Opinion

Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

  • 570 Pa. 595
  • 810 A.2d 1240
  • 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2633
  • 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2427
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 25, 2002
Status
Published
On the bench
Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 69.8%

affirming a Commonwealth Court decision holding that a bargaining unit could not challenge as an unfair labor practice the unilateral termination of an asserted term and condition of employment for probationary officers

How later courts described this case

  • affirming a Commonwealth Court decision holding that a bargaining unit could not challenge as an unfair labor practice the unilateral termination of an asserted term and condition of employment for probationary officers
  • suggesting that Act 111's deferential standard should apply only to interest arbitration

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November 2002, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. See Upper *596 Makefield Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 562 Pa. 113 , 753 A.2d 803 (2000).

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.