Opinion

Bell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

  • 530 Pa. 266
  • 608 A.2d 493
  • 1992 Pa. LEXIS 368
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 16, 1992
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW this 16th day of June, 1992, the Application for Reargument is granted and the case is remanded to the referee for the presentation of evidence under the Kusenko/McCloskey standard. [Kusenko v. Republic Steel Corp., 506 Pa. 104 , 484 A.2d 374 (1984); McCloskey v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 501 Pa. 93 , 460 A.2d 237 (1983)].

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.