Case law

Stager v. Ridge Ave. Pass. Ry. Co.

119 Pa. 70 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1888

from the attempt: Johnson v. … Co. v. Aspell, 23 Pa. 147 , and McClintock v. R. R. Co., 20 W.

Atherholt v. William Stoddart Co.

286 Pa. 278 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1926

As was said in Tarr v. … Excelsior Express Co., 259 Pa. 393 ; Crouse v. Lubin, 260 Pa. 329, 332 ; Cayll v. Gas & Elec. Co., supra, 179 N. W. 773 .

Elliott v. Lindquist

356 Pa. 385 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1947

The Secretary of the Board of Directors shall notify all stockholders in writing of the proposed sale, or sale of any stock of said company,- at least twenty (20) days prior to any regular or special meeting of the Board … Ass’n. v. Guice, 27 Ala. App. 7, 165 So. 864 ; Bowler v. American Box Strap Co., 49 N. Y. S. 153; Soverign Camp W. O. W. v. Sabalza (Tex.) 93 S. W. 2d 177 ; Modern Woodmen v. Harper (Tex.) 94 S. W. 2d 157 ; Matthews v.

Vasey v. McLean

310 Pa. 282 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1933

, a cross support known as a ledger board, broke, precipitating plaintiff to the ground, his fall resulting in a fractured heel bone and a wrenched back. … Ball Engine Co., 176 Pa. 459, 464 ; see also Hartz v. Schafer, 303 Pa. 449, 452 . The order and judgment of the court below are affirmed.

Stryjewski v. Local Union No. 830

426 Pa. 512 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1967

Labor Relations Board v. Butz, 411 Pa. 360, 365-370 , 192 A. 2d 707 (1963). … Rather, we believe that the party seeking relief need only demonstrate, on the basis of published regulations and decisions of the board, that the case is one which the board will decline to hear.” 10 We believe that, until

In re Anonymous No. 73 D.B. 81

28 Pa. D. & C.3d 40 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1983

DISCUSSION The hearing committee duly made its report to the board, following which this board, after an ex *43 tensive and complete review of the entire record in this matter, including the report, findings and recommendation … V.

Pennsylvania State Education Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Department of Community & Economic Development, Office of Open Records

606 Pa. 638 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 2010

In re Anonymous No. 23 D.B. 80

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 452 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 27, 1981

V. DISCUSSION The panel had no difficulty in accepting the following report of the hearing committee except as to the appropriate discipline in relation to the aforementioned detailed facts. … The Disciplinary Board adopts the hearing board’s findings of fact and conclusion of law.

Township of Eldred v. County of Monroe

330 Pa. Super. 74 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1984

. § 704(a); Pa.R.A.P. 741(a); see Jost v. Phoenixville Area School District, 267 Pa.Super. 461 , 465 n. 1, 406 A.2d 1133 , 1135 n. 1 (1979); see also Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Sensi, 287 Pa.Super. 452 at 454 , 430 A.2d 691 at 692 (1981). It is also true here that: As in Commonwealth v.

Szabo, S. v. PennDOT, Aplt.

202 A.3d 52 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2019

A hearing before the board of viewers was scheduled for May 21, 2015. … V.

Hemphill v. Chenie

6 Watts & Serg. 62 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1843

An offer to deliver, as is held in Ostrander v. Brown, ( 15 Johns. 42 ), does not relieve him from the care and custody of goods which he has under his charge.

Pearlman v. Pittsburgh

304 Pa. 24 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1931

See Carroll v. Phila., 183 Pa. 55 . The term ‘lowest bidder’ necessarily implies that there must be a common standard open to all: Page v. King et al., 285 Pa. 153 ; Mazet v. Pittsburgh, 137 Pa. 548 . … Co. v. Allentown, 153 Pa. 319 .

Ross v. Shawmut Development Corp.

460 Pa. 328 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1975

Brown, 430 Pa. 401, 403-05 , 243 A.2d 444, 446-47 (1968); Suchan v. Swope, 357 Pa. 16, 19-21 , 53 A.2d 116, 118-19 (1947); cf. Field v. … Friedman, Friedman on Leases, § 15.1, at 617 (1974), or whether that claim was properly presented, see Brown v. Hahn, 419 Pa. 42, 45-50 , 213 A.2d 342 , 344-46 *335 (1965); Goldman v.

Monongahela Navigation Co. v. C. Jutte & Co.

194 Pa. 56 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1899

Justice Brown, On the argument of the appeal in this case our attention was called to some alleged difference between it and the other cases which were tried with it in the court below, but we feel that what we have said … in Monongahela Navigation Company v.

Bowers's Appeal

84 Pa. 311 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 28, 1877

Smith 58; Brown’s Appeal, 18 Id. 53. It by no means follows, however, that because the power exists, it is to be exercised in all cases. It is a matter that rests in the sound discretion of the Orphans’ Court. … As a general rule this court will not review an exercise of discretion unless the record shows palpable and gross abuse: North Pennsyl *313 vania Railroad Co. v. Davis, 2 Casey 238 ; Hudson’s Appeal, 3 Id. 47 ; Neil v.

Commonwealth v. Weir, C., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2020

a government agency in addition to or in place of the board. … of the board.

Shankey v. STAISEY

436 Pa. 65 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1969

In Kerns v. … As to the proper construction of the former, see Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County v. Superior Court, 4 Ariz.

Yocum's Estate

242 Pa. 82 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1913

Justice Brown, On June 2,1875, Jesse Yocum executed his bond, with a warrant of attorney attached, for $2,000, payable one year after date, to Stephen Coates, as trustee for his wife, Ann Yocum. … Brown, co-executor with Mrs. Yocum, having died.

Mallon v. Township of Upper Moreland

461 Pa. 241 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

In Gardner v. … See also Donnon v. Downingtown Civil Serv. Comm., 3 Pa.Cmwlth. 366 , 283 A.2d 92 (1971). JONES, C. J., and POMEROY, J., join in this opinion.

Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Pet: Sponenberg

190 A.3d 593 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2018

WEBBER : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. … : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : MONTOUR TOWNSHIP ZONING : HEARING BOARD AND SCOTT : SPONENBERG :