Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Marshall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
542 Pa. 463 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedTruitt v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
509 Pa. 628 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1986
Cited 2 timesPublishedGordon Lubricating Co. v. Board of Property Assessment
418 Pa. 625 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1965
Cited 5 timesPublishedAshby v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
669 A.2d 876 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedAshby v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
543 Pa. 4 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcIlvaine Trucking, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
570 Pa. 662 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 2002
(the “Board”) affirmed. … Corp. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMoss v. Commonwealth, Penna. Board of Probation & Parole
632 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedMoss v. Commonwealth, Penna. Board of Probation & Parole
120 A.3d 296 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublishedBachman v. Zoning Hearing Board of Bern Township
508 Pa. 180 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1985
See Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 435 Pa. 99 , 255 *185 A.2d 506 (1969) and Mack Zoning Appeal, 384 Pa. 586 , 122 A.2d 48 (1956). In this case the zoning board rejected Mr. … See also, Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing Board of Schuylkill Township, 49 Pa.Cmwlth. 397 , 412 A.2d 169 (1980). .
Cited 12 timesPublishedRiley v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
622 Pa. 175 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcNeill v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
510 Pa. 574 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 1986
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), appellee herein, erred in remanding this case for a second hearing before a referee, per the request of the employer, where … .” 1 Board Hearing Order dated October 18, 1983, Original Record at Item 11.
Cited 23 timesPublishedFeigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
638 A.2d 193 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 1994
Cited 0 timesPublishedBethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
524 Pa. 235 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1990
James v. SEPTA, 505 Pa. 137 , 477 A.2d 1302 (1984). … Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 497 Pa. 115 , 439 A.2d 627 (1981). In exercising any discretion the Board must do so keeping in mind the Act’s purpose. As we stated in Pa.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAlmusa, O., Aplt. v. State Board of Medicine
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2025
Commonwealth v. Giulian, 141 A.3d 1262, 1266 (Pa. 2016). Act 53 redefined how medical licensing boards consider certain criminal offenses. … Commonwealth v. Humphrey, 283 A.3d 275, 289 (Pa. 2022).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTaffinger v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
533 Pa. 64 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1993
Cited 0 timesPublishedEaster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
536 Pa. 447 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1994
Cited 0 timesPublishedO'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
629 Pa. 505 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2014
Cozen O’Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics, 71 A.3d 407 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2013). … United States v. Crop Growers Corporation, 954 F.
Cited 2 timesPublishedO'Connor v. City of Philadelphia Board of Ethics
608 Pa. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2011
Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. … The Firm points out that in our decision in Shaulis v. Pa.
Cited 8 timesPublishedJones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
502 Pa. 473 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1983
Cited 0 timesPublishedWeaver v. Consumers' Box Board & Paper Co.
246 Pa. 438 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1914
Assuming the fact that no demand had been made, it is conceded that the case is governed by that of Phillips v. Allegheny Car & Transp. Company, 82 Pa. 368 , on which the learned trial judge rested his conclusion.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna