Case law

United States Ex Rel. Snyder v. MacK

372 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

See also Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 589 , 84 S.Ct. 841 , 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964) ; United States v. … Drew v. Myers, 327 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 847 , 85 S.Ct. 88 , 13 L.Ed.2d 52 . 9 . See Brown v.

Furnival MacHinery Co. v. Joseph T. Barta Associates, Inc.

470 F. Supp. 735 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1979

Inpaco v. McDonald’s Corp., 413 F.Supp. 415, 418 (E.D.Pa.1978). … See Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Servs.

WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2022

With respect to PhillyCAM and its Board, we explained the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. Halleck, 139 S. … Neither PhillyCAM nor its Board members are parties to the franchise agreements. fundamental contract law that one cannot be liable for a breach of contract unless one is a party to that contract.” QVC, Inc. v.

Seide v. Shalala

31 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1998

Plaintiff then filed a timely Notice of Appeal and Brief with Departmental Appeals Board (“DAB”) who, on May 20, 1998, declined to review ALJ Riotto’s decision. 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21 (a), (g). … Patel v. Shalala, 17 F.Supp.2d 662, 665 (W.D.Ky.1998) (citing Garner v. Heckler, 745 F.2d 383, 387 (6th Cir.1984)).

McCoy v. Adams

29 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 7, 1939

The agreement was authorized and approved by the Boards of Directors of the Shillington Bank and Farmers National Bank and Trust Company. … Southern Exchange Bank v. First National Bank of Dublin, 1928, 37 Ga.App. 612 , 141 S.E. 323 ; O’Connor v. Bankers Trust Company, 159 Misc. 920 , 289 N.Y.S. 252 .

Yeckabofsky v. Ribicoff

206 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1962

A determination by the Pennsylvania State Board of Vocational Education concluded: “We feel on the basis of the evidence presented that W/E is not disabled. His dyspnea is not too limiting. … Ribicoff, 292 F.2d 354 (C.A.3, 1961); Parrish v. Ribicoff, supra.

Owens v. Concrete Pipe & Products Co.

125 F.R.D. 113 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1989

See, e.g., Dawsey v. … See Roberts v.

C. F. Simonin's Sons, Inc. v. Rothensies

13 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 1936

the tax or the complete paralysis of the widespread and vitally important business of the Chicago Board of Trade with its sixteen hundred members and its vast commercial interests. … In Bailey v. George, 259 U.S. 16 , 42 S.

Bruszewski v. Isthmian S. S. Co.

66 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1945

Co. v. Buzynski, 5 Cir., 19 F. 2d 871 ; Glover v. … Olszewski v. United Fruit Co. et al., D.C., 34 F.Supp. 113 ; Scheffler v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co., 2 Cir., 68 F.2d 11 ; Cunard Steamship Co. v. Smith, 2 Cir., 255 F. 846 ; Skolar v.

Reynolds v. RUCK'S MUSHROOM SERVICE, INC.

246 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2003

Defendants do not dispute that rain falling on the SMS piles produces a “wastewater runoff’ that is “blackish-brown” and “looks like oil.” … See United States v.

MOORE, SR. v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2022

Ward, Pennsylvania Parole Board Acting Secretary Scott K. Woolf, and Parole Board Hearing Examiners Escaillas and Donald (the “Parole Board Defendants”). … State Parole Board, 184 F.

Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. United States

44 F.2d 379 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1930

Everything has been done openly and above board. The railroads have not and are not taking part in the controversy. … And in another ease (Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.) involving a similar question, the Supreme Court, in the same volume, at page 529, 48 S. Ct. 404, 407 , 72 L.

In Re Penn Central Transportation Company

332 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1971

MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST CO., Trustee v. PENN CENTRAL TRUSTEES. No. 70-347. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. September 30, 1971. … Brown, Jr., New York City, for Institutional Investors, Penn Central Group. Kelley, Drye, Warren, Clark, Carr & Ellis, by Frank H. Heiss, New York City, for Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., as Trustee.

In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation

648 F. Supp. 2d 663 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2009

In Brown v. Ticor Title Ins. … Consequently, even if Brown, an opinion from another circuit, were to apply, it would not support plaintiffs’ argument.

Smith v. Hobart Manufacturing Company

185 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1960

Bowser v. Publicker Industries, Inc. et al., D.C., 101 F. Supp. 386 , citing Lance et al. v. Luzerne County Manufacturers Association, 366 Pa. 398 , 77 A.2d 386 . … Brown had requested that he not resign from that company but that he stay on as an employee and assist the Bureau in an investigation which they were making.

TRIEU v. SPOTTS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2025

City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 (1985) (quoting Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 216 (1982)). … See Newman v.

Williams v. Mercy Health System

866 F. Supp. 2d 490 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2012

Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 796 (3d Cir.2001). And, Courts ana lyze claims of discrimination pursuant to § 1981 under the same standard as Title VII. See Broum v. J. … Brown, v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 181-82 (3d Cir.2009).

Parks, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

186 F. Supp. 3d 405 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 2016

Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Prods., Inc., 538 F.3d 185, 200 (3d Cir.2008). Parks, however, has not done so. … Browne, 538 F.3d at 201 . Nonetheless, survey evidence, when it is available, may be “direct and persuasive evidence of secondary meaning.” See Co-Rect Prods., Inc. v. Marvyl Advert.

McMichael v. Chester Housing Authority

325 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1971

McFadden, a member of the Board of Commissioners of the Chester Housing Authority, and its director of tenant relations also attended. Mr. Hall was present for a brief part of the meeting. … In Randell v. Newark Housing Authority, 384 F.2d 151 (3rd Cir. 1967); cert. denied sub nom. Avent v.

Forrest v. Case

604 F. Supp. 349 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1985

As authority for this proposition, defendants cited two cases from this district that found the Supreme Court holding of Parratt v. … Since the filing of defendants’ motion for reconsideration, the Third Circuit, in Davidson v.