Case law

Thomas v. Board of Accountancy

74 Or. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 17, 1985

In Springfield Education Assn. v. … Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., supra, 290 Or at 223 .

Lofft v. State Board of Higher Education

89 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1988

Maher v. Gagne, 448 US 122, 133 , 100 S Ct 2570 , 65 L Ed 2d 653 (1980). In Rogers v. … Maher v.

Johnson v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

272 Or. App. 710 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 2015

City of Tualatin v. City-County Ins. … Smith v. Pernoll, 291 Or 67, 69 , 628 P2d 729 (1981).

Hall v. Board of Parole

16 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1974

Sterling v. Board of Parole, 16 Or App 481 , 519 P2d 1047 (1974).

Nichols v. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy

49 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1980

State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. for Lane County v. Brown

19 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1974

The defendant, Arnold Ray Brown, a child, age 16, appeals from the order and finding entered by the Lane County Juvenile Court after an extended trial that the defendant had committed an assault by stabbing upon two other … Dept. v.

Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. Oregon State Land Board

258 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2013

Claim 1: Judicial Review of DSL’s 1999 Order Claim 1 was the subject of our decision in Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. State Land Board, 211 Or App 251 , 154 P3d 734 , rev den, 343 Or 690 (2007). … Citing Boise Cascade Corp. v.

Kato v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 175 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1992

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of our decision dismissing his petition for review of an order of the Board of Parole. 111 Or App 661 , 825 P2d 663 (1992). … See Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We conclude that petitioner’s claims of error do not merit discussion. Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.

Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

277 Or. App. 76 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2016

Our recent decision in Handy v. … Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Board of Parole, 95 Or App 501, 504-05 , 769 P2d 795 (1989).

King v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

283 Or. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017

The board’s order does not disclose whether the board would have reached the same determination regarding petitioner’s capacity for rehabilitation had it not relied on the erroneous factual findings. … Under those circumstances, we must remand to the board to reconsider its decision without relying on the erroneous factual findings. See Reguero v.

Carrillo v. SAIF Corp. (In re Carrillo)

291 Or. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2018

The board did not explicitly resolve that issue, because it concluded, relying on this court's opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. … Vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017).

Meier v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991).

Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill County

301 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 2019

Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219, 229 n 7, 264 P3d 1265 (2011). … Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or App 149, 153 n 3, 238 P3d 1016 (2010), aff’d, 351 Or 219, 264 P3d 1265 (2011).

Leanord v. Board of Directors

92 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1988

Assn v. Sch. Dist., 25 Or App 85 , 548 P2d 204 (1976); see also East Co. Bargaining Council v. Centennial Sch. Dist., 298 Or 146 , 689 P2d 958 (1984); Central Point Sch. Dist. v. … In AFSCME v.

Perkins v. Board of Parole

113 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 1992

See Miller v. Employment Division, 290 Or 285,289 , 620 P2d 1377 (1980). … See Oregon Bankers Assn. v. Bureau of Labor and Ind., 102 Or App 539, 544 , 796 P2d 366 (1990). Rule held valid.

Umtuch v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 481 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1991

Bird v. Maass, 104 Or App 271 , 800 P2d 792 (1990). We accept the concession. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. There are 2 appellate case numbers, because 2 notices of appeal were filed by different counsel.

Cole v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

220 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 2008

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, based on State ex rel Gonzalez v. … in length unless the board “denies parole.” 182 Or App at 117 .

Simpson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

237 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2010

Martin v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 147, 157 , 957 P2d 1210 (1998); see also City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, 292 Or 266, 271-72 , 639 P2d 90 (1981). … However, the board does not contradict that assertion, and we accept it as true for purposes of our analysis. 4 See, e.g., United States v. T.

Akers v. Board of Parole

126 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994

He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. … Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993). Affirmed.

Day v. Board of Parole

103 Or. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1990

I dissent for the reasons expressed in Willaby v. Board of Parole, 103 Or App 83, 797 P2d 1050 (1990).