Case law

Citizens for Responsible Government v. County Board of Elections

472 Pa. 199 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1977

Chambers v. McKee

185 Pa. 105 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1898

Browne was concerned, fixed under the influence of this mistake at much less than it should have been, it was no longer binding upon them. … The board of directors of the Chambers & McKee Glass Company, with full notice of the mistake of Browne, and against the protest of one or more of its members, resolved to settle the claim of the corporation they represented

P & R Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

543 Pa. 646 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1996

Heraeus Electro Nite Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

551 Pa. 431 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1998

A. Blumberg & Son, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

416 Pa. 557 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1965

Opinion Per Curiam, Neighbors were aggrieved by an Order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment which was affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas. This Order granted a permit in 1958 for a junk yard.

Theresa Friedman & Sons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

398 Pa. 494 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1960

Here, acting only on the record established by the zoning board, the court below has substituted its own views for those of the zoning board *496 which is entrusted with the responsibility to make findings of fact. … Drawing inferences of this nature is the function of the zoning board, committed thereto because of their peculiar expertise. I would affirm the decision of the board and reverse the court below.

Slippery Rock Area School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

603 Pa. 374 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2009

LiVorio appealed to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR). The UCBR reversed the referee’s decision in October 2007. … See Bailey v.

Borings, Soil & Testing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

540 Pa. 534 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1995

Hainsey v. Com. Pa. Liquor Control Bd.

529 Pa. 286 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1992

In Commonwealth v. Brown, 485 Pa. 368 , 402 A.2d 1007 (1979), we adopted the reasoning of the Superior Court in Commonwealth v. … Upon consideration of the licensees’ request for a continuance, the Board denied the request. Thereafter counsel for the Board moved and granted his own motion for continuance. Although, Commonwealth v.

Green Tree Borough v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessments

446 Pa. 309 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1971

Hooper v. Zoning Hearing Board of West Brandywine Township

536 Pa. 548 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1994

Life Service Systems v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

536 Pa. 433 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1994

Melhorn v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

908 A.2d 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 2006

See McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, 582 Pa. 440 , 872 A.2d 1127 (2005); Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 488 Pa. 397 , 412 A.2d 568 (1980); 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760.

P & R Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

674 A.2d 223 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1996

Stewart Honeybee Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & Revenue

525 Pa. 222 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1990

of Finance and Revenue. *224 Our opinion in Ski Roundtop v. … Compare Commonwealth v.

Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

504 Pa. 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 1984

The Commonwealth Court cited their decision in Ertz v. … Anderson v. Schroeder Monumental Works, 159 Pa.Superior 620, 625, 49 A.2d 631, 634 (1946). As we stated in McIntyre v.

Bosacco v. Redevelopment Authority

500 Pa. 519 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1983

Railroad Co. v. Harris, 124 Pa. 215 , 16 A. 838 (1889); See Brown v. Corey and Peterson, 43 Pa. 495 (1863). That principle followed from this Court’s holding in Brown that: [I]f one party appeals the other need not. … The Farrington court held the legislature in passing the Eminent Domain Code, supra, repealed the rule of Brown v. Corey and Peterson by failing to expressly codify it.

Commonwealth ex rel. Zimmerman v. Officers & Employees Retirement Board

502 Pa. 77 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 1983

Hamm v. Board of Education for the School District

496 Pa. 397 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1981

Springdale Township v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment

524 Pa. 247 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1990