Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.85s
Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017
The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
169 A.3d 578 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2017
The Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration of its decision in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
570 Pa. 595 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2002
See Upper *596 Makefield Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 562 Pa. 113 , 753 A.2d 803 (2000). Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.
Cited 8 timesPublishedStreck v. Lower Macungie Township Board of Commissioners
621 Pa. 110 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
850 A.2d 617 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 2004
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, see Caso v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTalkish v. Zoning Hearing Board
562 Pa. 631 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2000
ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue: Whether this Court’s holding in Hertzberg v. … Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 554 Pa. 249 , 721 A.2d 43 (1998), which applied a relaxed evidentiary standard for dimensional variances, overrules the requirement that an applicant for a variance present
Cited 0 timesPublishedRoss v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
842 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 2003
See Daniels v. WCAB, 828 A.2d 1043 (Pa.2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBarnes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
851 A.2d 832 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2004
. § 834 and Daniels v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Tristate Transport), 574 Pa.61, 828 A.2d 1043 (2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrady v. Commonwealth State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
506 Pa. 83 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1984
Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 503 Pa. 392 , 469 A.2d 996 (1983), Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 503 Pa. 399 , 469 A.2d 1000 (1983), O’Brien v. … Commonwealth State Employees’ Retirement System, 503 Pa. 414 , 469 A.2d 1008 (1983), and Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. Lindberg, 503 Pa. 423 , 469 A.2d 1012 (1983).
Cited 7 timesPublishedCitadel Development Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals
574 Pa. 84 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 2003
Hydrusko [v. County of Monroe], 699 A.2d [828,] 831 [(Pa.Cmwlth.1997), appeal denied, 550 Pa. 694 , 704 A.2d 1383 (Pa.1997)]; 1 Pa.C.S. § 1928(b)(5). … . *91 Board of Assessment Appeals of Erie County v. Citadel Development Company, No. 2065 C.D. 1999, unpublished memorandum at 5-7, 751 A.2d 1272 (Pa.Cmwlth. filed April 3, 2000).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBorough of Youngwood v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board
596 Pa. 266 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 29, 2008
Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in affirming the decision of the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals Board, which held that [Petitioner’s] 2005 Street Resurfacing Projeet[,] which included milling and road resurfacing
Cited 1 timesPublishedSharpe v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
169 A.3d 589 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017
this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26, 2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEasley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
169 A.3d 588 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 2017
this 21st day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for reconsideration in light of Pittman v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation *589 and Parole, 159 A.3d 466 , 2017 WL 1489047 (Pa. filed April 26,2017).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommonwealth, Office of Administration v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
591 Pa. 176 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2007
In Pennsylvania in 2002, the Board formally adopted the National Labor Relations Board’s approach to employee choice of representative for purposes of Weingar-ten in Pennsylvania State Corrections Officers Ass’n. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 , 95 S.Ct. 959 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975). .
Cited 37 timesPublishedCoventry Hills, Inc. v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board
437 Pa. 259 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1970
For example, one year after Price we decided Tax Review Board v. … Sun Oil Co. v. Tax Review Board, 417 Pa. 443 , 207 A. 2d 855 (1965) (upholding mercantile tax applied to dividend income from common stock).
Cited 5 timesPublishedEast Torresdale Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
508 Pa. 614 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1985
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textChinese Gourmet, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
533 Pa. 129 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1993
Chinese Gourmet again appealed and the common pleas court vacated the board’s order and directed the board to grant the transfer. The board appealed and Commonwealth Court reversed. … If the Board’s decision was predicated on Section 4-437 of the Liquor Code, the Board should similarly specify and explain.
Cited 3 timesPublishedErie Bolt Corporation v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ELDERKIN)
562 Pa. 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2000
The order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed based upon the decision in Davis v. Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board (Borough of Swarthmore), 561 Pa. 462 , 751 A.2d 168 (2000).
Cited 6 timesPublishedLevine v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
798 A.2d 1273 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2002
2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted and the case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Judge to consider whether Claimant’s claim petition was timely filed based on this Court’s decision in Schreffler v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZerby v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
829 A.2d 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2003
It is further ordered that the matter be CONSOLIDATED with Colpetzer v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Standard Steel), 802 A.2d 1233 (Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna