Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.23s
493 F. Supp. 1168 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1980
Healthy Board of Education v. … Allen v. State Board of Elections [ 393 U.S. 544 ] at 572 [ 89 S.Ct. 817 at 835 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 ] . . ..
Cited 15 timesPublished92 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1950
Continental Collieries v. Shober, 3 Cir., 130 F.2d 631, 635 . Tested by this standard, the complaint survives the motion. … of his capital contribution; that a “collusive arrangement” was entered into to effect a withdrawal of the remainder of defendant’s contribution; and that pursuant to the “scheme and purpose aforesaid” a meeting of the board
Cited 2 timesPublishedPAC-WEST DISTRIBUTING NV LLC v. AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 2023
Courts that have adopted the unlawful use doctrine have typically also followed the precedents of the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). See, e.g., Dessert Beauty, Inc. v. … See, e.g, In re Morgan Brown, 119 U.S.P.Q.2d 1350, 2016 WL 4140917, at *3 (I.T.A.B. 2016); Kiva Health Brands LLC y. Kiva Brands, Inc., 402 F. Supp. 3d 877, 889 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRhodes v. Social Security Administration
79 F. Supp. 498 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1947
and consistently applied by the Board and its successor, the Social Security Administration, in all cases in which the same issue has arisen. … Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 369 , 66 S.Ct 637, 643 , 90 L.Ed. 718 , 162 A.L.R. 1445 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedChristenson S. S. Co. v. United States
17 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1936
S. v. The Betsy & Charlotte, 4 Cranch, 443, 452 , 2 L.Ed. 673 . … United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedScott Paper Company v. United States
372 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1974
Federal Maritime Comm’s, 383 U.S. 607, 620 , 86 S.Ct. 1018 , 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800 , 93 S.Ct. 2367 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973).
Cited 8 timesPublishedTidewater Grain Co. v. S.S. Point Manatee
614 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1984
Sun Oil Co. v. Dalzell Towing Co., 287 U.S. 291 , 53 S.Ct. 135 , 77 L.Ed. 311 (1932); Am erada Hess Corp. v. … Gaudet v. Exxon Corp., 562 F.2d 351, 357 (5th Cir.1977); Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co., 413 F.2d 310, 314 (5th Cir.1969); Gudgel v. Southern Shippers, Inc., 387 F.2d 723 (7th Cir.1967); McCollum v.
Cited 3 timesPublished97 F.R.D. 543 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1983
Board of Education, 407 F.Supp. 1166 (E.D. N.Y.1976); Eastridge v. Fruehauf Corporation, 52 F.R.D. 129 (W.D.Ky.1971); Harvey v. Eimco, 32 F.R.D. 598 (E.D.Pa.1963); Emich Motors Corp. v. … Strauss v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Eighteen Packages of Dental Instruments
222 F. 121 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1915
The Lace House v. United States, 141 Fed. 869 , 73 C. C. A. 103 . … Board of General Appraisers, T. D. 26664, G. A. 6132.
Vacated on other grounds by United States v. Eighteen Packages of Dental Instruments, 230 F. 564 (1916)Cited 1 timesPublishedTurkey Run Fuels, Inc. v. United States
139 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1956
It cites Kohinoor Coal Co. v. … See Palmer v. Bender, 1933, 287 U.S. 551 , 53 S.Ct. 225 , 77 L.Ed. 489 ; Helvering v. Bankline Oil Co., 1938, 303 U.S. 362 , 58 S.Ct. 616 , 82 L.Ed. 897 ; Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished337 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1971
The state is not responsible for any debts incurred and most responsibilities lie with the board and not with state officials. … See Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority, 379 Pa. 566 , 109 A.2d 331 (1954); Sierra Club v. Sanitary Water Board, 3 Pa.Cmwlth. 110 , 281 A.2d 256 (1971); and William A. Carey & Co. v.
Cited 11 timesPublished243 F. 720 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1917
If the master of the vessel delivers all the cargo which was taken on board, the only inference to be drawn from a discrepancy in the weights is that one or the other is incorrect. … A supporting authority to sustain the measure of the evidentiary value given to the bill of lading is found in the case of James v. Standard Oil (D. C.) 189 Fed. 719 , appeal ruling 191 Fed. 827 , 112 C. C. A. 341 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedRoadway Express, Inc. v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local No. 107
299 F. Supp. 1058 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 1969
United Mine Workers of America v. … In this connection, he now for the first time invokes the doctrine of Mastro Plastics Corp. v.
Cited 13 timesPublished294 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1969
In Brooks v. … Finally, in United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHAILEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2020
Jan. 15, 2020) (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 694). 88 Jiminez v. All American Rathskeller, Inc., 503 F.3d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 2007). 8 Salvato, 2020 WL 247880, at *3 (citing Brown v. … No. 30 at 30. 126 Td at 431. 127 Tq at 30. 128 Td at J 40. 129 Ig 130 Ig 131 Brown v. Hamilton Police Department, No. 13-260, 2013 WL 3189040, at *2 (D.N.J. June 21, 2013); see Willson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown87 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1949
That was all that was decided in National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 309 U.S. 206 , 60 S.Ct. 493, 498 , 84 L.Ed. 704 . … This is substantially what was decided in Newman v. United States, D.C., 50 F.Supp. 66 . All three conditions are present in the case of each of these libellants. The libellants are not entitled to penalties.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2021
Milt Warrell is the Bucks County Sheriff who is also a member of the Board. Ann Russavage-Faust appears to be a public defender in Bucks County as well as a member of the Board. … Comm'rs of Bryan Cty, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)); see also Lomax v. City of Philadelphia, Civ. A. No. 13-1078, 2017 WL 1177095, at *3 (E.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFidelity Bank v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
341 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1972
Count I alleges that the lease was and is unconscionably unfair and burdensome to Harlem, and that at the time of execution of the lease, the lessee owned a majority of the stock and controlled the Board of Directors of Harlem … Spalitta v. Naional American Bank, 444 F.2d 291, 294 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 883 , 92 S.Ct. 212 , 30 L.Ed.2d 164 (1971).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoberts v. Caesar's Entertainment, Inc.
72 F. Supp. 3d 575 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2014
DiBella v. Borough of Beachwood, 407 F.3d 599, 603 (3d Cir.2005) (citations omitted); Gallo v. City of Philadelphia, 161 F.3d 217, 222-24 (3d Cir.1998) (interpreting Albright v. … See Basile v. Twp. of Smith, 752 F.Supp.2d 643, 659 (W.D.Pa.2010) (citing Penberth v. Krajnak, No. 06-1023, 2008 WL 509174 , at *17-18 (M.D.Pa. Feb. 21, 2008)); see also Lopez v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMacvaugh v. Cnty. of Montgomery
301 F. Supp. 3d 458 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2018
See Mercer v. … See Bernhard v. Brown & Brown of Lehigh Valley, Inc. , 720 F.Supp.2d 694 , 703 (E.D. Pa. 2010). See id.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna