Opinion

P & R Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

  • 543 Pa. 646
  • 674 A.2d 223
  • 1996 Pa. LEXIS 622
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 2, 1996
Status
Published
On the bench
Consideration, Matter, Newman
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.4%

stating that the gross method is “preferred”

How later courts described this case

  • stating that the gross method is “preferred”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*647

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW this 2nd day of April, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to whether the gross or net methodology is to be utilized in determining an employers’/insurers’ subrogation rights and liabilities where a claimant recovers in a third-party tort action.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.