); Thomas v. Celebrezze, supra, 331 F.2d, at 545 ; Underwood v. Ribicoff, supra, 298 F.2d, at 851 .

United States v. Watson

385 F. Supp. 2d 534 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2005

U.S. v. McBroom, 124 F.3d 533, 538 (3d Cir.1997). 9 . … U.S. v. Vitale, 159 F.3d 810, 816 (3d Cir.1998). 16 . Vitale, 159 F.3d at 816 . 17 . See also U.S. v. Hernandez, 89 F.Supp.2d 612, 617 (E.D.Pa.2000), citing U.S. v. Iannone, 184 F.3d 214, 226 (3d Cir.1999).

Cohen v. Temple University

578 F. Supp. 1371 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1984

In Community Medical Center v. … Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 931 , 102 S.Ct. 2744, 2751 , 73 L.Ed.2d 482 (1982). . In Braden v.

J.L. v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2022

Dunn v. Downingtown Area Sch. … Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P. ex rel.

PENDELTON v. JEVS HUMAN SERVICES, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2020

and Board Contracts, Individuals agree to pay JEVS monthly “room and board.”13 Id. … Baker v. Flint Eng’g & Const.

CHAND v. MERCK & CO., INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 2020

Although neither party cited it to the Court, Browne v. Maxfield, 663 F. Supp. 1193 (E.D. Pa. 1987) is particularly instructive for its factual similarities to the case at hand. … In Browne v.

Hamilton v. Reilly

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2022

PAPPERT, J. 5 The summons issued to the Delaware County Board of Prison Inspectors was returned unexecuted because the Board is “no longer a legal entity.” … (Summons to Delaware County Board of Prison Inspectors at 2, ECF 3.) In the fall of 2019, the Delaware County Council replaced the Board of Prison Inspectors with a newly formed Delaware County Jail Oversight Board.

Hamilton v. Allen

396 F. Supp. 2d 545 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2005

Miller (the “Individual Defendants”) are each members of the Board of Directors for the Fund Defendants. … See Gonzaga Univ. v.

LifeWatch Services, Inc. v. Highmark, Inc.

248 F. Supp. 3d 641 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2017

Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (explaining that antitrust laws “were enacted for ‘the protection of competition not competitors’ ” (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v.

CHRISTEN G. v. Lower Merion School Dist.

919 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1996

Oberti v. Board of Educ., 995 F.2d 1204 , 1213 n. 16 (3d Cir.1993) (quoting Polk, supra, at 173 ). … Judicial Review Under the IDEA As set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Board of Educ. v.

Dicioccio v. Chung

232 F. Supp. 3d 681 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 2017

Vickers v. … Toogood v. Owen J. Rogal, D.D.S, P.C., 573 Pa. 245 , 824 A.2d 1140, 1145 (2003) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). . Id. (citation omitted). . Brown v. Hahnemann, 20 F.Supp.3d 538, 542 (E.D.

United States Steel Corp. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America

237 F. Supp. 529 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1965

In Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. … The Freeman v. Howe, 24 How. 450 , 16 L.Ed. 749 (1860), and Hurn v.

Seldon v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

452 F. Supp. 2d 604 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2006

Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 798 (3d Cir.2001). The section applies to employment contracts and provides “a federal remedy against discrimination in private employment on the basis of race.” Johnson v. … Cardenas v. Massey, 269 F.3d 251, 263 (3d Cir.2001) (quoting Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh, 120 F.3d 1286, 1300 (3d Cir.1997)).

JOSE LUIS SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2026

Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). It is not enough, however, to allege the existence of a policy or custom. … Board of County Comm’rs, 520 U.S. at 404; see also Lang v. Schouppe, No. 24-1194, 2025 WL 1747077, at *5 (W.D. Pa.

Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation, Inc.

71 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1999

A “public body” is defined to include all of the following: (1) A state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board, commission, council, authority or other body in the executive branch of State government. (2) A … county, city, township, regional governing body, council, school district, special district or municipal corporation, or a board, department, commission, council or agency. (3) Any other body which is created by Commonwealth

United States v. Mahoney

508 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1981

See, e. g., United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. … United States v. Weingartner, 485 F.Supp. 1167, 1176 (D.N.J.1979), quoting United States v. Ciambrone, 601 F.2d 616, 623 (2d Cir. 1979). 6 . But see United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir. 1978). 7 .

Kendrick v. Seaboard Air Line R. R.

98 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1949

Relying on Green v. Chicago B. & O. Ry. Co., 1906, 205 U.S. 530 , 27 S.Ct. 595 , 51 L.Ed 916, Murray v. Great Northern Ry. Co., D.C.E. D.Pa.1946, 67 F.Supp. 944 , and Shambe v. D. & H. R. … See International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, supra; United States v. Scophony Corporation of America, 1948, 333 U.S. 795 , 68 S.Ct. 855 , 92 L.Ed. 1091 ; Frene v. Louisville Cement Co., 1943, 77 U.S.App.

In re Tharp Ice Cream Co.

25 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1938

The special master in recommending the confirmation of the plan suggested that such confirmation be upon condition that the plan be amended so as to give the preferred stockholders full power to elect three-fifths of the board … Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co., 8 Cir., 97 F.2d 237 .