Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
1.40s
Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation v. Shea
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 2024
Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965)) (first alteration in original). … Watersheds Project v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2025
There, the court found the plaintiffs’ comparison of a “licensed and accredited therapeutic boarding school that provides residential treatment for girls” to “sub- acute inpatient treatment settings such as skilled nursing … See Paulsen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAdidas-America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.
546 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 22, 2008
See adidas v. … See Johannsen v. Brown, 797 F.Supp. 835, 839-40 (D.Or.1992) (citing Unlimited Screw Prods., Inc. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Oct 21, 2025
(citing Bravo v. … The second method entails “mak[ing] across-the-board percentage cuts either in the number of hours claimed or in the final lodestar figure as a practical means of trimming the fat from a [massive] fee application.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownEstate of William B Hanington v. Multnomah County
District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 23, 2022
Gordon v. … See, e.g., Est. of Brown v. Lambert, 478 F. Supp. 3d 1006, 1022 (S.D. Cal. 2020); Morales v. City of Delano, 852 F. Supp. 2d 1253, 1274 (E.D. Cal. 2012); Cosby v. City of Oakland, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJ.N. v. Oregon Department of Education
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 5, 2021
Rita S. v. Stanislaus Cty. … Sueoka v. U.S., 101 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jan 6, 2022
Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000). … Deere v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Apr 24, 2025
The ASQ in the Eugene sustained-yield unit was set at 53 million board feet. AR 7486-87. … Anderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 17, 2022
See Daubert v. … Pitts, 653 F.3d at 1090; see also Cnty. v. Riverside v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownA.B. v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 8, 2020
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 317). … See Noble v. Weinstein, 335 F. Supp. 3d 504, 515–17 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (citing Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 65 (1968)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBerlant v. US Election Assistance Commission
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 2, 2024
Dep't of State v. … Plaintiff argues that a better search would have included the following search terms: "app, VVSG 1.1, agreement, conditions, practices, board, address, sharehold, insurer, insurance, org AND chart, brochure, annual report
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 2024
Cobb felt the question was insulting and embarrassing because he then dyed his gray hair brown. Mahoney’s questions typically occurred in a conference room or out of earshot of others. … See Nidds v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAlvarez v. University of Oregon
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 25, 2020
The prohibition is aimed at the legislative power of the State, and not at the… acts of administrative or executive boards or officers, or the doings of corporations or individuals.” New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. … Karim-Panahi v. L.A. Police Dep’t, 839 F.2d 621, 626 (9th Cir. 1988); see also Sanchez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCovelli v. Avamere Home Health Care, LLC
District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 25, 2021
and business offices for both corporations, the severe undercapitalization of the subsidiary’ and the ‘failure to observe such basic corporate formalities as keeping separate books and holding separate shareholder and board … .”); accord Torres-Negron v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMills v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 4, 2024
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). Instead, “the ALJ must specifically identify the testimony she or he finds not to be credible and must explain what evidence undermines the testimony.” … Nguyen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnigestion Holding, S.A. v. UPM Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2019
A SIM card acts as a small circuit board. When the card is placed inside a cellular telephone, the card identifies the device as associated with an individual customer’s unique telephone number and account. … See Armada (Singapore) PTE Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMenchu v. Multnomah County Health Department
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 16, 2024
In November 2018, Menchu filed an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) complaint with the Oregon Employment Relations Board, asserting that the Department was discriminating against him by continuing to classify him as an on-call … Felder v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAndritz Inc. v. Cortex North America Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 30, 2021
Inc. v. Actavis LLC, 922 F.3d 1365, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (simplified). terms.’” Id. (quoting White v. Dunbar, 119 U.S. 47, 52 (1886)). … Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1314 (citing Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2001)). If that is the case, “general purpose dictionaries may be helpful.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJepsen v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 9, 2024
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). Instead, “the ALJ must specifically identify the testimony she or he finds not to be credible and must explain what evidence undermines the testimony.” … Nguyen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSerafin v. William C. Earhart Company Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 2020
“A board of six trustees appointed by [Local 737] and employers oversees the operations of the trust.” Id. at 5. Earhart handles “the day-to-day administration of the trust[.]” … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna