Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Deans v. Kennedy House, Inc.

    998 F. Supp. 2d 393 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2014

    Anjelino v. N.Y. Times Co., 200 F.3d 73, 98 (3d Cir.1999); see also Anderson, 621 F.3d at 267 ; Brown v. … He appealed the denial to the Unemployment Compensation Review Board, which reversed and awarded him benefits. Unemployment Compensation Review Board Decision 3.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Delaware River Port Authority v. Fraternal Order of Police

    135 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2001

    The Compact provides for a Board of Commissioners (“the Board”) to manage the DRPA’s affairs. The Board consists of eight (8) commissioners from each state for a total of sixteen (16) Commissioners. See N.J. Stat. … II). 2 The authority of the Board to manage the affairs of the DRPA is limited in three ways. First, a majority of each state’s delegation must approve the Board’s action. See N.J. Stat. Ann. § 32:3-4 ; 36 Pa.

    Reversed on other grounds by Delaware River Port Authority v. Fraternal Order of Police, 290 F.3d 567 (2002)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagle

    665 F. Supp. 1147 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1987

    Klebanoff has failed to comply with the Act’s requirement *1156 that he submit second trimester tissue remains to a board eligible or board certified pathologist. Dr. … This “expert” is neither board certified nor board eligible. 8 Dr. Klebanoff did not testify that he made independent arrangements to comply with section 3214(c). To the contrary, Dr.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Building Materials Corp. of America v. Rotter

    535 F. Supp. 2d 518 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 2008

    Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 452 (3d Cir.2006). However, it is “not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation.” Papasan v. … Queen City, 124 F.3d at 436 (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S., 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In re Appold

    1 F. Cas. 1075 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 1868

    [Buckey v. Snouffer,] 10 Md. 156 . … Brown, [unreported,] an involuntary bankrupt, (21 October, 1867,) this court was of opinion that rent might be paid by the assignees on the same footing as under an execution, and that an equal amount as accruing storage

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • GRAB v. COLUMBIA BOROUGH

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 10, 2022

    Brown v. Makofka, 644 F. App’x 139, 142 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Santini v. Fuentes, 795 F.3d 410, 417 (3d Cir. 2015)). … Brown, 484 F. App’x at 681.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.

    102 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 1952

    Diesbourg v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., 3 Cir., 176 F.2d 410 , Curtis v. Campbell, 3 Cir., 76 F.2d 84 . The law of Pennsylvania recognizes a cause of action created at the place of the alleged wrongdoing. See Sumner v. … Turner, Plaintiff, v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • VERNA BY VERNA v. US Suzuki Motor Corp.

    713 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1989

    Posey Co., 766 F.2d 131, 134-135 (3d Cir.1985); Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 741 F.2d 656 (3d Cir.1984); Zimmerman v. Baker-Perkins, Inc., 707 F.Supp. 778 (E.D.Pa.1989); Sherk v. … Brown, supra, 741 F.2d at 661 . Defendants also attack plaintiffs’ duty to warn allegation on grounds of causation.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. School Dist. of Philadelphia

    597 F. Supp. 1309 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1984

    Plaintiff filed a civil rights suit against the School District of Philadelphia, its Superintendent, the Board of Education, and her union, the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers (“PFT”). … Count IX alleges that the defendants violated state law by providing “unsworn falsification” at school board meetings regarding voluntary employee transfers.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • The Curtin

    165 F. 271 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1908

    No. 2,276; James Dalzell’s Son v. Kaine (D. C.) 31 Fed. 748 ; Hays v. Rees, 93 Fed. 984 , 36 C. C. A. 45 . As is stated in 26 Cyc. 786, § 5: “Tlie basis of a lien for necessaries is a benefit rendered the vessel. … Hence, in order for such a lien to arise, the necessaries must be either delivered on board the vessel, or brought into immediate relations to her, as by being delivered on the wharf or into the custody of some one authorized

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Quinones v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MORELAND, ETC., PA.

    187 F. Supp. 260 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 1960

    Bradstreet Co., 1890, 134 Pa. 161 , 19 A. 500 , 7 L.R.A. 661 ; Brown v. Moore, 3 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 711 , 69 A.L.R.2d 288 ; Migias v. United States, D.C.W.D. Pa.1958, 167 F.Supp. 482 ; Burns v. … Contra, Brown v. Dickey, 1959, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 830 . 26 .

    Modified by Quinones v. Township of Upper Moreland, 293 F.2d 237 (1961)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States v. Miah

    444 F. Supp. 996 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1977

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 227-30 , 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973). … United States v. Williams, 526 F.2d 1000, 1002-3 (6th Cir. 1975); Brown v. United States, 356 F.2d 230, 232 (10th Cir. 1966); United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Reserve Supply Co. v. Nowalk & Associates, Inc.

    864 F. Supp. 1456 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1994

    While here the Board of Directors also had legitimate goals and a formal structure, plaintiff has sufficiently alleged that the members of the Board acted together for a common illegal goal of defrauding plaintiff. … See Carpenter v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • The Annasona

    166 F. 801 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1909

    Virginia Ehrman v. Curtis, 97 U. S. 309 , 24 L. Ed. 890 ; Rong Island Railroad Co. v. Killien, 67 Fed. 365 , 14 C. C. A. 418 . … C.) 12 Fed. 238 ; The Silica v. The Lord Worden (D. C.) 27 Fed. 467 ; The Baman (D.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Savage

    677 F. Supp. 2d 756 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2009

    United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 247 (3d Cir.2006). … United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 249-50 (3d Cir.2006). In this case, the woman’s tip bore indicia of reliability. The woman could have been held responsible had she misinformed police.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sundheim v. Ridge Avenue Bank

    138 F. 951 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1905

    Maynes, who seemed to be managing the leather company’s business, that the board would insist upon a satisfactory settlement of the note when it fell due. … Wetstein v. Pranciscus (C. C. A.) 133 Ped. 900; In re Andrews (D. C.) 135 Fed. 599 ; Thomas v. Adelman (D. C.) 136 Fed. 973 . The motion for a new trial is overruled.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Druckenmiller v. United States

    548 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1982

    Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 321-22 , 95 S.Ct. 992, 1000-01 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975). Harlow v. … Brown v. United States, 653 F.2d 196, 201 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1970 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Williams v. United States

    412 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1976

    Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973), and also violates the Parole Board’s own regulations as set forth in 28 C.F.R. §§ 2.54 , 2.55. … While on parole, petitioner was subject to supervision not by this court, but by the Board of Parole. It is the latter agency which had the power to revoke his parole.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • BONILLA v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2019

    Harris v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., No. 08-563, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56193, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2016); Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp., 867 F. Supp. 319, 320 (E.D. Pa. 1994). … Opn. 9-10 (citing Zinermon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Philadelphia National Bank v. Employing Bricklayers' Ass'n of Philadelphia

    169 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1959

    McGough, the Union’s lawful representatives on the Board of Trustees of the Welfare Fund.” … United Marine Division v. Essex Transportation Co., 3 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 410 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.