Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

2.73s

  • United States v. Almeida

    24 F. Cas. 775 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1847

    S. v. Bladen [Case No. 14,606]; U. S. v. Smith [Id. 16,344]; U. S. v. Smith [Id. 16,345]; U. S. v. Kelly [Id. 15,516]; U. S. v. Smith [Id. 16,337]; U. S. v. Hamilton [Id. 15,291]; U. S. v. Keefe [Id. 15,509]; U. S. v. … S. v. Cassedy [Id. 14,745]; U. S. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Natale v. Schwartz

    151 F. Supp. 2d 562 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2001

    The demolition permit was not reviewed by the East Vincent Township Zoning Hearing Board [“Zoning Hearing Board”]. See id. ¶¶ 18 & 23. … Lake v. Arnold, 112 F.3d 682, 685 (3d Cir.l997)(citing United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Local 610 v. Scott, 463 U.S. 825 , 103 S.Ct. 3352 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1983); Griffin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Osser

    326 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1971

    See Kauffman v. Osser, 321 F.Supp. 327 (E.D.Pa.1971); Gilhool v. … Chairman and Commissioners, Philadelphia County Board of Elections et al., 306 F.Supp. 1202 (E.D.Pa.1969), aff’d, 397 U.S. 147 , 90 S.Ct. 996 , 25 L.Ed.2d 182 (1970). See generally Moody v.

    Disagreed with by Frederika Blankner v. The City of Chicago, 504 F.2d 1037 (1974)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lauren De Camara, Sasha Kachru, and Esénia Bañuelos v. Bryn Mawr College, The Board of Trustees of Bryn Mawr College

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2025

    Grp., LLC v. Del. … Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Action Manufacturing Co. v. Simon Wrecking Co.

    375 F. Supp. 2d 411 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2005

    Meier v. Sun Intern. … Dutoit v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Kershentsev v. Mascotte Productions, Inc.

    781 F. Supp. 339 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1991

    Whitelock v. Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir.1972). … See Dubern v. Girard Trust Bank, 454 F.2d 565, 570 (3d Cir.1972); Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Ins. Agency, 151 Pa.Super. 146 , 30 A.2d 333 (1943). 11 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gillis v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.

    818 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1992

    Gillis, and the other employees on January 20, 1989, and also posted copies on company bulletin boards. … See Gridley v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co., 924 F.2d 1310 (3d Cir.1991).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Fabricare v. Township of Falls

    101 F. Supp. 2d 301 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 2000

    City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439 , 105 S.Ct. 3249, 3254 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); see also Vacco v. … See General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Endres v. Blount

    329 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

    In Finfer v. Caplin, 344 F.2d 38 (2nd Cir. 1965) an Internal Revenue Service *853 officer was arrested on the charge of accepting a bribe from a taxpayer. … In Parker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coyle v. Kristjan Palusalu Maritime Co., Ltd.

    83 F. Supp. 2d 535 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2000

    Coyle alleges that, on May 13, 1998, her husband suffered'personal injuries as a result of a fall while oil board the M/V Kristjan Palusalu, a vessel owned by KPMC. At the time of the alleged injury, Mr. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Coggins v. McQueen

    447 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1978

    Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • SOLOMON

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 2026

    County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 846 (1998). A state board’s decision denying parole may violate substantive due process only if it shocks the conscience. Newman v. … A federal court may not “second-guess” a parole board if “there is some basis” for its decision. Coady v. Vaughn, 251 F.3d 480, 487 (3d Cir. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • THORN FLATS, LLC v. BUILDPRO CONSTRUCTION LLC

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 2022

    Post-judgment interest is “calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve … Those invoices show that five individuals at the law firm Gellert, Scali, Busenkell & Brown worked on the case: Charles J. Brown III (Partner; hourly rate $425), Margaret F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Institute of Pennsylvania Hospital v. Travelers Insurance

    825 F. Supp. 727 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1993

    Albert Einstein Medical Center v. National Benefit Fund for Hospital & Health Care Employees, 740 F.Supp. 343, 348 (E.D.Pa.1989). See Also: Franchise Tax Board v. … Shiffler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of U.S., 609 F.Supp. 832, 835 (E.D.Pa.1985) citing, inter alia, Franchise Tax Board, supra, 463 U.S. at 22 , 103 S.Ct. at 2853 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Parks v. " MR. FORD"

    386 F. Supp. 1251 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 1975

    Brown, The Law of Personal Property § 119 (2d. ed. 1955); Smyth v. … See Com. of Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors of City Trusts [ 353 U.S. 230 , 77 S.Ct. 806 , 1 L.Ed.2d 792 (1957)].

    Reversed on other grounds by Parks v. Mr. Ford, 556 F.2d 132 (1977)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Porter v. City of Phila.

    337 F. Supp. 3d 530 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2018

    Witnesses for Defendants Angellinel Brown Angellinel Brown, one of the deputies who subdued Porter, testified that she was alerted to a disturbance at the sheriff's sale. … board, requested that the plaintiff not mention the names of certain township supervisors, whereupon the defendant asked the plaintiff to sit down.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Acevedo v. City of Philadelphia

    680 F. Supp. 2d 716 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2010

    Hohider v. … If the employee is dissatisfied with the outcome, he may, at his own expense, seek review by the Medical Board and may present to the Board any medical histories, reports, or testimony. (Regulation 32 § 32.0313.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • CONTEE v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 2021

    See Hicks v. Brown Fam. Shoprite Inc. of Cheltenham, Civ. A. No. 08-5830, 2009 WL 3055393, at *1-2 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 24, 2009); Cameron v. Infoconsulting Int’l, LLC, Civ. A. No. 04-4365, 2006 WL 1450842, at *5-7 (E.D. … Graves v. Lowery, 117 F.3d 723, 729 (3d Cir. 1997). Therefore, whether a plaintiff is an employee is a fact-intensive inquiry that can rarely be resolved on a motion to dismiss. See Brown v. Bank of Am., N.A., 5 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Levin v. Ripple Twist Mills, Inc.

    416 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1976

    Board. … Spray Refrigeration Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • SIMMONS, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 21, 2022

    Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001); Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir. 1988). … See Brown, 845 F.2d at 1214.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.