Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.42s
Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp.
836 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1993
Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 353 F.Supp. 542, 542 (M.D.Pa.1973). They will only be granted when plaintiff can demonstrate the requisite elements of the remedy. … See Hollander v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021
Ct. at 2301; see also Street v. … See Miller v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown79 F. Supp. 268 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1948
National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 , and what was said in both the majority and dissenting opinions in Stark et al v. Wickard, supra. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 303 , 64 S.Ct 95, 97 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . 12 “However, even where a complaint possesses a claim to executive action beneficial to him, created by federal statute, it does not necessarily
Cited 7 timesPublishedGuy C. Long, Inc. v. Park Plaza Development Corp. (In Re Guy C. Long, Inc.)
90 B.R. 99 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1988
U.S.S.E.C., 692 F.2d 102, 105-106 (10th Cir.1982); Board of Education of Valley View v. Bosworth, 713 F.2d 1316, 1322 (7th Cir.1982); Chintala v. Diamond Reo Trucks, Inc., 393 F.Supp. 1392 (E.D.Pa.1975). … See also Williams v. Red Bank Board of Education, 662 F.2d 1008 (3d Cir.1981). In re Tidwell Industries, Inc., at 350.
Cited 7 timesPublishedKEYSTONE SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LLC v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2021
In contrast to Lockhart and Totty, Plaintiffs argue that this Court should find that the Chubb Defendants are their “de facto insurers” under Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493 (Pa. Super. 2004). … While the Chubb 4 See also Hogan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2022
Adorno v. Shalala, 40 F.3d 43, 48 (3d Cir.1994) (citations omitted); see also Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 (3d Cir. 2011) (permitting an ALJ to give greater weight to certain medical evaluations over others). … Chandler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 667 F.3d 356, 361 (3d Cir. 2011) RFC finding is an administrative, rather than a medical, determination. See id.; see also Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown166 F. Supp. 2d 240 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2001
Savage Sports Corporation’s current board of directors consists of three individuals in addition to Ronald Coburn. … Two of these officers joined the board when Coburn purchased Savage Arms through Savage Sports Corporation in 1995, and the fourth joined the board more recently. (Ex. E.37-38).
Cited 4 timesPublishedKusner v. First Pennsylvania Corporation
395 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1975
In Kauffman v. … Plaintiff recites at paragraph 30 of his complaint : “Plaintiff has made no demand upon the board of trustees of Trust to bring and prosecute this action.
Reversed on other grounds by David B. KUSNER, Appellant, v. FIRST PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION Et Al., 531 F.2d 1234 (1976)Cited 14 timesPublishedFerdinand Drexel Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alibert
723 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1989
Vernon was President and member of the Board of directors of Columbia I and Vice President and a member of the board of Directors of Alibert Properties I and Alibert Industries I (Response, pp. 4 & 5). … In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLucas v. Philco-Ford Corporation
380 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1974
Code of Ethics, plaintiff could petition the International Executive Board to accept original jurisdiction of the charge itself. … Vaca v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedCassidy v. Welfare & Pension Fund for the Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry
580 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1983
The next appeal level is the Board of Trustees of the Fund. … See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, 637 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.1981), Aitken v. IP & GCU-Employee Retirement Fund, 604 F.2d 1261 , 1264 (9th Cir.1979); Rueda v.
Cited 2 timesPublished469 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1979
See Standard Oil Division, American Oil Co. v. Starks, 528 F.2d 201 (7th Cir. 1975); Grasso v. United States Postal Service, 438 F.Supp. 1231 (D.Conn.1977). … Section 3628 governs appellate review of decisions by the Postal Service Board of Governors to “approve, allow under protest, or modify recommended decisions of the Postal Rate Commission.” 2 . Rosenblum v.
Cited 7 timesPublished69 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1946
Carr knew that Banks at times sent lighters without captains aboard and he asked Bennett if he had captains aboard; Bennett said no, but he would have a man on board. … Mulvaney v. King Paint Mfg. Co., supra; Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transp. Co., supra; Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R., supra; Schoonmaker-Conners Co. v. Lambert Trans.
Cited 10 timesPublishedPreemption Devices Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
630 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1985
See Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. … The 170 contains an input file with preprepared slots ready for insertion of printed circuit boards. (T.Tr. at 125).
Cited 4 timesPublished816 F. Supp. 1064 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1993
Stafford v. Muscogee County Board of Education, 688 F.2d 1383 , 1390 *1069 (11th Cir.1982); Cuffy v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 648 F.Supp. 802, 808 (D.Del.1986). … Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co., 701 F.Supp. 208, 211 (S.D.Fla.1988) citing Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983), and Milton v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2022
Brown, 196 A.3d at 146. … But where it is a discretion forbidden in the “strongest terms,” Brown, 196 A.3d at 146, a concern emerges that these concessions serve an improper purpose. Cf. Lambrix v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWILLIAMS v. Team Management and Consulting LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2021
S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 918-19 (2011). The plaintiff must establish “either that the cause of action arose from the 4 See Def. Ex. A. … Medical Mut. of Ohio v. deSoto, 245 F.3d 561, 566-67(6th Cir. 2001); Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund v. Elite Erectors, Inc., 212 F.3d 1031, 1035 (7th Cir. 2000); Federal Fountain, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown358 F. Supp. 2d 442 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2005
Moreover, unlike in Brown , Murphy was not buying these guns in “arms length” transactions with Ellis and Zom-ber. … (internal citation omitted) (quoting McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 358 , 107 S.Ct. 2875 , 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987)). 18 . Brown, 79 F.3d at 1559 . 19 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedCoral Aviation Group v. Muller, Jr.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2024
See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943).7 This doctrine may extend to 7 Though Parker discussed immunity under the Sherman Act, it also applies to claims brought under the Clayton Act. F.T.C. v. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJoseph v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
126 F. Supp. 2d 373 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2000
Prior to the System Board’s hearing, Plaintiff had filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) on December 17, 1997. … (citations omitted); Hicks v.
Cited 30 timesPublished
Ask Donna