Opinion

Township of Eldred v. County of Monroe

  • 330 Pa. Super. 74
  • 478 A.2d 1357
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5468
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 20, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Brosky
On the bench
Brosky, Wieand, McEwen
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 80.5%

noting the Commonwealth Court’s greater expertise in the subject matter and emphasizing that transfer was preferable to “prevent unnecessary confusion and lack of coordination” because the Commonwealth Court would “be the forum for similar cases in this area of the law”

How later courts described this case

  • noting the Commonwealth Court’s greater expertise in the subject matter and emphasizing that transfer was preferable to “prevent unnecessary confusion and lack of coordination” because the Commonwealth Court would “be the forum for similar cases in this area of the law”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from the dismissal of appellant’s suit in equity, challenging a settlement in a taxpayer’s suit. This matter comes within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court.

(a) ... the Commonwealth Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas in the following cases: ... (4) Local government civil and criminal matters. — (i) ... where is drawn in question the application, interpretation or enforcement of any: ... (b) ... local ordinance or resolution.

42 Pa.C.S. § 762.

A case involving, as this one does, a county tax comes within the language “local ordinance or resolution.” See

In re Appeal of Pennsylvania Eastern Seal Society from Real Estate Taxation Assessment,

67 Pa.Cmwlth. 94 , 445 A.2d 1369 (1982). Thus, this case comes within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court.

We note that:

However, because appellee failed to object to this court’s lack of jurisdiction, our jurisdiction has been perfected,

*76

and we have discretion either to decide the case on the merits or transfer it to Commonwealth Court. 42 Pa.C.S. § 704(a); Pa.R.A.P. 741(a);

see Jost v. Phoenixville Area School District,

267 Pa.Super. 461 , 465 n. 1, 406 A.2d 1133 , 1135 n. 1 (1979);

see also Commonwealth v. Meyer,

488 Pa. 297 , 304-05 n. 9, 412 A.2d 517 , 520 n. 9 (1980).

Commonwealth v. Sensi,

287 Pa.Super. 452 at 454 , 430 A.2d 691 at 692 (1981).

It is also true here that:

As in

Commonwealth v. Sensi, supra,

we believe the Commonwealth Court’s greater expertise in the issues raised here make transfer to that court appropriate. Moreover, transfer of this case will prevent unnecessary-confusion and lack of coordination, since Commonwealth Court will be the forum for similar cases in this ... area of the law ...

Osser v. City of Philadelphia,

295 Pa.Super. 447 at 449 , 441 A.2d 1317 at 1318 (1982).

Accordingly, this appeal is transferred to the Commonwealth Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.