Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

5.42s

  • Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp.

    836 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1993

    Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 353 F.Supp. 542, 542 (M.D.Pa.1973). They will only be granted when plaintiff can demonstrate the requisite elements of the remedy. … See Hollander v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • MARSHALL v. CLARKE

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 2021

    Ct. at 2301; see also Street v. … See Miller v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Koster v. Turchi

    79 F. Supp. 268 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1948

    National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 , and what was said in both the majority and dissenting opinions in Stark et al v. Wickard, supra. … National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 303 , 64 S.Ct 95, 97 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . 12 “However, even where a complaint possesses a claim to executive action beneficial to him, created by federal statute, it does not necessarily

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Guy C. Long, Inc. v. Park Plaza Development Corp. (In Re Guy C. Long, Inc.)

    90 B.R. 99 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1988

    U.S.S.E.C., 692 F.2d 102, 105-106 (10th Cir.1982); Board of Education of Valley View v. Bosworth, 713 F.2d 1316, 1322 (7th Cir.1982); Chintala v. Diamond Reo Trucks, Inc., 393 F.Supp. 1392 (E.D.Pa.1975). … See also Williams v. Red Bank Board of Education, 662 F.2d 1008 (3d Cir.1981). In re Tidwell Industries, Inc., at 350.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • KEYSTONE SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LLC v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2021

    In contrast to Lockhart and Totty, Plaintiffs argue that this Court should find that the Chubb Defendants are their “de facto insurers” under Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493 (Pa. Super. 2004). … While the Chubb 4 See also Hogan v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ambrose v. SAUL

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 2022

    Adorno v. Shalala, 40 F.3d 43, 48 (3d Cir.1994) (citations omitted); see also Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 (3d Cir. 2011) (permitting an ALJ to give greater weight to certain medical evaluations over others). … Chandler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 667 F.3d 356, 361 (3d Cir. 2011) RFC finding is an administrative, rather than a medical, determination. See id.; see also Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gower v. Savage Arms, Inc.

    166 F. Supp. 2d 240 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2001

    Savage Sports Corporation’s current board of directors consists of three individuals in addition to Ronald Coburn. … Two of these officers joined the board when Coburn purchased Savage Arms through Savage Sports Corporation in 1995, and the fourth joined the board more recently. (Ex. E.37-38).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kusner v. First Pennsylvania Corporation

    395 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1975

    In Kauffman v. … Plaintiff recites at paragraph 30 of his complaint : “Plaintiff has made no demand upon the board of trustees of Trust to bring and prosecute this action.

    Reversed on other grounds by David B. KUSNER, Appellant, v. FIRST PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION Et Al., 531 F.2d 1234 (1976)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ferdinand Drexel Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alibert

    723 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1989

    Vernon was President and member of the Board of directors of Columbia I and Vice President and a member of the board of Directors of Alibert Properties I and Alibert Industries I (Response, pp. 4 & 5). … In Sedima, S.P.R.L. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lucas v. Philco-Ford Corporation

    380 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1974

    Code of Ethics, plaintiff could petition the International Executive Board to accept original jurisdiction of the charge itself. … Vaca v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Cassidy v. Welfare & Pension Fund for the Mid-Jersey Trucking Industry

    580 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1983

    The next appeal level is the Board of Trustees of the Fund. … See Rosen v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, 637 F.2d 592 (3d Cir.1981), Aitken v. IP & GCU-Employee Retirement Fund, 604 F.2d 1261 , 1264 (9th Cir.1979); Rueda v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pearlstine v. United States

    469 F. Supp. 1044 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1979

    See Standard Oil Division, American Oil Co. v. Starks, 528 F.2d 201 (7th Cir. 1975); Grasso v. United States Postal Service, 438 F.Supp. 1231 (D.Conn.1977). … Section 3628 governs appellate review of decisions by the Postal Service Board of Governors to “approve, allow under protest, or modify recommended decisions of the Postal Rate Commission.” 2 . Rosenblum v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Chas. Kurz Co.

    69 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1946

    Carr knew that Banks at times sent lighters without captains aboard and he asked Bennett if he had captains aboard; Bennett said no, but he would have a man on board. … Mulvaney v. King Paint Mfg. Co., supra; Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transp. Co., supra; Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R., supra; Schoonmaker-Conners Co. v. Lambert Trans.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Preemption Devices Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

    630 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1985

    See Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. … The 170 contains an input file with preprepared slots ready for insertion of printed circuit boards. (T.Tr. at 125).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

    816 F. Supp. 1064 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1993

    Stafford v. Muscogee County Board of Education, 688 F.2d 1383 , 1390 *1069 (11th Cir.1982); Cuffy v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 648 F.Supp. 802, 808 (D.Del.1986). … Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co., 701 F.Supp. 208, 211 (S.D.Fla.1988) citing Berry v. Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983), and Milton v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • WHARTON v. VAUGHN

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2022

    Brown, 196 A.3d at 146. … But where it is a discretion forbidden in the “strongest terms,” Brown, 196 A.3d at 146, a concern emerges that these concessions serve an improper purpose. Cf. Lambrix v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WILLIAMS v. Team Management and Consulting LLC

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2021

    S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 918-19 (2011). The plaintiff must establish “either that the cause of action arose from the 4 See Def. Ex. A. … Medical Mut. of Ohio v. deSoto, 245 F.3d 561, 566-67(6th Cir. 2001); Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund v. Elite Erectors, Inc., 212 F.3d 1031, 1035 (7th Cir. 2000); Federal Fountain, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Zomber

    358 F. Supp. 2d 442 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2005

    Moreover, unlike in Brown , Murphy was not buying these guns in “arms length” transactions with Ellis and Zom-ber. … (internal citation omitted) (quoting McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 358 , 107 S.Ct. 2875 , 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987)). 18 . Brown, 79 F.3d at 1559 . 19 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Coral Aviation Group v. Muller, Jr.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2024

    See Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943).7 This doctrine may extend to 7 Though Parker discussed immunity under the Sherman Act, it also applies to claims brought under the Clayton Act. F.T.C. v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Joseph v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

    126 F. Supp. 2d 373 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2000

    Prior to the System Board’s hearing, Plaintiff had filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) on December 17, 1997. … (citations omitted); Hicks v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.