Case law

In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

821 F. Supp. 2d 709 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2011

V. … Needled Inc. v.

Coopersmith Bros. v. Stefko Boulevard Shopping Center, Inc.

30 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1962

Brown v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co., 189 F.2d 871 (2nd Cir. 1951). See also Moore’s Federal Practice, 2 ed., vol. 3, ¶ 15.08, pp. 828-830, and the cases cited there. … Portsmouth Baseball Corporation v. Frick, D. C., 21 F.R.D. 318 (1958).

Clemens v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey

264 F. Supp. 551 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1967

Co. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co., 128 F.2d 411 (7 Cir. 1942); Cavac Compañía v. Board for Val. of German Bonds, 189 F.Supp. 205 (S.D.N.Y.1960); American Locomotive Co. v. … jurisdiction of the Board but commented upon the wisdom of Congress in providing for such a Board. ( 215 F.Supp. 229, at p. 237 .)

United States v. Teti

422 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1976

Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603 , 95 S.Ct. *137 2254, 2261, 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (original emphasis). … The weapons are: (1) a Smith and Wesson .38 caliber revolver; (2) a Smith and Wesson .357 caliber revolver; (3) a Browning 9-mm, semi-automatic pistol; (4) a Browning .380 caliber, semi-automatic pistol; and (5) a sawed-off

Kelsey v. Philadelphia Local 8, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees

294 F. Supp. 1368 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1968

“The Trial Board in the instant case consisted of union officials, not judges. … See United States v. Dutsch, 357 F.2d 331 (4th Cir., 1966); United States v. Daulong, 60 F.Supp. 235 (W.D.Pa., 1965) ; United States v. Charlick, 26 F. Supp. 203 (E.D.Pa., 1934) and Cote v.

FIDELITY FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. Felicetti

830 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1993

Pepper v. … Capitol Bus Co. v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc., 478 F.2d 556, 560 (3d Cir.1973); Kay v.

Phillips v. Ward

415 F. Supp. 976 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1976

Police Officer Robert Horgan testified that he frequently saw Gary Phillips in the company of Ricky Brown, Allen Brown, James O’Brien, Thomas O’Brien, Joseph Ball and Louis Moon-blatt. … See Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 485 F.2d 132, 143 (3d Cir. 1973); Longden v. Conestoga Transportation Co., 313 Pa. 561 , 169 A. 884 (1934); Gordon v. Trovato, 234 Pa.Super. 279 , 338 A.2d 653 (1975).

Samoff v. Building Trades Council

350 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1972

E.g., Samoff for and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. Teamsters Local 115, 338 F.Supp. 856 (E.D.Pa.1972); Samoff for and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. … Terminal Freight Cooperative Assoc. v. N. L. R. B., 447 F.2d 1099, 1102 (3rd Cir. 1971); Schauffler for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. Local 1291, Int’l.

Stone v. Bear, Stearns & Co.

872 F. Supp. 2d 435 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2012

Corp., 476 F.3d 278, 281-83 (5th Cir.2007) (holding that Justice WTiite’s concurrence controls and endorsing a practically-oriented “reasonable impression of bias” standard), with Crow Constr. v. Jeffrey M. Brown Assoc. … Brown 1992 Irrevocable Trust v. Peabody Coal Co., No. 99-3322, 2000 WL 178554 , at *6 (6th Cir.

Pike v. United States Postal Service

886 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1995

See, e.g., Wright v. United States Postal Serv., 29 F.3d 1426, 1430 (9th Cir.1994) (holding that CDA did not preempt PRA’s jurisdictional grant codified at 39 U.S.C. § 409 (a)); Marine Coatings v. … See Franchise Tax Bd. v.

Hines v. Bristol City Line (Canada) Ltd.

301 F. Supp. 1394 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1969

A. v. Frota Nacional de Petroleiros, 348 F.2d 33 (3rd Cir.1965); S. Riggi & Son Construction Corp. v. Frouge Construction Co., 345 F.2d 654 (3rd Cir.1965); Payne v. S. S. … See Schlichter v. Port Arthur Towing Co., supra; Dessi v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 251 F.2d 149 (3rd Cir.1958); Haldeman v. Bell Telephone Co., 387 F. 2d 557 (3rd Cir.1968).

STAGLIANO v. COLL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2022

Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403, (1997)) (emphasis in original). … Min v. Morris, 737 F. Supp. 2d 332, 339 (E.D. Pa. 2010) (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2001)).

Jones v. Countywide Home Loans, Inc. (In re Jones)

331 B.R. 204 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 2005

In re Tops Appliance City, Inc., 372 F.3d 510 , 513 (3rd Cir.2004); Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3rd Cir.1988). … In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 567 (3rd Cir.1991). III. DISCUSSION The Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania properly granted summary judgment.

Lee v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

418 F. Supp. 2d 675 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2005

Lake v. … See Bottoms v. Southeastern Pa. Trans.

Graff v. Smith

100 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1951

Humes v. United States, 1928, 276 U.S. 487, 494 , 48 S.Ct. 347 , 72 L.Ed. 667 ; Newton Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 1947, 160 F.2d 175, 180-181 ; Helvering v. … Pennsylvania Company for Insurances, etc. v. Brown, D.C.E.D.Pa.1933, 6 F.Supp. 582 , affirmed 3 Cir., 70 F.2d 269 .

Roberts v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

497 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1979

Roberts v. Lehigh & New England Railway Co., 211 F.Supp. 379 (E.D.Pa.1962), aff’d, 323 F.2d 219 (3d Cir. 1963). In Clemens v. … In Antonioli v.

Reiss v. Brotherhood of Railway & Airline Clerks

629 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1986

Under Franchise Tax Board v. … . § 185 , not only because the extent of federal primacy is well established, see Hillard v. Dobelman, 774 F.2d 886, 887 (8th Cir.1985); Mitchell v.

Skrocki v. Caltabiano

505 F. Supp. 916 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1981

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The sufficiency of the claim of entitlement must be decided by reference to state law. Bishop v. … In Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, the Supreme Court held that the concept of liberty did not include the non-retention of an untenured college instructor. In Bishop v.

In Re U.S. Bioscience Securities Litigation

806 F. Supp. 1197 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1992

See, e.g., Blake v. Dierdorff, 856 F.2d 1365, 1369 (9th Cir.1988); Kramer v. … at board meetings and so forth.”

United States v. Cohen

444 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1978

The first thirteen counts of the indictment charge Cohen, attorney for the School Board, and Yannessa, a School Board member, with violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § … United States v.