Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

1.85s

  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017

    The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017

    The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    570 Pa. 595 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2002

    See Upper *596 Makefield Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 562 Pa. 113 , 753 A.2d 803 (2000). Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Streck v. Lower Macungie Township Board of Commissioners

    621 Pa. 110 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 2013

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    850 A.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 2004

    AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, see Caso v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Talkish v. Zoning Hearing Board

    562 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2000

    ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue: Whether this Court’s holding in Hertzberg v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 554 Pa. 249 , 721 A.2d 43 (1998), which applied a relaxed evidentiary standard for dimensional variances, overrules the requirement that an applicant for a variance present

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    842 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2003

    See Daniels v. WCAB, 828 A.2d 1043 (Pa.2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    851 A.2d 832 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2004

    . § 834 and Daniels v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Tristate Transport), 574 Pa.61, 828 A.2d 1043 (2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brady v. Commonwealth State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

    506 Pa. 83 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1984

    Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 503 Pa. 392 , 469 A.2d 996 (1983), Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 503 Pa. 399 , 469 A.2d 1000 (1983), O’Brien v. … Commonwealth State Employees’ Retirement System, 503 Pa. 414 , 469 A.2d 1008 (1983), and Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. Lindberg, 503 Pa. 423 , 469 A.2d 1012 (1983).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Citadel Development Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

    574 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2003

    Hydrusko [v. County of Monroe], 699 A.2d [828,] 831 [(Pa.Cmwlth.1997), appeal denied, 550 Pa. 694 , 704 A.2d 1383 (Pa.1997)]; 1 Pa.C.S. § 1928(b)(5). … . *91 Board of Assessment Appeals of Erie County v. Citadel Development Company, No. 2065 C.D. 1999, unpublished memorandum at 5-7, 751 A.2d 1272 (Pa.Cmwlth. filed April 3, 2000).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Borough of Youngwood v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board

    596 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 2008

    Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the decision of the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board, which held that [Petitioner’s] 2005 Street Resurfacing Projeet[,] which included milling and road resurfacing

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sharpe v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017

    this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26, 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Easley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    169 A.3d 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017

    this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation *589 and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26,2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth, Office of Administration v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    591 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2007

    In Pennsylvania in 2002, the Board formally adopted the National Labor Relations Board’s approach to employee choice of representative for purposes of Weingar-ten in Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass’n. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 , 95 S.Ct. 959 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975). .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Coventry Hills, Inc. v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board

    437 Pa. 259 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970

    For example, one year after Price we decided Tax Review Board v. … Sun Oil Co. v. Tax Review Board, 417 Pa. 443 , 207 A. 2d 855 (1965) (upholding mercantile tax applied to dividend income from common stock).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • East Torresdale Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    508 Pa. 614 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1985

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Chinese Gourmet, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    533 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1993

    Chinese Gourmet again appealed and the common pleas court vacated the board’s order and directed the board to grant the transfer. The board appealed and Commonwealth Court reversed. … If the Board’s decision was predicated on Section 4-437 of the Liquor Code, the Board should similarly specify and explain.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Erie Bolt Corporation v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ELDERKIN)

    562 Pa. 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2000

    The order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed based upon the decision in Davis v. Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board (Borough of Swarthmore), 561 Pa. 462 , 751 A.2d 168 (2000).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Levine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    798 A.2d 1273 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2002

    2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to consider whether Claimant’s claim petition was timely filed based on this Court’s decision in Schreffler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    829 A.2d 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2003

    It is further ordered that the matter be CONSOLIDATED with Colpetzer v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Standard Steel), 802 A.2d 1233 (Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.