Case law

Friedrich v. U.S. Computer Services, Inc.

833 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1993

Board of School Directors of Albert Gallatin Area School Dist., 730 F.2d 910, 912 (3d Cir.1984) (quoting Weaver v. Marine Bank, 683 F.2d 744, 746 (3d Cir.1982) and Tully v. … However, in Sanders v.

Csanadi v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUF., WHSEMEN. & HELPERS LOC. U.

463 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1978

Goclowski v. Penn Central Transp. Co., 571 F.2d 747, 757 (3d Cir. 1977); Pawlak v. … the Executive Board of the Joint Council.

Parliament Import Co. v. Gibson Wine Co., Inc.

537 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1982

Gibson relies on Honda Associates Inc. v. … Zerance v. William Harvey Research Corp., 401 F.Supp. 804 (E.D.Pa. 1975); see, Plum Tree, Inc. v. Stockment, 488 F.2d 754 (3d Cir. 1973).

Jansen v. The Theodor Heirich

13 F. Cas. 352 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1838

The libel-lants went on board the ship at Biga; their monthly, wages were fixed; they sailed for Londonderry without objection or complaint. Must we not say that they agreed to that voyage? I cannot doubt it. … As to the first, I have explained my views of the law in Ma-gee v. The Moss [Case No. 8,944]. I think the principles I adopted in that case are applicable to this, and that there is no ground for forfeiture.

Christo v. United States

83 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1949

His contention in the first cause of action is that he either sustained or aggravated a heart condition on board, as a result of respondents’ negligence. … See Mayo v. War Shipping Administration, D.C. 82 F. Supp. 61 , and cases cited therein. How long the duty continues depends upon the facts of the case.

United States ex rel. Ferenc v. Walters

367 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1973

See McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 139 , 55 S.Ct. 24 , 79 L.Ed. 238 (1934). … Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461, 1469 (1935); Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 , 53 S.Ct, 55 , 77 L.Ed. 158 (1932); see also Townsend v.

General Public Warehouse Co. v. Queen Line, Ltd.

177 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1959

At the time of this accident, there were-only ten or twelve men on board. … Cranberry Creek Coal Co. v. Red Star Towing & Transp. Co., 2 Cir., 1929, 33 F.2d 272, 274 , certiorari denied 1929, New York Marine Co. v.

Haakenson v. Parkhouse

312 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1970

Board of Educ., 373 U.S. 668, 671-674 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Kelly v. Butler County Bd. of Comm'rs, 399 F.2d 133 (C.A. 3, 1968). … Urbano v. Board of Managers of N.J. State Prisons, 415 F.2d 247 , 254 n. 20 (C.A. 3, 1969). It is the basic teaching of Railroad Commission of Texas v.

Krajci v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.

525 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1981

“Security interest” is not defined by the TILA, but the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”), pursuant to its statutory authority, has defined the'term in Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq, as follows: (gg) “Security interest … Williams v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., supra; but see Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., supra. 2.

Wernicki-Stevens v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.

641 F. Supp. 2d 418 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2009

Howard Choi, a board certified physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist, for an independent review. Dr. … .”); see also Brown v.

Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees

275 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 5, 1967

The System Board of Adjustment, of which all Division Chairmen were members, elected the General Chairman, who since 1941 has been S. V. W. Loehr. … In Russell v.

Weinstein v. Friedman

859 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 7, 1994

In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund, II, L.P., 816 F.Supp. 973, 975 (D.Del.1993); U.S. v. Brown University, 772 F.Supp. 241, 242 (E.D.Pa.1991), rev’d on other grounds, 5 F.3d 658 (3rd Cir.1993). … Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508-509 , 67 S.Ct. 839, 843 , 91 L.Ed. 1055 (1947); U.S. v. Brown University, supra, at 242-243; Leonardo Da Vinci’s Horse, Inc. v.

Chevalier v. Baird Savings Association

371 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1974

In Chavez v. … It may be that plaintiffs could challenge the failure of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board to exclude defendants from membership. Cf. Data Processing Service v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970).

HUGHSTON v. MCGEE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2023

Browne. … Hughston also claims to have informed Defendants Wieman and Browne about the inadequate recreation time on “multiple Thursday inspection days, to no [a]vail.” (Id.)

Associated Tel. Answering Exch. v. Am. Tel. & Tel.

492 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1980

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1941). … Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 , 100 S.Ct. 937 , 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980), the Court observed that there are two standards which must be met before the doctrine of Parker v. Brown applies.

City of Reading v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

19 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 13, 1937

Board of Education v. Maryland Casualty Co. (C.C.A.) 27 F.(2d) 20 ; Purdy v. Massey, 306 Pa. 288 , 159 A. 545 ; Trainor Co. v. Ætna Casualty Co., 290 U.S. 47 , 54 S.Ct. 1 , 78 L.Ed. 162 . … Board of Education v. Maryland Casualty Co., supra.

COLLINS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2020

He alleges that on December 17, 2019 he boarded a prison transport bus to go from CFCF to the Philadelphia Criminal Justice Center for a proceeding in his case. (ECF No. 5 at 3.) … .’”); Brown, 353 F.3d at 1040 (“We conclude Brown stated a claim against the five COs involved in transporting the inmates, as he alleged he asked them all to fasten his seatbelt, but they refused.”); see also Scott v.

Haines & Kibblehouse, Inc. v. Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc.

789 F. Supp. 2d 622 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 2011

Balfour cites Bethel v. McAllister Brothers, Inc., 81 F.3d 376, 381 (3d Cir.1996), Garber v. Lego, 11 F.3d 1197 , 1198 n. 1 (3d Cir.1993), and Borelli v. … Henderson v.

Weston v. City of Philadelphia

82 F. Supp. 3d 637 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2015

Board of Cnty. Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Id. at 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 215 (3d Cir.2001) (“The scope of failure to train liability is a narrow one.”).

Horn v. Peanut World Co.

837 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1993

(citing Krug v. … See Anderson v.