Opinion

Feigley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

638 A.2d 193

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Feb 23, 1994
Status: Published
On the bench: Docket, Due, Larsen, Montemuro, Pursuant, See, Unavailability
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 1994, the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pau-peris is granted.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied. Insofar as the Petition for Review filed in the Commonwealth Court contained counts addressed to that court’s original jurisdiction, the Court has considered the Petitioner’s arguments as on direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a). There being no basis for ordering the relief requested, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.