Opinion

Berner,et al v. Montour ZHB,et al Pet: Sponenberg

  • 190 A.3d 593
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 1, 2018
Status
Published
On the bench
Per Curiam
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.0%

The opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RUSSELL BERNER AND DONNA : No. 84 MAL 2018

BERNER, KENDALL DOBBINS, ROBERT :

D. CLARK AND ROBERT W. WEBBER :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

v. : the Order of the Commonwealth Court

:

MONTOUR TOWNSHIP ZONING :

HEARING BOARD AND SCOTT :

SPONENBERG :

:

PETITION OF: SCOTT SPONENBERG :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED to Petitioner’s first issue is stated as follows:

(1) Whether the Commonwealth Court erred by holding that the Nutrient

Management Act (“NMA”), 3 P.S., §519, only preempts local ordinances as

applied to farms that have an approved nutrient management plan and that

small farms that are not required to submit nutrient management plans can

be subjected to more stringent regulation than larger more intensive

agricultural operations that are required to obtain approval of a nutrient

management plan under the Nutrient Management Act.

Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.

The ancillary applications for Leave to File Amicus Briefs filed by the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of Attorney General, the Pennsylvania Farm

Bureau and the PennAg Industries Association are DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.