Case law

Pennsylvania Family Institute, Inc. v. Celluci

521 F. Supp. 2d 351 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2007

The Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board (“the Board”), established by Article V, § 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, is empowered to receive and investigate complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or … See Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, 997 F.2d 224 (7th Cir.1993); Duwe v.

United States v. Payment Processing Center, LLC

435 F. Supp. 2d 462 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 2006

Brown, 988 F.2d at 663 . To give meaning to all provisions in the statute, see Bailey v. … News 6476-77, 6584; see also Brown 988 F.2d at 662 .

Pottstown Finance Co. v. United States

73 F. Supp. 1011 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1947

John Kelley Co. v. Commissioner, 326 U.S. 521 , 66 S.Ct. 299 , 90 L.Ed. 278 . Whether the facts found establish a creditor-debtor relationship is a question of law for the court. United States v. … In this Circuit, the court has laid' down in John Wanamaker Philadelphia v.

SMALLS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2025

See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F. … App’x 239, 240 (3d Cir. 2018) (per curiam); Brown v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 763 F.

Wynn v. United States

288 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1968

Pierce Corp. v. … Plummer v.

Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. Feraco

4 F.R.D. 400 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 1945

Corbin, 285 Pa. 273 , 132 A. 364 ; Brown, Rights and Duties of Bailor and Bailee Under the Law of Pennsylvania (1944) 18 Temp.L.Q. 199, 202. … Old Rock Distilling Co., D.C.W.D.Mo., 3 F.R.D. 179 ; Marcus v. Hinck, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 28 F.Supp. 945 ; Teiger v. Stephan Oderwald, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 31 F.Supp. 626 ; Mendola v.

Schanne v. Addis

898 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2012

Milliner v. Enck, 709 A.2d 417 , 419 n. 1 (Pa.Super.Ct.1998). This includes hearings before tribunals that perform judicial functions, such as proceedings by administrative officers, boards, and commissions. Id. … Marino v.

Lang v. Colonial Pipeline Company

266 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1967

Black and White Taxicab and Transfer Co. v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab and Transfer Co., 276 U.S. 518 , 48 S.Ct. 404 , 72 L.Ed. 681 (1928). … Black and White Taxicab and Transfer Co. v. Brown and Yellow Taxicab and Transfer Co., supra at 524, 48 S.Ct. at 405 .

Speziale v. Bethlehem Area School District

266 F. Supp. 2d 366 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2003

Desper v. … Only the school board had that authority, and plaintiff never communicated with members of the school board about his employment. See 24 P.S. § 11-1122 (Purdon 1992).

Farr's, Inc. v. National Shoes, Inc.

191 F. Supp. 803 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1960

Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co., 1925, 267 U.S. 333 , 45 S.Ct. 250 , 69 L.Ed. 634 ; Fergus Motors v. … of the Patent Office when the order of July 1960, staying the proceedings before such Board, was entered.

Gagliardi Bros., Inc. v. Caputo

538 F. Supp. 525 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1982

As its controller Caputo was one of Gagliardi’s key employees, and attended all Board of Directors (pre-1980) and Management Board (1980 to 1981) meetings. … Prior approval of the Board of Directors was not obtained.

Wilkinson v. Abrams

81 F.R.D. 52 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1978

Scheur v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Helstoski v. Goldstein, 552 F.2d 564 (3d Cir. 1977); accord, Husbands v. Comm. of Pa., 359 F.Supp. 925 (E.D.Pa.1973). … Both Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), and Graves v.

DETTY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2026

Detty asked Brown to supply gloves and paper masks, but Brown did not do so, although he said that he would order them hot meals once they were done. (Id. at 9, ¶ 73.) … The Court’s conclusions as to the claims against Brown are therefore also fatal to his claims against Cruz, such that further efforts to serve her would be “an idle exercise.” See Talley v.

HORIZON STEVEDORING, INC. v. ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2022

With respect to the last element, RWC must show Horizon’s and/or Brown’s “acts or omissions were a substantial factor in bringing about its harm.” Bouriez v. … Count V is dismissed with prejudice.

United States v. Colon

654 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2009

United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 251 (3d Cir.2006). Furthermore, reasonable suspicion may fairly be premised on officers training and experience. United States v. Robertson, 305 F.3d 164, 167-68 (3d Cir.2002). … The Court has found, considering the four Brown factors, that the Officers had a reasonable suspicion justifying a seizure.

Keel v. Axelrod

148 F. Supp. 3d 411 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2015

Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 306 (2d Cir.2013). … See Kelly-Brown, 717 F.3d 295, 298-303 ; see also MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co. v.

WILLIAMS v. CITY OF LANCASTER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2020

Brown v. United States, No. CV 17-1551, 2019 WL 764429, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2019)(citing Briscoe v. Klaus, 538 F.3d 252, 258-59 (3d Cir. 2008). … v. Thorne, 790 F. App'x 355, 358 (3d Cir. 2019); Brown, 2019 WL 764429, at *8.

MILLER v. BROWNING

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2023

See Gannaway v. Stroumbakis, 842 F. … Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hosp., Inc., 184 F.3d 268, 277 (3d Cir. 1999); see also Webb v. Chapman, 852 F.

In Re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litigation

811 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992

This Document Relates To: Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. K. Louise JONES, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. James LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Margherita BARBETTA v. SEPTA, et al. … Mary Retta JOHNSON v. SEPTA, et al. John INGRAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. William BUTLER, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Matthew CUNNINGHAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al.

Tsimounis v. Holland

132 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Costas Tsimounis, plaintiff herein, a merchant seaman, now twenty-eight years of age, a native and citizen of Greece, first arrived in the United States at the port of Portland, Maine, in January, 1952, as a seaman on board … I find, however, that the constitutionality of these sections was expressly raised by plaintiff’s own counsel in the case of United States v.