Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.70s
Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
362 Pa. 342 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1949
, a board created pursuant to section 203, 43 PS 763. … A copy of such appeal petition shall be served upon a member or agent of the board, and sufficient additional copies shall be left with the board to enable the board to furnish a copy to every party in interest in the proceeding
Cited 26 timesPublishedGladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
479 Pa. 324 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1978
This is an appeal from the Commonwealth Court’s reversal of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Board) grant of unemployment compensation benefits to David A. … Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 160 Pa.Super. 379 , 51 A.2d 518 (1947); Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa.Super. 315 , 31 A.2d 740 (1943); Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedSteere's Dairy, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
398 Pa. 551 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1960
The subject matter is an award of unemployment compensation made by the Board of Review to a discharged employee of the plaintiff company. … [and that] any decision of the board . . . shall nevertheless be subject to appeal to the Superior Court after the same has become final.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedFriendship Preservation Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
906 A.2d 1194 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublishedBixler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
619 Pa. 482 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013
AND NOW, this 19th day of April 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Commonwealth Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Diehl v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDonnelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
619 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013
AND NOW, this 19th day of April 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Commonwealth Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Diehl v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKovalev, S. v. Board of Rev. of Taxes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2020
: Superior Court at No. 2900 EDA : 2019 entered on December 2, 2019, : quashing the Order of the BOARD … See Grant v. Blaine, 868 A.2d 400, 402 (Pa. 2005) (holding that “an order denying in forma pauperis status is a final, appealable order”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKovalev, S. v. Board of Rev. of Taxes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 2020
: Superior Court at No. 2899 EDA : 2019 entered on December 3, 2019, : quashing the Order of the BOARD … See Grant v. Blaine, 868 A.2d 400, 402 (Pa. 2005) (holding that “an order denying in forma pauperis status is a final, appealable order”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
530 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1992
[Kusenko v. Republic Steel Corp., 506 Pa. 104 , 484 A.2d 374 (1984); McCloskey v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 501 Pa. 93 , 460 A.2d 237 (1983)].
Cited 0 timesPublishedBily v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review
353 Pa. 49 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1945
McNevin, 74 Cal. 250 , 14 P. 369 , 15 P. 773 ; Ladd v. Stevenson, 112 N. Y. 325 , 19 N. E. 842 ; Mooney v. New York Elevated R. R. Co., 163 N. Y. 242 , 57 N. E. 496 ; Walker v. Sanders, 103 Minn. 124 , 114 N. … Gaines v. Clark, 275 F. 1017, 1019 ; Northampton Trust Co., Trustee, v. Northampton Traction Co., 270 Pa. 199, 205 , 112 A. 871, 872 ; Valmont Developing Co. v. Rosser, 297 Pa. 140, 149, 150 , 146 A. 557, 560, 561 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedMalt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
593 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2007
Cited 0 timesPublishedMalt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
593 Pa. 413 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2007
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarvey v. Allegheny County Retirement Board
400 Pa. 401 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1960
See Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement Board, 392 Pa. 421 , 141 A. 2d 197 (1958). … Accordingly, the order of the court below directing the Retirement Board of Allegheny County ■to pay Harvey the monies claimed by him as a retired county employee was improperly entered.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMALT BEVERAGES DISTRIBUTION ASSOCIATION v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
603 Pa. 71 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2009
The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is: Did the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board improperly apply its “interior connection” and “other business” rules so as to circumvent the fundamental Liquor Code rules establishing the
Cited 0 timesPublishedDehoff v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
619 Pa. 479 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2013
AND NOW, this 19th day of April 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Commonwealth Court’s decision is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Diehl v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSociety Hill Civic Association v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
593 Pa. 323 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2007
Cited 0 timesPublishedJ.G. Furniture Division/Burlington v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
585 Pa. 473 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2005
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlpha Club of West Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
363 Pa. 53 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1949
This affords plaintiff a full, complete and adequate remedy at lav/: O’Donnell v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 351 Pa. 129 .” … Chidsey v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedHertz-Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
546 Pa. 257 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1996
See Hertz Penske Truck Leasing Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 168 Pa.Cmwlth. 657 , 651 A.2d 1145 (1995). … In Pieper v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedMorgo v. State Employees Retirement Board
533 Pa. 55 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1993
The Order of the Commonwealth Court entered on April 10, 1992 at No. 754 C.D.1991 is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the State Employees’ Retirement Board for determination of Petitioner’s pension benefits. … See Glancey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Employees Retirement Board, 530 Pa. 481 , 610 A.2d 15 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna